US Sureme Court says Fuck you to Religion

You can be sure anti-vaxxers are using a religious exemption to escape doing the right thing. There are 3000 religions recognized, so it is easy to pull off. That is why it should be eliminated.
 
You can be sure anti-vaxxers are using a religious exemption to escape doing the right thing. There are 3000 religions recognized, so it is easy to pull off. That is why it should be eliminated.

Paradox V. Discard of the Constitution of the United States.
 
The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution.

specifically:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

this is a grossly wrong ruling of a very specific and enumerated right. the FIRST such enumerated right.
 
The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution.

But it is their job, duty and Constitutional mandate, to INTERPRET the Constitution.

Just because whiny, butthurt right-wing fundie nitwit crybabies like you don't always agree with their interpretations, does not mean they are acting improperly or out of their jurisdiction.

Don't like it?

Fuck you.
 
The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the Constitution.

It may as well be working as little has been done to expand SCOTUS idea malfeasance for decades with protect & serve lynching enforcement for an Islamidiotocracy national religion where a fabricated Islam misnomer label for 2 Washington, D.C. born American citizens who reason Arab flying carpets & Islam burning flying chariots are as much pseudoscience as the fabricated misnomer Jesus the Christ conception in that "serve the Pope or die" Christiananality pedophilia business with Nazi Germany contract for Jewish Holocaust deaths bartered for Islam oil brokered by the Catholic Church continuation in accomplishing 9/11 holycosts certainly has been their suicidal super ego master plan of sociopsychopathilogical homicidal human farming a schizophrenic patriot act for decades as if little more than abortions.
 
But it is their job, duty and Constitutional mandate, to INTERPRET the Constitution.

Just because whiny, butthurt right-wing fundie nitwit crybabies like you don't always agree with their interpretations, does not mean they are acting improperly or out of their jurisdiction.

Don't like it?

Fuck you.

1+1=3.

Will the SCOTUS trample on your free exercise rights by overturning Roe?
 
1+1=3.

Will the SCOTUS trample on your free exercise rights by overturning Roe?

I have no idea what they will do.

But whether I agree with it or not, they still have the duty and the right to make the decision.

Even if I and others think it is the wrong decision.

Try to focus on the subject at hand.
 
1+1=3.

Will the SCOTUS trample on your free exercise rights by overturning Roe?

It was mostly settled by privacy rights. The left does not want the government way deep into people's lives. The right says they do not want a police state, but they are sure pushing one.
 
Liberals hate the constitution because it limits the power of their god, the government, over we the people.

As these Christian Nation survival of the fittest fascists Peter Principle pyramid scheme national religion Christiananlity pedophilia "man is God" economics master plan of thieving US Constitution arsonists granted standing to a master race of themselves for a fabricated misnomer immaculate Jesus the Christ conception to further grant standing with lynching enforcement to protect & serve Arab flying carpets & Islam flying flaming chariots to Vahalla for 9/11 as "one nation under God with equal justice under law" federal perjury.
 
I have no idea what they will do.

But whether I agree with it or not, they still have the duty and the right to make the decision.

Even if I and others think it is the wrong decision.

Try to focus on the subject at hand.
Progressives need abortion so that they can make sacrifices to Gaia.
 
specifically:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

this is a grossly wrong ruling of a very specific and enumerated right. the FIRST such enumerated right.

Also, The Supreme Court shall MAKE NO LAW. That is usurping the authority of Congress.
 
But it is their job, duty and Constitutional mandate, to INTERPRET the Constitution.
Changing the Constitution is not interpreting it! Redefinition fallacy. The Supreme Court has no authority to interpret the Constitution either. It is NOT their job. See Article III of the Constitution to see what their job actually is.
Just because whiny, butthurt right-wing fundie nitwit crybabies like you don't always agree with their interpretations, does not mean they are acting improperly or out of their jurisdiction.
They are acting beyond their authority.
Don't like it?

Fuck you.

Discard of the Constitution of the United States.
 
I have no idea what they will do.

But whether I agree with it or not, they still have the duty and the right to make the decision.
They do not have either the duty nor the right to make that decision. See Articles I and III and the 9th and 10th amendments.
Even if I and others think it is the wrong decision.

Try to focus on the subject at hand.
The subject at hand is a violation of the Constitution of the United States (which you discard).
 
Back
Top