Face it moron, you saw some site you never
heard of and just assumed it was a Conservative site bias to help me, what your dumbass forgot is that my point is not something that really makes Republicans look all that great.
I NEVER insinuated anything about my thoughts as to the political leaning of the site.... I made no such assumption. period.
Another lie, I never said that, what I did say was that APPROVAL RATINGS follow the price of gas for BUSH, which they clearly do:
http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/gasindex_files/NEWBUSHINDEX_28670_image001.gif
Try again lying piece of shit.
and again...to suggest that approval rating of the president is based solely upon gas prices is as ridiculous now as when you said it the first time. That was ALWAYS my ONLY point
You are completely destroyed and a proven liar, whereas I just made a bad assumption that I admitted had a chance of being wrong when I said a thousand to one.
I do not lie. You've proven shit. You call me a whore.... I call you a fucking moron. See how that works?
I didn't bet a penny, it was a saying, but if you really want me to place an amount then fine, I bet oh how about -100$
You win, so pay me $100,000 (negative 100 times 1000 = -100,000 for you to pay to me).
Pay up you welching motherfucker!
is that the best you can come up with? grade school playground shit? "Im rubber , you're glue"?
My point remains: attempting to say that presidential approval ratings are a one variable function is assinine.
Saying that I had never heard of Jim Webb before is even more stupid. Jesus...you KNOW I served a career in the Navy. It sounds to me like YOU'D never heard of Jim Webb and that YOU had no idea he was a naval academy graduate, a critically acclaimed author, and Reagan's SECNAV. Who's looking foolish here? that would be dano de girliemano