The Harris Administration
Official
You don't understand my point. Questioning her teenage fast food job from 40 years ago has zero to do with what she's doing today. Harris could claim that trump never worked on his father's construction sites as a teen and who could prove her wrong? None of this teenage stuff is relevant.
Others disagree, don't they?
There's a perception that candidates need to be factual, and everything they claim to have done is subject to question.
If a candidate claims they did something like work in a McDonald's, it's to gain "street cred" and is done to build relatability.
They'd better have receipts. If they don't, people notice.
If a person is prone to making unsubstantiated claims, it's relevant.
If a person is careless logically, it's relevant.
Wouldn't you agree?
Cuts both ways.