A white jury in a white black hating town freed a self confessed murderer and you and you idiotic friends are cheering it like the racist pigs you all are.
For those short on brains, one who murders is a murderer whether convicted or not.
A murderer who is convicted is known as a convicted murderer.
I understand English is difficult for you. I am here to help.
Originally Posted by Rune
Here are the facts, fuckhead;
Travon is dead. True
Zim shot him to death. True
You are a moron. No proof, other then your vivid imagination
All indisputable. Not according to the Court
A white jury in a white black hating town freed a self confessed murderer and you and you idiotic friends are cheering it like the racist pigs you all are.
Sorry, but the court didn't rule on your idiocy.
Nice lie, try again.
Originally Posted by Rune
Here are the facts, fuckhead;
Travon is dead. True
Zim shot him to death. True
You are a moron. No proof, other then your vivid imagination
All indisputable. Not according to the Court
A white jury in a white black hating town freed a self confessed murderer and you and you idiotic friends are cheering it like the racist pigs you all are.
Sorry, but the court didn't rule on your idiocy.
Nice lie, try again.
It is time for the people to take justice into their own hands!
Think it through Wacko. Murder is a legal term. So is not guilty. No one is ever found innocent of a crime in US jurisprudence. You can damned well be a murderer but if the legal standard of reasonable doubt is not met than you are aquited or found not guilty.Not following on this one. The OJ trial was whether he killed two people or not. Zimmerman admitted he shot and killed Trayvon. That wasn't a question. Obviously it was whether it was a matter of self defense or not.
so you're suggesting a lynch mob and these folks are thanking you?.....
Kel-Tec PMR-30 (Yesterday), Professor Baxter (Yesterday), Rune (Today), Threedee (Today)
OJ is not a murderer?
Nope. It means Zimmerman is not a convicted murderer. He will always be a murderer.
I honestly have a suspicion the psychopath will find his way into a cell soon.
You lack the moral qualifications to question anyone else's morals, hypocrite.
this is what happens when a place refuses to face their real history.
I asked many of the liberals what they would do when they found GZ not guilty... and almost none of them would ever answer.
It's good that a Hispanic man can get a fair trial in the US today.
You were doing good until you said "an innocent kid was killed".
He was an attacker, he was no kid at seventeen, he was a young man.
There is no celebration from the adults, only from the trolls .......
It was a tragedy all around and will remain a tragedy....if Z wasn't armed and talking to the cops at the time, he could very well be one in the morgue...with no suspects to accuse.
people on the left will never understand this......because the jury decided on the basis of reasonable doubt and no one on the left is reasonable.......
It's the right wingers that don't seem to understand he can be an unconvicted murderer.
you want to lynch a guy and you're bringing up morals?......
I hope no one retaliates against Zimmerman; while I think the verdict was fucked, it was a verdict and we have to live with it.
But he probably won't be a cop now, and that's a good thing.
I wonder if Martins will do a civil lawsuit now? Like with OJ....
Care to show the legal definition of that, or is it the liberal's new catch phrase?
It's the right wingers that don't seem to understand he can be an unconvicted murderer.