Video evidence of election fraud

If this was a criminal trial, and Biden was accused of election fraud, the defense attorney would have the easiest paycheck of his life.

'Is defense counsel ready'?

'Yes your honor, the defense rests'

Not guilty. Boom. Done. See, you have to prove your case in a court of law with evidence and stuff.
 
The Supreme Court will be the final arbiter, not some bottom feeding, sewer rats.

Of course the cheating Democrats oppose fair elections. They would never win a fair election.
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
only courts and possibly government oversight officials can judge voting fraud concerns and evidence, not the press. but what is stopping fox and rush and breitbart and gateway pundit from FINDING ACTUAL CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF ANY VOTER FRAUD AT ANY SCALE TO EVEN AFFECT A LOCAL DOG CATCHER RACE?
Click to expand...

The notion that no significant evidence is being presented is a notion that was engineered by the media. You did not come up with this idea yourself, the msm who owns your perspective of the political landscape came up with it. Evidence is being presented every day, lots of it. There are dozens of threads about on this very forum. Lefties have to dismiss any and all evidence, allegations, or discussion of election fraud like a hot potato though, since they only have one card to play. That card is the notion that Beijing Biden "won" a free and fair election. Lefties have to back the steal, since they have no other card to play. It's a gamble for lefties, but it's not like lefties can ever win a free and fair election. Might as well back the steal, right?
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
do you even realize how stupid you are? you are saying, basically, that biden and democrats and state voting officials have to present reliable, incontrovertible evidence SOMETHING DID NOT HAPPEN....not trump and rudy and the other morons who claim there is voter fraud HAVING TO PROVE THERE IS....YOU CANNOT PROVE SOMETHING NEVER HAPPENED, ONLY THAT SOMETHING DID HAPPEN.
Click to expand...

Lefties have to dismiss any and all evidence, allegations, or discussion of election fraud like a hot potato, since they only have one card to play. That card is the notion that Beijing Biden "won" a free and fair election. Lefties have to back the steal, since they have no other card to play. It's a gamble for lefties, but it's not like lefties can ever win a free and fair election. Might as well back the steal, right?
 
Evmetro said:
The notion that no significant evidence is being presented is a notion that was engineered by the media. You did not come up with this idea yourself, the msm who owns your perspective of the political landscape came up with it. Evidence is being presented every day, lots of it. There are dozens of threads about on this very forum. Lefties have to dismiss any and all evidence, allegations, or discussion of election fraud like a hot potato though, since they only have one card to play. That card is the notion that Beijing Biden "won" a free and fair election. Lefties have to back the steal, since they have no other card to play. It's a gamble for lefties, but it's not like lefties can ever win a free and fair election. Might as well back the steal, right?
Click to expand...

read the papers. none of it is PROOF...it is hearsay, bullshit, even repub judges laugh at it, repub voting officials laugh at it. you are embarrassing yourself.
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
only courts and possibly government oversight officials can judge voting fraud concerns and evidence, not the press. but what is stopping fox and rush and breitbart and gateway pundit from FINDING ACTUAL CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF ANY VOTER FRAUD AT ANY SCALE TO EVEN AFFECT A LOCAL DOG CATCHER RACE?
Click to expand...

My guess would be because there is none. Our cult friends seem to be struggling with the idea that #LOSER45's very own administration has stated that there is no evidence of any widespread error or fraud, and that "this was the most secure election in history." Despite his denials of Russian meddling in the 2016 election, you can bet your bippy that our voting system were hardened against any sort of cyber attacks since then.

They also don't seem to be able to explain just how it is that if votes were changed from Trump to Biden, why the perps didn't do the same with the down-ticket races.

It's just more snowflaky whining from the Reichwing. Most of all it's the Grifter-in-Chief trying to get donations to "stop the steal" so he can pay off his massive debts and buy more lawyers to stay out of prison.
 
Evmetro said:
Lefties have to dismiss any and all evidence, allegations, or discussion of election fraud like a hot potato, since they only have one card to play. That card is the notion that Beijing Biden "won" a free and fair election. Lefties have to back the steal, since they have no other card to play. It's a gamble for lefties, but it's not like lefties can ever win a free and fair election. Might as well back the steal, right?
Click to expand...

"Lefties" win the popular vote every time now. They're a special election in January away from controlling both houses of Congress and the executive branch.

They're doing fine.

Quick question: for a coordinated fraud effort like Trump is alleging....how many people do you think would need to be involved? Just ballpark....
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
read the papers. none of it is PROOF...it is hearsay, bullshit, even repub judges laugh at it, repub voting officials laugh at it. you are embarrassing yourself.
Click to expand...

Lefties have to dismiss any and all evidence, allegations, or discussion of election fraud like a hot potato, since they only have one card to play. That card is the notion that Beijing Biden "won" a free and fair election. Lefties have to back the steal, since they have no other card to play. It's a gamble for lefties, but it's not like lefties can ever win a free and fair election. Might as well back the steal, right?
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
My guess would be because there is none. Our cult friends seem to be struggling with the idea that #LOSER45's very own administration has stated that there is no evidence of any widespread error or fraud, and that "this was the most secure election in history." Despite his denials of Russian meddling in the 2016 election, you can bet your bippy that our voting system were hardened against any sort of cyber attacks since then.

They also don't seem to be able to explain just how it is that if votes were changed from Trump to Biden, why the perps didn't do the same with the down-ticket races.

It's just more snowflaky whining from the Reichwing. Most of all it's the Grifter-in-Chief trying to get donations to "stop the steal" so he can pay off his massive debts and buy more lawyers to stay out of prison.
Click to expand...

Lefties have to dismiss any and all evidence, allegations, or discussion of election fraud like a hot potato, since they only have one card to play. That card is the notion that Beijing Biden "won" a free and fair election. Lefties have to back the steal, since they have no other card to play. It's a gamble for lefties, but it's not like lefties can ever win a free and fair election. Might as well back the steal, right?
 
Evmetro said:
The notion that no significant evidence is being presented is a notion that was engineered by the media. You did not come up with this idea yourself, the msm who owns your perspective of the political landscape came up with it. Evidence is being presented every day, lots of it. There are dozens of threads about on this very forum. Lefties have to dismiss any and all evidence, allegations, or discussion of election fraud like a hot potato though, since they only have one card to play. That card is the notion that Beijing Biden "won" a free and fair election. Lefties have to back the steal, since they have no other card to play. It's a gamble for lefties, but it's not like lefties can ever win a free and fair election. Might as well back the steal, right?
Click to expand...

No. It is a fact. The proof that there is no evidence can be found in the courts. They have dismissed every single claim of voter fraud out of hand. Because there is no evidence. It doesn't matter what the media says, it matters what a judge says. You have NOTHING.
 
Evmetro said:
Lefties have to dismiss any and all evidence, allegations, or discussion of election fraud like a hot potato, since they only have one card to play. That card is the notion that Beijing Biden "won" a free and fair election. Lefties have to back the steal, since they have no other card to play. It's a gamble for lefties, but it's not like lefties can ever win a free and fair election. Might as well back the steal, right?
Click to expand...

Nah. We just dismiss bullshit, nonsense, claptrap, crazy talk, rubbish, hogwash, and your unceasing but delicious tears. :laugh:
 
Concart said:
No. It is a fact. The proof that there is no evidence can be found in the courts. They have dismissed every single claim of voter fraud out of hand. Because there is no evidence. It doesn't matter what the media says, it matters what a judge says. You have NOTHING.
Click to expand...

Wrong, Concarty.

There is a case now at the US Supreme Court from Pa. stating that the mail in ballots were unconstitutional.

There are more from other states that are being adjudicated.

There is video evidence and sworn testimony, under penalty of perjury, from hundreds of witnesses.
 
Concart said:
No. It is a fact. The proof that there is no evidence can be found in the courts. They have dismissed every single claim of voter fraud out of hand. Because there is no evidence. It doesn't matter what the media says, it matters what a judge says. You have NOTHING.
Click to expand...

The notion that no significant evidence is being presented is a notion that was engineered by the media. You did not come up with this idea yourself, the msm who owns your perspective of the political landscape came up with it. Evidence is being presented every day, lots of it. There are dozens of threads about on this very forum. Lefties have to dismiss any and all evidence, allegations, or discussion of election fraud like a hot potato though, since they only have one card to play. That card is the notion that Beijing Biden "won" a free and fair election. Lefties have to back the steal, since they have no other card to play. It's a gamble for lefties, but it's not like lefties can ever win a free and fair election. Might as well back the steal, right?
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Nah. We just dismiss bullshit, nonsense, claptrap, crazy talk, rubbish, hogwash, and your unceasing but delicious tears. :laugh:
Click to expand...

Lefties have to dismiss any and all evidence, allegations, or discussion of election fraud like a hot potato, since they only have one card to play. That card is the notion that Beijing Biden "won" a free and fair election. Lefties have to back the steal, since they have no other card to play. It's a gamble for lefties, but it's not like lefties can ever win a free and fair election. Might as well back the steal, right?
 
Earl said:
Wrong, Concarty.

There is a case now at the US Supreme Court from Pa. stating that the mail in ballots were unconstitutional.

There are more from other states that are being adjudicated.

There is video evidence and sworn testimony, under penalty of perjury, from hundreds of witnesses.
Click to expand...

No there isn't such a case, Earl. You are making it up. If you are talking about the emergency request to delay certification, that was sent ONLY to Alito, who will deny it.
 
Earl said:
Wrong, Concarty.

There is a case now at the US Supreme Court from Pa. stating that the mail in ballots were unconstitutional.

There are more from other states that are being adjudicated.

There is video evidence and sworn testimony, under penalty of perjury, from hundreds of witnesses.
Click to expand...

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud
 
Concart said:
No there isn't such a case, Earl. You are making it up. If you are talking about the emergency request to delay certification, that was sent ONLY to Alito, who will deny it.
Click to expand...

Yes, there is.

It’s at the Supreme Court.

washingtonpost.com › courts_law › 2020/12/01
3 days ago — The Pennsylvania Supreme Court had said the “extraordinary” request ... Trump allies to ask Supreme Court to block Pennsylvania ruling on mail-in ballots ... have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block a decision by Pennsylvania's ... with due diligence in commencing their facial constitutional challenge, ...
 
Earl said:
Wrong, Concarty.

There is a case now at the US Supreme Court from Pa. stating that the mail in ballots were unconstitutional.

There are more from other states that are being adjudicated.

There is video evidence and sworn testimony, under penalty of perjury, from hundreds of witnesses.
Click to expand...

none of it has passed even a little bit of scrutiny. you have to have actual evidence. not a bunch of yahoos SAYING they saw something. good god. even repub secretaries of state and official election officers of the state have said these charges are bullshit, even AG Barr has said he has seen no evidence of any real voter fraud....what are you freaking even talking about?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top