Video of 'Drive Thru' testing.

TOP said:
Welcome who now? Send them back where?
You're missing the part where I said it's easy to take a temp...that's what we were discussing I thought...
Tell me exactly what you want the US to do...
Click to expand...

:) 2 months ago we should have been gearing up for an epidemic. The Coronavirus came here from Overseas, it didn't start here. Anyone with a high temperature should have been denied Entry.
Does that make sense?
 
Jack said:
:) 2 months ago we should have been gearing up for an epidemic. The Coronavirus came here from Overseas, it didn't start here. Anyone with a high temperature should have been denied Entry.
Does that make sense?
Click to expand...
We should have been denying those with high temps entry into this country for decades...right?
 
Hello Jack,

Wow, pretty impressive:

Jack said:
Click to expand...

Makes sense:

"South Koreans have the right to universal healthcare, ranking first in the OECD for healthcare access.[1] Satisfaction of healthcare has been consistently among the highest in the world – South Korea was rated as the fourth most efficient healthcare system by Bloomberg.[2][3]

The quality of South Korean healthcare has been ranked as being among the world's best. It had the OECD's highest colorectal cancer survival rate at 72.8%, significantly ahead of Denmark's 55.5% or the UK's 54.5%. It ranked second in cervical cancer survival rate at 76.8%, significantly ahead of Germany's 64.5% or the U.S. at 62.2%.[4] Hemorrhagic stroke 30 day in-hospital mortality per 100 hospital discharges was the OECD's third lowest at 13.7 deaths, which was almost twice as low as the U.S. at 22.3 or France's 24 deaths. For Ischemic stroke, it ranked second at 3.4 deaths, which was almost a third of Australia's 9.4 or Canada's 9.7 deaths. South Korean hospitals ranked 4th for MRI units per capita and 6th for CT scanners per capita in the OECD. It also had the OECD's second largest number of hospital beds per 1000 people at 9.56 beds, which was over triple that of Sweden's 2.71, Canada's 2.75, the UK's 2.95, or the U.S. at 3.05 beds.[5] "

Healthcare in South Korea
 
And to think that South Korea probably has that amazingly efficient universal healthcare system for half the cost per person - of the selective, elite, partial-coverage of the for-profit system in the USA.

SMH.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Jack,

Wow, pretty impressive:



Makes sense:

"South Koreans have the right to universal healthcare, ranking first in the OECD for healthcare access.[1] Satisfaction of healthcare has been consistently among the highest in the world – South Korea was rated as the fourth most efficient healthcare system by Bloomberg.[2][3]

The quality of South Korean healthcare has been ranked as being among the world's best. It had the OECD's highest colorectal cancer survival rate at 72.8%, significantly ahead of Denmark's 55.5% or the UK's 54.5%. It ranked second in cervical cancer survival rate at 76.8%, significantly ahead of Germany's 64.5% or the U.S. at 62.2%.[4] Hemorrhagic stroke 30 day in-hospital mortality per 100 hospital discharges was the OECD's third lowest at 13.7 deaths, which was almost twice as low as the U.S. at 22.3 or France's 24 deaths. For Ischemic stroke, it ranked second at 3.4 deaths, which was almost a third of Australia's 9.4 or Canada's 9.7 deaths. South Korean hospitals ranked 4th for MRI units per capita and 6th for CT scanners per capita in the OECD. It also had the OECD's second largest number of hospital beds per 1000 people at 9.56 beds, which was over triple that of Sweden's 2.71, Canada's 2.75, the UK's 2.95, or the U.S. at 3.05 beds.[5] "

Healthcare in South Korea
Click to expand...

Thanks
 
Trumpcucks be like

tenor.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top