Virginia R niw has black face
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
christiefan915
Catalyst
You and others are calling Ford a liar with no substantiation. You can't be honest and admit it was "she said-he said." I believe her, you believe him. I wish you cons would stop calling it a smear job against O'Kavanaugh.
christiefan915
Catalyst
It was a sham. Ford could have provided DNA and they'd still call her a liar.
That is all it turned into. That is very hard to argue against.
christiefan915
Catalyst
It was a smear job against Ford also.
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
Well, it would be hard for her to provide evidence of something that she was lying about.
christiefan915
Catalyst
And you have zero proof of that. The RW smear machine went into overdrive because cons were so determined to put O'Kavanaugh on the court. Ford was composed, her testimony was believable and she got nothing out of it except death threats and trash talk. O'Kavanaugh was a crying, sniffling, sweating mess who couldn't believe this woman put his raunchy past on public display.
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
Which was the whole point of the tactic. Frankly, though, there was enough testimony to conclude that she was at least "mistaken," if not lying.
Superfreak
Verified User
I said she had no substantiation to her claims. Yet morons insisted we 'believe her'. I stated at the time that I believe she was attacked at some point in her life. I don't think a single thing she has stated or anyone else has stated shows it was Kavanaugh. The liars I mentioned were the other two.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Maybe you forgot that Ford took a polygraph and passed. I don't recall the results of O'Kavanaugh's test, do you?
christiefan915
Catalyst
She passed a polygraph. Remind me, what was the result of O'Kavanaugh's polygraph? And before you launch into any BS that she took pre-test coaching, Bart could have had coaching also.
"The former FBI agent then ran the results of Ford's two "no" responses through three separate scoring algorithms, including one developed by Johns Hopkins University. All three algorithms concluded that Ford's responses did not indicate apparent deception, with one putting the probability that she was lying at .002 and another putting it at less than .02. "
Superfreak
Verified User
LMAO... a polygraph that she knew how to beat, run by her lawyers? ok... also, funny how the ONLY thing she could remember for sure was that it was Kavanaugh. Even though NO ONE else knew what the hell she was talking about, she could not recall where or when the event occured, what age she was, who was there, how she got there, how she got home etc...
What exactly do you think his polygraph would have done? Ask him 'do you recall an event where you almost might have thought about raping someone, but we can't tell you when or where it happened?'
LMAO
christiefan915
Catalyst
LMAO at you for thinking Bart didn't remember what Ford was talking about, especially with his calendar right in front of him. The polygrapher could have asked him "were you ever in a situation where a girl or girls was sexually assaulted", followed by "have you ever grabbed a girl or girls in a sexually aggressive manner without their permission"?
Bart could have had the same pre-test coaching Ford did and that everyone does who takes that test. Passing the test could have given him the confidence to testify at the hearing without becoming a sweaty, nervous, blubbering mess. At the very least his demeanor showed how easy it was for him to crack under pressure.
Superfreak
Verified User
Moron. Just because he attended a party, doesn't mean any such event occurred. Ford couldn't recall how old she was, when and where the party was, how she got there, how she got home, the layout of the home where it allegedly happened... nothing. What she did 'remember' were people who were there... but NONE of them recalled it. What she did 'remember' was it had to be Kavanaugh.
It is truly fucking hilarious that you think his calendar is any sort of evidence to support her. He could have had 100 parties on there over the years and she couldn't tell you anything about any of them.
But your hatred consumed you and you blamed him anyway. You probably even 'believed' the other two, who had even LESS evidence or support than Ford.
as for him 'cracking under pressure'... being falsely accused of a heinous act is going to upset good people. I know you support misogynistic assholes and pretend they are great guys, so I get that actual good people confuse you.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Here's a newsflash moron: sexual assault almost always happens in secret. Nuts like you must think it's only real if it had witnesses. Ford didn't tell the people at the house what happened, she just left, but the guys with Bart knew. Mark Judge's book gave a very detailed account of the obnoxious, entitled drunks who were his friends, including Bart.
It's fucking hilarious that you completely disregarded the 40-odd people who contacted the FBI about BOTH people, and whom the FBI never called back. There was no legitimate reason to rush through Bart's confirmation; previously the court had been missing a justice for over a year... Obama nominated Garland in March 2016; Gorsuch was confirmed in April 2017. As I said before, why the rush to get him confirmed? The truth is that repubs were so desperate to pack the court that they were willing to overlook anything that might keep that from happening.
Hatred of Ford consumed cons right from the beginning. You blamed her just like I blamed Kavanaugh. I know it's tough for you to understand that Bart's testimony, demeanor and excuses damned him in many eyes, not just mine. You claim that he was "falsely accused" yet you have no proof it was false. People who are sure of their innocence don't have to sob and carry on; they just have to stay calm and steadfast under pressure.
ROFL at you saying I support misogynistic assholes. Your side is composed of misogynistic assholes starting with trump. If you ever criticized him and other cons for their lewd, crude actions I missed it. If you ever criticized the misogynistic, vulgar, c**t-calling RWNJs on this forum, I missed that, too. So refresh my memory.