voo doo economics

montgomery said:
I didn't say anything about job cuts of middle class workers. Do you not understand that lowering taxes of corporations won't help the poor and middle class? If you don't understand that then you must subscribe to SS economics.
Click to expand...

Oh, I get it. Sorry, I was having a hard time understanding your post. You and I are in complete agreement here.
 
LV426 said:
Oh, I get it. Sorry, I was having a hard time understanding your post. You and I are in complete agreement here.
Click to expand...

That would be nice if we are but how about my position of neither major party being able to fix the mess your country is in? And the fact that Trump fooled the people into thinking that he was one of them and was going to work to change things for the betterment of the people.

Basically, I'm of the opinion that both big parties represent the American way and that's at the root of fooling the people for far too long. It's a detailed discussion and I'll start a new thread on that topic. It'll be spammed into oblivion but we can all learn to read between the lines. We all should know the asshole culprits by now.
 
montgomery said:
That would be nice if we are but how about my position of neither major party being able to fix the mess your country is in?
Click to expand...

That's where we disagree and where your "both sides" does more damage to progress and resolution.

"Both sides" are not the same. Not even close.

"Both sides" is propaganda that normalizes hideous Conservatism.

It also tells the world that you cannot be expected to make distinctions, so we must manage our expectations of you downward, thereby diminishing your reliability.

It's also incredibly lazy, and I see it as posturing more than anything else.
 
montgomery said:
That would be nice if we are but how about my position of neither major party being able to fix the mess your country is in? And the fact that Trump fooled the people into thinking that he was one of them and was going to work to change things for the betterment of the people.

Basically, I'm of the opinion that both big parties represent the American way and that's at the root of fooling the people for far too long. It's a detailed discussion and I'll start a new thread on that topic. It'll be spammed into oblivion but we can all learn to read between the lines. We all should know the asshole culprits by now.
Click to expand...

Can you sit there and honesty say that if Clinton were President, we'd find ourselves in the same situation we're in right now?
 
LV426 said:
Can you sit there and honesty say that if Clinton were President, we'd find ourselves in the same situation we're in right now?
Click to expand...

I can honestly say that you were in the situation you're in right now before Trump.

That's precisely what I said when I mentioned Trump's promises to the poor and middle class. And then they bought into his lies. And it's also true that Bernie was promising practically the same solutions as Trump promised, but Bernie would have tried to make it happen. And he would have failed too of course because the American way is established in people's heads and won't be beaten out with a stick overnight. But like I said it's a different conversation and I've started the thread for the discussion already.
 
montgomery said:
I can honestly say that you were in the situation you're in right now before Trump. That's precisely what I said when I mentioned Trump's promises to the poor and middle class. And then they bought into his lies. And it's also true that Bernie was promising practically the same solutions as Trump promised, but Bernie would have tried to make it happen. And he would have failed too of course because the American way is established in people's heads and won't be beaten out with a stick overnight. But like I said it's a different conversation and I've started the thread for the discussion already.
Click to expand...

Bruh, this is "both siderism" at its worst.
 
LV426 said:
LOL! Because you bought into propaganda, as usual:

Morgan Stanley Predicts Ford to Cut 25,000 Jobs in Overhaul
December 3rd, 2018
Ford Motor Co.’s $11 billion restructuring could cost 25,000 employees their jobs, exceeding the cutbacks General Motors Co. announced last week, according to Morgan Stanley.
Ford’s 70,000 salaried employees have been told they face unspecified job losses by the middle of next year as the automaker works through an “organizational redesign” aimed at creating a white-collar workforce “designed for speed,” according to Karen Hampton, a spokeswoman.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...icts-ford-to-cut-25-000-jobs-in-restructuring

Kill yourself.
Click to expand...

Predicts?

I'm having too much fun mocking a n-lover like you.
 
LV426 said:
Says the guy on SSDI.




So here's the cognitive dissonance: You screech about welfare spending, but then oppose raising wages which would reduce welfare spending.

You're just a backwards, inbred moron.
Click to expand...

Says the guy that has yet to prove a damn thing he's claimed about me or himself.

No one is opposed to wages being raised as long as those increases are earned. You propose waging someone's wages despite anything being done to earn it.


The claim about inbred is funny coming from a piece of trash whose baby daddy is the typical runaway sperm donor his mother can't say which one he is. That's what happens when the whore fucks so many around the same time she can't keep up.
 
LV426 said:
How so? By going to college? By getting training?

How are they supposed to do that if they can't afford it? You want them to borrow? How do you improve your skills without spending money training or getting educated?
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter as long as they improve them to EARN the increase they want.

If they can't afford it, it's another opportunity for YOU to prove you care as much as you say you care.
 
LV426 said:
Wait...so in 1959 it was 23%...in the 60's, the Great Society was passed and then by 1981, it was down to 15%.

So thanks for making my point for me.
Click to expand...

It was down to 15% before any of the Great Society programs ever started. Your chart, if you could read it, shows that.

It's still at 15% today despite $22 trillion being spent since 1965. Thanks for proving that money was wasted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top