voter supression
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
Well, then prove it.....and checking to see if voters actually lived at the given address on their registration is not cheating,...its what should be done
as a matter of course by the federal government to ensure the integration of an election....so give that crap a rest already.
now I'll wait for this proof of 'cheating for decades' bullshit.
I was worried the UFO had come back for her.
The most infamous historical election cheaters were LBJ (Texas) and Daley (Chicago) Democrats
and you're right about the demographics of the country....illegals overrunning the country, etc.....thats why the dems fight about voter ID regulations,
if voters had to prove their right to vote, dems would be in the shitter.......
First, you should look up those hard words you don't understand...
I said INfamous, not famous....as in... having an extremely bad reputation. deserving of or causing an evil reputation; shamefully bad; detestable
The MEDIA was, once upon a time, fair and balanced.
Now, it is notorious for protecting the left, the liberals, the Democrats ....not the other way around.
AND...checking to see if voters actually lived at the given address on their registration is not cheating,...its what should be done
as a matter of course by the federal government to ensure the integration of an election....so give that crap a rest already.
STILL waiting for this proof of 'cheating for decades' bullshit.
evince
Truthmatters
Maybe you'd better look up the spelling of the word.
sup·pres·sion
səˈpreSHən/
noun
noun: suppression
1.
the action of suppressing something such as an activity or publication.
evince
Truthmatters
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice...consent-decree
At Supreme Court, no reprieve for GOP in voting rights consent decree
US Supreme Court on Monday turned aside a petition from the Republican National Committee to lift a 30-year-old consent decree. The decree requires the RNC to refrain from tactics that could suppress voting rights.
By Warren Richey, Staff writer / January 14, 2013
why do you never face these cold hard court documented facts?
At Supreme Court, no reprieve for GOP in voting rights consent decree
US Supreme Court on Monday turned aside a petition from the Republican National Committee to lift a 30-year-old consent decree. The decree requires the RNC to refrain from tactics that could suppress voting rights.
By Warren Richey, Staff writer / January 14, 2013
why do you never face these cold hard court documented facts?
Thats all ya got.....a 30 year old consent decree...a 30-year-old consent decree that restricts the political party’s ability to enforce preelection ballot security programs.
Yeah...the last thing we want is to enforce election ballot security....
The gov. won't do its job and now political parties are not allowed to do it either....
Maybe you pinheads are afraid to find out the facts about how election fraud would expose your side....