It is not the internal software that would be breaking the machines. That would be a maintenance issue and it would be under the control of the county clerk.
The reality is it is not a conspiracy to keep Obama from winning in PA. If it were it would have to be from the D County Clerk breaking the machines.
Who oversees the voting machine companies to inspect and inforce standards for the voting machines?
The Secretary of State does. They also set standards of certification and testing.Who oversees the voting machine companies to inspect and inforce standards for the voting machines?
What standards?
Again, Desh.
Why would they buy machines for their counties that suck? Why would those people elect County Clerks that would do that to them?
If our County Clerk did this she would lose her job, very quickly. She might even be recalled.
I agree. We do that........then we run it through a machine that counts the votes. Now we have the vote counted but we also have a paper ballot to go back to if need be. How hard is that?
If I were County Clerk I'd be going for the optical scan machines because they give the benefits of scanned paper ballots and easy handcounts if necessary.I think lots of voting machines are still mechanical and not computerized. I don't know what kind Penn uses but the Mechanical ones can be maintainence nightmares. I know because in my county we used those machines until our State Supreme Court told us we had to follow the rest of the state and use paper ballots.
In this case, we were told that the Sec of State controlled the purses and provided the cash.African American communities have less money because the property in the area is usually worth less (because most blacks are poorer and no whites want to live in black areas). Therefore, they have less money to pay for upkeep of voting machines. I would suggest something radical, like maybe, the state should help out, but then I'd hate America, so I won't.
That is what was used when I was in Kansas. Just scans the document, reports what bubble was filled in and that was all. No need for intricate software codes or gears and levers. I don't understand why they are not the universal machines.If I were County Clerk I'd be going for the optical scan machines because they give the benefits of scanned paper ballots and easy handcounts if necessary.
Look, I am wiht Damo here. You guys see way to much conspiracy here in a state where both the Governor and the Sec of the Commonwealth are dems. Granted they might be Hillary supporters but they have had 2 years to correct the problems they had. They haven't. Why not? You can't tell me that 2 years ago they knew it was going to be close like this and so they kept the machines to make sure the freshman senator from Ill would lose to the inevitable Hillary. Just too much for me swallow all at once.
Me either. The fact that they aren't does lend credence to conspiracies. Especially when testing certain machines you find that they can easily be hacked and have no trail whatsoever.That is what was used when I was in Kansas. Just scans the document, reports what bubble was filled in and that was all. No need for intricate software codes or gears and levers. I don't understand why they are not the universal machines.
In this case, we were told that the Sec of State controlled the purses and provided the cash.
But even so, it would not be conspiracy then. Would it? If they spend less on maintenance and things break it isn't a conspiracy, it is not "justice" either, but it isn't because somebody wanted those counties to break.
That is what was used when I was in Kansas. Just scans the document, reports what bubble was filled in and that was all. No need for intricate software codes or gears and levers. I don't understand why they are not the universal machines.
True. And it is possible that this is what is happening and IMO far more likely than Hillary being able to magically break things from a distance.I wasn't saying it was a conspiracy. I was trying to come up with something alternate to a conspiracy.
EXACTLY BAC!
NO ONE does.
They aslo have fought tooth and nail to keep the source codes Private and allow NO ONE to review them