Wake up, neocons!

come on, touch.....if you want somebody to debate you, you have to put some effort into it.....say something smart enough to pay attention to, I don't know, maybe you could at least find something smart to cut and paste....something!.....but the crap you've been posting so far.....it just isn't inspiring....you gotta work with me here....

You're not fooling anyone......you keep making accusations, but you provide NO PROOF to back up your babbling. Bottom line: I hit a nerve, and being a the postmodernfool that you are, you'd rather just BS rather than try to logically and factually disprove what I write.

you don't like what I write, either disprove it or ignore it. Your whining and sour grapes are not a discussion point. So until you've got the cojones to actually debate the issue, I'll just dismiss your next set of drivel. Carry on.
 
touchyliberal just likes to drop meadowmuffins consistiing solely of insults....debate to him is spelled:

MEADOWMUFFINS

^watch^

he will go ape over that word

Tell me something , sweetpea.....can you actually REFUTE ANYTHING in the post I link using logic and/or facts? If so, please demonstrate...if not, continue to bray like an ass....either is entertaining to a rational adult.
 
you mean, like I did on the abortion statistics thread?....

Oh, you mean where you just dismiss out of hand source material because you have an ideological opposition or personal dislike for the author(s)? Yeah, real smart and mature on your part, bunky.

You want to debate that other issue, then go back to that thread and continue, as I left the door open. You want to debate what I put here, then do so. Otherwise, stop being a little wussy stamping your feet in frustration, and following me around spewing sour grapes, because quite frankly I'm embarassed for you. Continue with the BS you'll be ignored, lie and I humiliate you. The choice is yours.
 
The Iraq war wasn't based on lies, unless you are referring to those told by Saddam Hussein. *shrug*

Still in denial on that one, Southie? Here's a homework assignment for you....logically and factually disprove JUST ONE item from the following website. Remember, FACTS and the logic derived from them, NOT your worthless opinion, supposition and/or conjecture. If you can't meet a simple challenge, then don't waste time and space with your bullshit.
www.bushlies.net
 
Still in denial on that one, Southie? Here's a homework assignment for you....logically and factually disprove JUST ONE item from the following website. Remember, FACTS and the logic derived from them, NOT your worthless opinion, supposition and/or conjecture. If you can't meet a simple challenge, then don't waste time and space with your bullshit.
www.bushlies.net
You said the Iraq war was based on lies, and I'm assuming that you mean by Bush. What were they?
 
and how stupid are the Democrats who voted the LIES, eh..
Wouldn't that make them liars as well, unless liberals use a different standard for themselves...

But I'd like to have a specific pitch from Taichi on this so I can hit it back at him, straight and fast, at neck height....
 
nope, nothing inspiring at all...more like foot stomping, childish chest thumping screeching is what I would call it..

thats_the_pot_calling_the_kettle_black.jpg
 
Oh, you mean where you just dismiss out of hand source material because you have an ideological opposition or personal dislike for the author(s)?

nope, I mean the one where I proved Christie's claim about the CDC was not true, then proved that your claim about Kaiser was not true, then proved that your claim about Guttmacher wasn't true....I'm still waiting for you to come out of hiding....
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Oh, you mean where you just dismiss out of hand source material because you have an ideological opposition or personal dislike for the author(s)?

nope, I mean the one where I proved Christie's claim about the CDC was not true, then proved that your claim about Kaiser was not true, then proved that your claim about Guttmacher wasn't true....I'm still waiting for you to come out of hiding....

What did I tell you, genius? Stop being a little wussy, go back to the original thread and PROVE your case there by discussing ALL the material offered for comparison and discussion. Stamping your widdle feet here and claiming victory after victory doesn't mean a God damned thing if you're not willing to have an honest, thorough discussion at the source. But we both know that you have a limited compacity for that. So if you're NOT willing to discuss what I put forth on THIS particular subject thread, I'll just ignore you.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Still in denial on that one, Southie? Here's a homework assignment for you....logically and factually disprove JUST ONE item from the following website. Remember, FACTS and the logic derived from them, NOT your worthless opinion, supposition and/or conjecture. If you can't meet a simple challenge, then don't waste time and space with your bullshit.
www.bushlies.net

You said the Iraq war was based on lies, and I'm assuming that you mean by Bush. What were they?

Either you didn't go to the site and READ CAREFULLY AND COMPREHENSIVELY as to the categories covered (a whole section on Iraq, WMD, etc.) or you're just being a stubborn asshole incapable of handling/admitting the truth. I told you don't waste time with your BS....and that's just what you did. You're done.
 
Either you didn't go to the site and READ CAREFULLY AND COMPREHENSIVELY as to the categories covered (a whole section on Iraq, WMD, etc.) or you're just being a stubborn asshole incapable of handling/admitting the truth. I told you don't waste time with your BS....and that's just what you did. You're done.
I want you to pick one and pitch it out, give it your best shot, again so I can hit it back at you fast and head-high. :)
 
I want you to pick one and pitch it out, give it your best shot, again so I can hit it back at you fast and head-high. :)

YOU made a claim, I provided proof to the contrary. It is up to YOU to DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK and now disprove my source information. That's one of your problems Southie, when you suspect that you can't prove your point, you suddenly can't read, become totally lazy and/or incapable of comprehending what you read. The site has an entire section devoted to Iraq and the WMD's, the challenge to YOU is to disprove JUST ONE item out of the batch. I'm making it EASY for you...YOU choose what you think is a comfortable win. So stop stalling and get your ass in gear, or make up some lame excuse/cop-out so we can all move on.

www.bushlies.net
 
What did I tell you, genius? Stop being a little wussy, go back to the original thread and PROVE your case there by discussing ALL the material offered for comparison and discussion. Stamping your widdle feet here and claiming victory after victory doesn't mean a God damned thing if you're not willing to have an honest, thorough discussion at the source. But we both know that you have a limited compacity for that. So if you're NOT willing to discuss what I put forth on THIS particular subject thread, I'll just ignore you.

what you "put forward in THIS thread" is that neocons should wake up and confront you......so I did....the fact that we showed up and slapped you around for a while ought to show you we're awake....now, if you've got something specific that you care to indulge in, we'd be glad to slap you around some more.....
 
this whole thread is gay, but taichiliberal is exra gay for using red font.

Grow up, dick cheezer, red font is gay. You might as well use pink.
 
Back
Top