Was the verdict unjust?

Big Money

New member
A man shot and killed a teenaged youth.

He claimed self-defense and was acquitted by a jury.

Was the verdict unjust?
 
I'm glad someone asked this question because this has been a topic this board has been too scare to touch. It's amazing it took a new poster with no prior knowledge of this board to have the guts to bring this up.
 
I'm glad someone asked this question because this has been a topic this board has been too scare to touch. It's amazing it took a new poster with no prior knowledge of this board to have the guts to bring this up.

I think Patriot was hoping one of the more liberal posters would jump in assuming the discussion was about Zimmerman. The story he linked is not Zimmie.
 
i don't care what the "law" says or if the accused didn't actually "do anything illegal." My feels tell me they should be in jail, and I believe our justice system should run off of my feels.
 
So, you are employing the same method you used in the Zimmerman case.

actually I am parodying you and others. the law is pretty clear. that's why he was found not guilty. suck on that.

Zimmerman - still not guilty.. 2 weeks and change later.
Baxter.. still not over it... 2 weeks and change later.
 
I read the linked article. I assume you are correct when you said the jury ruled not guilty. I saw nothing in the article that would make me disagree with the jury. So no, based on what I've read here, the verdict was not unjust, IMO.
 
Thank you for finding this story, I'd forgetten the name of the defendant and been unable to find it.
 
A man shot and killed a teenaged youth.

He claimed self-defense and was acquitted by a jury.

Was the verdict unjust?

No specifics on this case you speak of........did he stare at the kid for a minute and 20 seconds from a car then run after him for 20 seconds? Because in the rain, that would creep anyone out. Yawn.
 
I doubt any jury would have ignored a bullet hole in the back.

I would have to see the evidence in the case.
 
Back
Top