Was Trayvon a Dope dealing Thug of a Burglar?

baxter has turned into a grade A kneejerk contrarion dipshit. he used to be one of the most level headed and thought inspiring posters on here, bar none. Then he had a skitzo break with reality and has never been the same.
 
ok so msnbc, foxnews, cnn, all of sanford and plenty of other of municipalities, people like poet, and people familiar with history are all racists.

You are being way to vague.

The media pumps out what sells like any other market producer. They are not publishing things based on what they think is likely. They produce content for frightened old people and little pukes, like you. They are constantly hyping false fears.

Poet seemed to be responding to repeated demands for comment on the fears of racist losers like dy.

Sanford was probably trying to calm the fears of old racist farts and little pukes.

No one familiar with history thought there would be any riots. That all came from racists who downplayed the long history of racism and brutality in the LAPD to blame the King riots on some imagined incivility of African Americans.
 
baxter has turned into a grade A kneejerk contrarion dipshit. he used to be one of the most level headed and thought inspiring posters on here, bar none. Then he had a skitzo break with reality and has never been the same.

Bullshit, my short break is all over.

You are the kneejerk who clearly stated that your position had a reactionary basis. You deny the reality of racism.
 
no I am not denying anything. I am just saying that the people thinking that riots were a possibility were not some extremist racist faction. It was a very mainstream thought and concern by people on all sides.
 
Last edited:
no I am denying nothing. I am just saying that the people thinking that riots were a possibility was not some extremist racist notion. It was a very mainstream thought and concern by people on all sides.

You are employing a strawman. Isolated "riots" were always a possibility. That there was a likelihood (or a strong likelihood as I should have said) of widespread riots was based on nothing but racism and these clowns were really hoping for a race war. Read sjj's post where he fantasizes about how it would play out. The racists did not reference OWS or Tea Party demonstrations that got out of hand. They referenced the King riots and the reason was obvious. This case was unlike the King case and the connection is based on an insulated view of those riots that pretends the only issue was race.
 
You are employing a strawman. Isolated "riots" were always a possibility. That there was a likelihood (or a strong likelihood as I should have said) of widespread riots was based on nothing but racism and these clowns were really hoping for a race war. Read sjj's post where he fantasizes about how it would play out. The racists did not reference OWS or Tea Party demonstrations that got out of hand. They referenced the King riots and the reason was obvious. This case was unlike the King case and the connection is based on an insulated view of those riots that pretends the only issue was race.
I was right in the middle of the Rodney King riots, where I managed a restaurant and the cops had us close up 3 hours early at 7:00pm. As I drove home, I could see all those blazes off the 91 Freeway, while carrying my big nine on my front seat. I sure did not want to be another Reginald Denny who had his head caved-in by another thug wantabe, this one named "Football". "FootBall was later convicted of murder, of course maybe he was profiled because he was a Black Mo""""Fu""""............................
 
You are employing a strawman. Isolated "riots" were always a possibility

it's not a strawman. I am not talking about isolated riots. the mainstream media were talking about widescale riots, or riots of significant measure that would warrant a mention.

That there was a likelihood (or a strong likelihood as I should have said) of widespread riots was based on nothing but racism

and you are basing this assertion on what? Again, it was all the media was talking about for weeks. Don't act like it was some extremist racist notion, it wasn't. You trying to add modifiers (widespread, isolated,) doesn't change that. The media talked about the possability of riots. Rodney king level was often alluded to.
 
There are speculations that Trayvon Martin was making a drug deal at that 7/11 store and that he was smoking dope when Zimmer saw him, that 7/11 video sure looked suspicious. Zimmer did say that he saw Trayvon throw away a "cigarette", and there was Marijuana in Trayvon's system, according to the autopsy. Let's face it, Trayvon was a thug wantabe and that is why he attacked Zimmer, trying to act all tough and sheet to impress Rachel, who was on the phone. The web photos of Trayvon holding a gun, and his Marijuana plant shows me that Trayvon might have been a drug dealer, also he may have been part of the burglary ring that was "working" those condos/apartments. Trayvon routinely refereed street fights and he was admittedly into MMA, aka "Ground an Pound". Trayvon was Kicked out of school for 10 days for having Marijuana in his backpack and they also found a bunch of women's jewelry on him, tell me about it. You Pro-Trayvon fools need to wake up and smell the coffee, if there is a trial, all this sheet will come out because Trayvon will then be 18 years of age and not a protected minor no moore. Victory is sweet, Mensa rules, he who laughs last, laughs longest..TOUCHE'

The only kid here is you....

Trayvon wasn't doing anything wrong and Zimmerman stared at him for over a minute, jumped out of his vehicle and followed him when Trayvon tried to exit the situation. Everyone at that age thinks they are tough and I've seen MULTIPLE old High School friends that use to do hard drugs criticizing Trayvon for weed, when they did much worse.

I use to fist fight and thought it was the way of life because I was Country. I had a pistol when I was 13. I knew fighting was fighting and weapons is the line where the least educated step in the situation. I still fought.

The only difference between me and Trayvon I see is that he smoked pot.

Your entire post just makes you look like a racist moron. I find it funny that even Libertarians hate Trayvon when they fight for Liberty and this exposes Liberty is only important when certain people have it.
 
it's not a strawman. I am not talking about isolated riots. the mainstream media were talking about widescale riots, or riots of significant measure that would warrant a mention.



and you are basing this assertion on what? Again, it was all the media was talking about for weeks. Don't act like it was some extremist racist notion, it wasn't. You trying to add modifiers (widespread, isolated,) doesn't change that. The media talked about the possability of riots. Rodney king level was often alluded to.

I think it was parents' plea of no violence that moved people to protest in peace.

These same parents have been very gracious in the face of the jury's decision.
 
The only kid here is you....

Trayvon wasn't doing anything wrong and Zimmerman stared at him for over a minute, jumped out of his vehicle and followed him when Trayvon tried to exit the situation. Everyone at that age thinks they are tough and I've seen MULTIPLE old High School friends that use to do hard drugs criticizing Trayvon for weed, when they did much worse.

I use to fist fight and thought it was the way of life because I was Country. I had a pistol when I was 13. I knew fighting was fighting and weapons is the line where the least educated step in the situation. I still fought.

The only difference between me and Trayvon I see is that he smoked pot.

Your entire post just makes you look like a racist moron. I find it funny that even Libertarians hate Trayvon when they fight for Liberty and this exposes Liberty is only important when certain people have it.

I guess Trayvon's thinking was in error and he wasn't as tough as he thought he was.
 
I guess Trayvon's thinking was in error and he wasn't as tough as he thought he was.

Great post there kid. Now explain how Trayvons actions got him shot. Explain what Trayvons actions were that caused Zimmerman to stalk him.

Then explain any laws that allow Zimmerman to exit a vehicle and run after someone they don't know is guilty.

Waiting kid.

Stalking is not ok. Talking on the phone in the rain is kiddo.
 
it's not a strawman. I am not talking about isolated riots. the mainstream media were talking about widescale riots, or riots of significant measure that would warrant a mention.



and you are basing this assertion on what? Again, it was all the media was talking about for weeks. Don't act like it was some extremist racist notion, it wasn't. You trying to add modifiers (widespread, isolated,) doesn't change that. The media talked about the possability of riots. Rodney king level was often alluded to.

I am not adding shit. You simply misrepresented my point.

Riot is a subjective term and some have tried to claim the mild disturbances in Oakland were riots. Any protests have a potential for that. I am talking about widespread disorder.

What is your argument for expecting that?
 
I'm actually surprised there were no major riots. Says a lot about how far we've come since 1992, even given the fact that Trayvon's murder was far more extreme than the abuse visited upon King.
 
Great post there kid. Now explain how Trayvons actions got him shot. Explain what Trayvons actions were that caused Zimmerman to stalk him.

Then explain any laws that allow Zimmerman to exit a vehicle and run after someone they don't know is guilty.

Waiting kid.

Stalking is not ok. Talking on the phone in the rain is kiddo.

See, that's where your thinking keeps getting hung up.
He was not stalked and shot.
He was shot, after he assaulted Zimmerman.

T-H-E-R-E
W-A-S
N-O
S-T-A-L-K-I-N-G

Explain to me the law that says when you see someone suspicious, that you're supposed to ignore them?
 
I think it was parents' plea of no violence that moved people to protest in peace.

These same parents have been very gracious in the face of the jury's decision.

this may very well be true.

but in saying this, it implies there could have been a decent chance, if it were not for their pleas.
 
So have you offered a reason for expecting riots?
Every ethnicity/race can or has rioted, but the facts and history prove that "Blacks" riot moore than the other groups when "they" do not get their way, kind of like spoiled bratty Lib kids. The OJ trial, with their minority jury, is a good example of a riot in the making, except that jury "did their thing" and used jury nulification of the facts to prevent a riot.
 
Every ethnicity/race can or has rioted, but the facts and history prove that "Blacks" riot moore than the other groups when "they" do not get their way, kind of like spoiled bratty Lib kids. The OJ trial, with their minority jury, is a good example of a riot in the making, except that jury "did their thing" and used jury nulification of the facts to prevent a riot.

Thank you very much. Suck on that Grind.
 
Thank you very much. Suck on that Grind.
If "they" did riot, they would get the sheet kicked out of them, so that is not a solution. The real solution here is to bust up the street gangs, and that would really help African Americans, then we can tackle the Education problem. Zimmerman trial witness Rachel Jentile was not a stupid person, but she sounded that way because she spoke using Black Ebonics. Way back on the Old Board, I posted how the Oakland California School Board wanted to teach Ebonics in school, all true, luckily that was "shot" down by the higher-ups.
 
Back
Top