Welcome to the Above Plain Politics Forum

WinterBorn said:
Insults are not against the rules. Flaming and insults are different things.

What was it he said? Did he call her some nasty name?
Click to expand...
I linked to your, er, that other poster's comment earlier today.

I didn't ask you if it was against the rules, just if you thought it was what a gentleman should say to another in a debate. *shrug*
 
Southern Man said:
I linked to your, er, that other poster's comment earlier today.

I didn't ask you if it was against the rules, just if you thought it was what a gentleman should say to another in a debate. *shrug*
Click to expand...

:lol:

I didn't look at the link before. But that was funny.

And I didn't see where he said how she would be keeping it warm. It could be that she would offer a mitten to cover it or something. You could even say it was calling your wife a good samaritan.

:lol:

But that was a funny comeback to your insult.
 
WinterBorn said:
:lol:

I didn't look at the link before. But that was funny.

And I didn't see where he said how she would be keeping it warm. It could be that she would offer a mitten to cover it or something. You could even say it was calling your wife a good samaritan.

:lol:

But that was a funny comeback to your insult.
Click to expand...
Imagine, you making lame excuses for "him" and thinking "he" was funny. *shrug*
 
Southern Man said:
Imagine, you making lame excuses for "him" and thinking "he" was funny. *shrug*
Click to expand...

If something is funny its funny.

And, like I said, it could be viewed as calling your wife a good samaritan. Otherwise you would be suggesting that she would stand idly by and watch a man get frost bite and possibly lose an appendage.
 
Southern Man said:
Lame. Don't mention it again.
Click to expand...

Oh? Is that a veiled threat?

You are the one who has constantly brought up old posts, old posters, and other junk.

I think the idea that your wife would help a man not freeze body parts is admireable.
 
Fish said:
Without a ban on personal attacks, name calling, and cross thread quoting/paraphrasing this forum is a big waste of time.
Click to expand...

Exactly...the rules on harassment is too subjective. When a thread becomes a the playground for capping on those you don't like you have to ask the valid question "why post in this part of the forum?" It's a mockery to call it Above Plain Politics. Really, where is the difference from the rest of the board?
 
Southern Man said:
Now if you could just learn to shut your mouth instead of responding to every post...
Click to expand...

Coming from you, that is funny as hell.

You have talked about me (and another poster) not giving up and never letting go. And yet you are in it just as much and post just as often.
 
WinterBorn said:
Coming from you, that is funny as hell.

You have talked about me (and another poster) not giving up and never letting go. And yet you are in it just as much and post just as often.
Click to expand...
According to the stats you post over 20% more frequently than I do. *shrug*
 
Southern Man said:
According to the stats you post over 20% more frequently than I do. *shrug*
Click to expand...

I guess I have a lot to say on a variety of topics.

How about running all the stats and letting me know how often you think I should be allowed to post.

I promise I will read it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top