We're a pro-choice nation

BartenderElite

Verified User
And getting more so. Close to 60% consistently in polls support a woman's right to choose.

Everyone has the same goal: make abortions rare.

But keep them legal. It's middle ages stuff to ban them.
 
And getting more so. Close to 60% consistently in polls support a woman's right to choose.

Everyone has the same goal: make abortions rare.

But keep them legal. It's middle ages stuff to ban them.

Wrong we are not a pro-choice nation. Sonn you will have to buy an EV there is no choice. A mother killing her child is not a choice it is barbaric and a terrible action taken by the doctor and the Mother

Democrats want abortion right up to birth. The do not want them rare since that would hurt their wonderful Planned Parent hood

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/backlash-builds-after-democrats-vote-legalize-abortion-until-birth
 
Surely, after recent events NOBODY quotes Fox ' news ' anymore. It's an acknowledged disinformation branch of the Murdoch Mendacity Media.
 
And getting more so. Close to 60% consistently in polls support a woman's right to choose.

Everyone has the same goal: make abortions rare.

But keep them legal. It's middle ages stuff to ban them.

sixty million dead children is not "rare"......I can agree with that middle ages remark, though........by then the world had become civilized enough that killing children was considered barbarian......
 
sixty million dead children is not "rare"......I can agree with that middle ages remark, though........by then the world had become civilized enough that killing children was considered barbarian......

It still is considered barbaric.

As for life still to be born or not born, it's true abortion became illegal under religious dominated law in the Middle Ages, but it became legal and widely practiced in some states in the early years of the country and it was widely practiced in Native American tribes. Where it was not practiced even children had the sense to know what "children" are.
 
It still is considered barbaric.

As for life still to be born or not born, it's true abortion became illegal under religious dominated law in the Middle Ages, but it became legal and widely practiced in some states in the early years of the country and it was widely practiced in Native American tribes. Where it was not practiced even children had the sense to know what "children" are.
Why are you posting the same post twice, Marty?

Posting your dumb posts once is more than enough, Marty.
 
And getting more so. Close to 60% consistently in polls support a woman's right to choose.

Everyone has the same goal: make abortions rare.

But keep them legal. It's middle ages stuff to ban them.

The claim by Republicans that life is sacred and begins at conception is completely situational.

If they start losing elections and start to permanently alienate Gen X and women, they will begin to quietly tip-toe away from radical abortion bans in the same way they quietly tip-toed away from all their efforts to make constitutional amendments banning gay marriage.
 
It still is considered barbaric.

As for life still to be born or not born, it's true abortion became illegal under religious dominated law in the Middle Ages, but it became legal and widely practiced in some states in the early years of the country and it was widely practiced in Native American tribes. Where it was not practiced even children had the sense to know what "children" are.

civilized nations do not kill their unborn children.........it's as simple as that.....
 
The abortion pill is a great example of how irrational some of the arguments can be.

How could anyone oppose that? The cells that have developed at that point are microscopic. As far from sentience and cognitive development as a skin cell.

I remember reading an article about a pharmacist in the south who tried to stop selling birth control pills because he was pro life. It gets to a level of absurdity.
 
The further Republicans push this, the more Democrats are going to win...

Hey, I get it. Sometimes something is so morally wrong, it is better to lose while fighting it, than to win while giving in to it. But make no mistake about it, this is a loser for Republicans.

Side point, if abortion is murder, then shouldn't it be illegal even when it is a 12 year old rape victim? So why aren't Republicans loudly saying they are against 12 year old rape victims getting abortions?
 
The claim by Republicans that life is sacred and begins at conception is completely situational.

If they start losing elections and start to permanently alienate Gen X and women, they will begin to quietly tip-toe away from radical abortion bans in the same way they quietly tip-toed away from all their efforts to make constitutional amendments banning gay marriage.

Like everything else they pretend to believe in.
 
And getting more so. Close to 60% consistently in polls support a woman's right to choose.

Everyone has the same goal: make abortions rare.

But keep them legal. It's middle ages stuff to ban them.

It's not "pro-choice". That's a leftist narrative. It's pro-death and murder. Of course, when your ideology is all about societal decline, murdering unborn children makes perfect sense. Much like pretending men can be women. :laugh:
 
Surely, after recent events NOBODY quotes Fox ' news ' anymore. It's an acknowledged disinformation branch of the Murdoch Mendacity Media.

Anyone who believes that CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS. NBC and NPR are not about disinformation is a mentally challenged halfwit. Russia collusion. The Covid HOAX. Fox is one of the few networks that even attempts to be sane or factual.

The reason you are a leftist mental case with a severely retarded IQ is that you think MSNBC is news. Moron.
 
It still is considered barbaric.

As for life still to be born or not born, it's true abortion became illegal under religious dominated law in the Middle Ages, but it became legal and widely practiced in some states in the early years of the country and it was widely practiced in Native American tribes. Where it was not practiced even children had the sense to know what "children" are.

Another pointless post. You're quite full of them. :palm:
 
The claim by Republicans that life is sacred and begins at conception is completely situational.

If they start losing elections and start to permanently alienate Gen X and women, they will begin to quietly tip-toe away from radical abortion bans in the same way they quietly tip-toed away from all their efforts to make constitutional amendments banning gay marriage.

The lie filled bullshit is strong in this halfwit. :lolup:
 
And getting more so. Close to 60% consistently in polls support a woman's right to choose.

Everyone has the same goal: make abortions rare.

But keep them legal. It's middle ages stuff to ban them.

there should be only 3 situations where abortion should be an available choice.

1. life of the mother at stake.
2. rape or incest
3. severe debilitation of the baby

other than that, nobody took away a choice. the man and woman made their choice in consensual sex that they KNEW could result in pregnancy
 
there should be only 3 situations where abortion should be an available choice.

1. life of the mother at stake.
2. rape or incest
3. severe debilitation of the baby

other than that, nobody took away a choice. the man and woman made their choice in consensual sex that they KNEW could result in pregnancy

Why do you care if someone has an abortion?
 
there should be only 3 situations where abortion should be an available choice.

1. life of the mother at stake.
2. rape or incest
3. severe debilitation of the baby

other than that, nobody took away a choice. the man and woman made their choice in consensual sex that they KNEW could result in pregnancy

I almost agree with you here. If only you had said there should be only 4 situations. The fourth which I would add would be:

If the person in who's body the pregnancy is happening just wants an abortion.

Then your list would make sense.
 
Back
Top