We're a pro-choice nation

Uncensored2008 said:
Is "she" also free to terminate the life of a domestic partner occurring in "her" own house?
Click to expand...

NO. And only a fucking moron would see any equivalence between the two scenarios.

You of the fascist left seek to prey upon the most defenseless in society.
Click to expand...

You of the moronic, hypocritical, racist, misogynistic American Right can go fuck yourselves...which is probably the only actual fucking you people ever get.

I know, it's because they can't fight back.
Click to expand...

Jeez, I with I had read that, "I know..." first, because then I would have realized everything written by you is bullshit.

Okay, ball in your court!

hysterical-laughter.gif
 
Frank Apisa said:
NO. And only a fucking moron would see any equivalence between the two scenarios.
Click to expand...

Why not? Do you oppose the "right" of women to "choose" to terminate the life of others?

You of the moronic, hypocritical, racist, misogynistic American Right can go fuck yourselves...which is probably the only actual fucking you people ever get.
Click to expand...

I understand that when you ghouls slaughter the innocent - you target girls above boys. Coupled with your open assault on women even existing - with the vile "erase and replace" agenda of your shameful party, you're in no position to call others "misogynistic," Herr Comrade.

Have you had an abortion? I mean, your filthy Reich claims that anything a woman can do, a man can do better - including getting pregnant and ostensibly sacrificing the baby to Moloch through the holy sacrament of abortion.


Jeez, I with I had read that, "I know..." first, because then I would have realized everything written by you is bullshit.

Okay, ball in your court!
Click to expand...

You do tend to prey on the most helpless and defenseless members of society.

Infants and the elderly are who those like you tend to want to kill.
 
Stone said:
Its always been odd to me the little lies those who support abortion tell themselves and the lengths they will go to attempting to thread the needle. Do people REALLY not know that abortion is mostly driven by politics? A strong welfare state MUST exist for the left to survive politically. Without abortion the welfare state would have been absolutely slashed and gutted years ago to avoid complete and total collapse. No welfare state= no votes. These people are perfectly willing to KILL millions of unborn children to stay in power. THAT is the absolute truth of it. Always remember who you are dealing with.
Click to expand...

Or, some people just believe in women's rights.

There's that too.
 
Stone said:
Its always been odd to me the little lies those who support abortion tell themselves and the lengths they will go to attempting to thread the needle. Do people REALLY not know that abortion is mostly driven by politics? A strong welfare state MUST exist for the left to survive politically. Without abortion the welfare state would have been absolutely slashed and gutted years ago to avoid complete and total collapse. No welfare state= no votes. These people are perfectly willing to KILL millions of unborn children to stay in power. THAT is the absolute truth of it. Always remember who you are dealing with.
Click to expand...

Total bullshit drivel as usual, Stoner.

The right merely wants to delay abortion until the kids are school age and can be aborted with AR-15s.
Why bother to deny it? it couldn't be more obvious. You're fooling nobody.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Why not? Do you oppose the "right" of women to "choose" to terminate the life of others?
Click to expand...

If you think the two things are comparable...fine with me. I understand it. You seem like a moron...and a moron might well see them as comparable.



I understand that when you ghouls slaughter the innocent - you target girls above boys. Coupled with your open assault on women even existing - with the vile "erase and replace" agenda of your shameful party, you're in no position to call others "misogynistic," Herr Comrade.
Click to expand...

Whew. You gotta get some control, Uncensored. You are playing way too close to the edge.

Have you had an abortion? I mean, your filthy Reich claims that anything a woman can do, a man can do better - including getting pregnant and ostensibly sacrificing the baby to Moloch through the holy sacrament of abortion.
Click to expand...

But I don't have a Reich...let alone a "filthy" one.

Get control, Man.




You do tend to prey on the most helpless and defenseless members of society.
Click to expand...

Me? I do not prey on anyone.

Get control.


Infants and the elderly are who those like you tend to want to kill.
Click to expand...

Ummm...as most here know...I am 86 years old...gonna be 87 in August. I do not want to pick on the elderly. And the last thing in the world I want is to pick on infants.

Here is my position: If a woman with a pregnancy occurring in her own body wants to terminate that pregnancy, she should be able to do so legally...and with the aid of a physician and medical facility.
 
Frank Apisa said:
Here is my position: If a woman with a pregnancy occurring in her own body wants to terminate that pregnancy, she should be able to do so legally...and with the aid of a physician and medical facility.
Click to expand...

I shouldn't criticize because I do the same thing myself, but

Frank,

you're casting pearls at swine.

They will never admit that they favor abortion by AR-15 once the "fetuses" are school age.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
I shouldn't criticize because I do the same thing myself, but

Frank,

you're casting pearls at swine.

They will never admit that they favor abortion by AR-15 once the "fetuses" are school age.
Click to expand...

You are correct...they will never do so.

But I am here for the laughs...and if you do not engage those morons, where is the real fun.

Anyway...these swine don't need pearl tossed to them. Breadcrumbs work to get them to crawl out.
 
Earl said:
Nonsense, Marty…the phrase, ”unborn children” is perfect English.

(d) As used in this section, the term “unborn child” means a child in utero, and the term “child in utero” or “child, who is in utero” means a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb.”

Get a clue, Marty. Go and complete elementary school…Marty.
Click to expand...

"As used in this section...". As used in the United States and before that in the Colonies, abortion was often criminalized but never as homicide whereas the deliberate taking of human life, including a child's, except when taken by a justice system, was always criminalized as a homicide.
 
Frank Apisa said:
There is no child in the woman.



Maybe. But a woman with a pregnancy occurring in her own body should have the choice to terminate that pregnancy. People like you should not be able to dictate to her that she not have that right.
Click to expand...

Yes there is you do not understand science
 
ptif219 said:
It could mean that if you allowed the Chicken to sit on the egg
Click to expand...

Cracking an egg is not "killing a chicken."

Crushing an acorn is not "killing an oak tree."

Choosing an abortion is not "killing a child."

Those thoughts are part of the problem; people like you...are part of the problem.
 
A dead child is the result of an abortion.

A death certificate is required.

An unborn child must be alive to be killed.

An ultra-sound shows the live child moving.

The child that was killed by abortion had a brain, lungs, extremities and a beating, living heart...until it was killed.
 
Last edited:
Earl said:
A dead child is the result of an abortion.
Click to expand...

The result of most abortions is the expulsion of a cell mass. There is no dead child.

A death certificate is required.
Click to expand...

A death certificate is required in some venues...where conservative morons are powerful.

An unborn child must be alive to be killed.
Click to expand...

Anything "unborn" is not alive.

The child that was killed by abortion had a brain, lungs, extremities and a beating, living heart...until it was killed.
Click to expand...

Most abortions are merely the expulsion of a cell mass. There is no child...and there is no killing.
 
A dead child is the result of an abortion.

A death certificate is required.

An unborn child must be alive to be killed.

An ultra-sound shows the live child moving.


The child that was killed by abortion had a brain, lungs, extremities and a beating, living heart...until it was killed.
 
Last edited:
Earl said:
A dead child is the result of an abortion.
Click to expand...

The result of most abortions is the expulsion of a cell mass. There is no dead child.

A death certificate is required.
Click to expand...

A death certificate is required in some venues...where conservative morons are powerful. Not in all venues.

An unborn child must be alive to be killed.
Click to expand...

Anything "unborn" is not alive.

An ultra-sound shows the live child moving.


The child that was killed by abortion had a brain, lungs, extremities and a beating, living heart...until it was killed.
Click to expand...

As I said, "The result of most abortions is the expulsion of a cell mass. There is no dead child."
 
A dead child is the result of an abortion.

A death certificate is required.

An unborn child must be alive to be killed.

An ultra-sound shows the live child moving.




The child that was killed by abortion had a brain, lungs, extremities and a beating, living heart...until it was killed.
 
Frank Apisa said:
The result of most abortions is the expulsion of a cell mass. There is no dead child.



A death certificate is required in some venues...where conservative morons are powerful. Not in all venues.



Anything "unborn" is not alive.



As I said, "The result of most abortions is the expulsion of a cell mass. There is no dead child."
Click to expand...

Dumbbells like Earl play with words in lieu of understanding them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top