Old Trapper
Verified User
Again, Trump never said that. He said that there were nice folks on both sides of the issue, history preservationists vs. statue haters. Either your assuming that preservationists are all White Supremacists or you lack reading comprehension. So which is it?
Again with the usual stupidity, and lack of comprehension. Nothing else to be expected from the mindless right wing. Now we call race baiters, racists, etc., "preservationists", and those who oppose the statues that were placed around the area long after the Civil War as a celebration of racism, as "statue haters". Really quite childish, and a demonstration of the low IQ that permeates the right wing Trump supporters. Then too, in your support of stupidity you want others to believe that simply because he said there were "nice people" on both sides of the issue that somehow that eliminates the idea that he said some of the White Supremacists were "nice people".
In answer to your fallacious question, yes, all of what you now call "history preservationists" are of the White Supremacist mentality, and that would include the KKK, White Nationalists, etc. The ones that it would not include would be honest historians if any support the erection of the statues of which I have heard of none. If you know of a group, or even an individual, that supports the statues that is not of the racist mentality then please post their site, or whatever fantasy website you might have.
https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/20...ments-history-charlottesville-white-supremacy
"The debate over Confederate monuments has been framed by President Donald Trump — and some who share his views — as a fight between those who wish to preserve history and those who would “erase” it. But let us linger on what history we’ll be preserving as long as Confederate memorials stand.
The Confederate monuments in New Orleans; Charlottesville, Virginia; Durham, North Carolina, and elsewhere did not organically pop up like mushrooms. The installation of the 1,000-plus memorials across the US was the result of the orchestrated efforts of white Southerners and a few Northerners with clear political objectives: They tended to be erected at times when the South was fighting to resist political rights for black citizens. The preservation of these monuments has likewise reflected a clear political agenda.
It is going to take equal energy and focus to remove them from the national landscape.
But the story of the monuments is even stranger than many people realize. Few if any of the monuments went through any of the approval procedures that we now commonly apply to public art. Typically, groups like the United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC), which claimed to represent local community sentiment (whether they did or did not), funded, erected, and dedicated the monuments. As a consequence, contemporaries, especially African Americans, who objected to the erection of monuments had no realistic opportunity to voice their opposition.
Most Confederate monuments were, in short, the result of private groups colonizing public space."
Last edited: