That depends entirely on if you believe all those attacks had nothing to do with "Wag the Dog" policy...Nobody died when slick willie lied.
This is also disingenuous.
That depends entirely on if you believe all those attacks had nothing to do with "Wag the Dog" policy...Nobody died when slick willie lied.
When you talk about the war on terror. One is an event, the other is a current war...
To say that means that Iraq is about 9/11 is ridiculous spin...
And the "ally" thing... Please. That's like saying it is Israel's fault when we went into Somalia. They are an ally, but that doesn't mean that they are involved in every action we take. The same could be said of another ally...
These are just silly attempts to associate the two by the opposition, not even one of those says that Iraq was involved in 9/11.
Just for clarification . . .When you talk about the war on terror. One is an event, the other is a current war...
To say that means that Iraq is about 9/11 is ridiculous spin...
And the "ally" thing... Please. That's like saying it is Israel's fault when we went into Somalia. They are an ally, but that doesn't mean that they are involved in every action we take. The same could be said of another ally...
These are just silly attempts to associate the two by the opposition, not even one of those says that Iraq was involved in 9/11.
No, I am saying that they didn't lie while they did. The whole "he lied" thing doesn't fit here.Just for clarification . . .
Are you saying that the administration did not attempt to conflate Iraq with 9/11? It seems to me that, at the time, they were indeed attempting to justify the invasion of Iraq by association with the 9/11/2001 attacks.
Yes, he did. He deliberately mislead people without stating anything that couldn't be factually defended by nit-picking ninnies.No, I am saying that they didn't lie while they did. The whole "he lied" thing doesn't fit here.
won't make any difference with the Bushites Cypress. Even though they claim to no longer support Bush, their words betray their true feelings.
Some of the even go so far as to call themselves Libretarians
But they are still bushites.
Yes, he did. He deliberately mislead people without stating anything that couldn't be factually defended by nit-picking ninnies.
Main Entry: 3 lie
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): lied; ly·ing /'lI-i[ng]/
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English lEogan; akin to Old High German liogan to lie, Old Church Slavic lugati
intransitive verb
1 : to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive
2 : to create a false or misleading impression
transitive verb : to bring about by telling lies <lied his way out of trouble>
-- emphasis added, obviously
Anyone catch that part of todays press conference?
He directly stated from the beginning that there was no evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11, that is not "a misleading impression"...
I get so tired of this inane "he lied" crap. At least point to a place where he did lie rather than this silly "if you interpret it MY way then he is a liar here!" garbage. It is tired, it takes waaaaay too long to explain and it just isn't getting you anywhere. At least point to the "We're sure there are WMD in there!" stuff.
No, I'm pretty sure it wasn't until after bush got his war, that bush publically stated that iraq had nothing to do with the 9/11 attack.