What happened in Oregon will happen nationally after 2020

The OP doesn't require one.

Right, so why respond? Ego.


He wasn't making a statement for both sides.

Yes he was. Read the thread.


You don't get to dictate who gets to respond.

I actually can if I want to; thread ban your shit.

But I don't thread ban because:

a) I'm not an asshole

b) I like provoking things like "elections are irrelevant" and "I want to kill cops" out of Conservatives.
 
i'm going to make this quick and simple. you're wrong. the entire point of the constitution, had you read it, creates the federal government and prescribes them limited and few powers. NOWHERE in that document does it state or give that new federal government the power to define or expand it's powers. anything you say to the contrary is just plain wrong.

Exactly. I don't think LV426 has ever read the Constitution of the United States. I'm convinced he never read the constitution of the State of Oregon either.
 

That does not mean individual districts are not gerrymandered in order to achieve that results.

But, I don't know anything about OR--I was just being sarcastic because that is the lame answer always given by the left for Republican legislative wins. But, I know you have no sense of humor and don't appreciate sarcasm, so let me try again.

The voters of OR did what most voters do in midterm elections and vote against the president's party and because OR is a blue state. Currently the Democrats control 37 chambers of state legislatures and the Republicans hold 61.

Why is that? Because that is how the people voted. Suggesting you know some "deeper" reason is silliness.
 
After Conservatives are thoroughly defeated in 2020, just like they were in 2018, they will do things like enlist violent, right-wing fascist militias as their brownshirts, and use the threat of violence and intimidation on lawmakers who were elected by the voters against the will of these wackos.

Instead of backing down, I think these governors and mayors and politicians should call their bluff and BLAST THEIR TRAITOROUS ASSES TO KINGDOM COME.

With the same intensity they shoot black people, the police should shoot these wingnuts dead.

They are terrorists, after all.

Hardly.....it will happen only in liberal strongholds.....such as the worst coast, the north east, and the upper Midwest. Just as before during the last revolution....the civil war....it will be a democrat generated war as everything the democrats/liberals touch turns to shit. ;)
 
This is exactly why I don't thread-ban.

I can provoke responses like these out of Conservatives.

Well he is usually not that bad, but he just got back.......:)

I don't thread ban either..

What, if I may ask, do you hope to accomplish??
 
You latched onto that as a red herring because you had no fucking answer for the OP.

Because you are obsessive-compulsive, you HAD to respond to me so you could feel better about someone showing you up on a message board, destroying your bothsiderism moderation bullshit.

You could have chosen to just not respond...but you did.

When people declare they are "winning" a message board debate they are in deep denial.
 
There ya go.

Conservatives are unstable and act violently when they lose elections.

Liberals can also get pretty violent when they lose elections:

LV426: "I say forget arresting them and dragging them to do their jobs; just fucking shoot on sight"
LV426: "Open fire. Kill 'em all"
LV426: "BLAST THEIR TRAITOROUS ASSES TO KINGDOM COME."
 
What rights are being removed?

Here's the bill...show your work.

Thank you for providing a link to this bill in question.

* The bill depends on the ability to measure global CO2, which is not possible, and the CO2 emitted by the State of Oregon, which is not possible, and the CO2 emitted by an individual.
* It creates penalties for breathing.
* It makes use of undefined words, such as 'global warming' and 'climate change'.
* Creates a paradox to use the best defined science by denying science.
* Uses the IPCC as a data source, when they have no data.
* Makes a naturally occurring gas in the atmosphere illegal.
* Attempts to usurp State sovereignty over indian nations.
* Makes sewer plants illegal.
* Makes septic tanks illegal.
* Makes swamps illegal.
* Creates a fascism by oligarchy against various energy suppliers.
* Requires the preparation of a 'study' detailing data that does not exist before opening a business.
* Creates a program to plant trees in forested areas, which already have trees, funded by new taxes.
* Creates a program to measure the pH of oceans, which is not possible.
* Creates a program to prevent the acidification of ocean water, when ocean water is not acidic and creates new taxes for this program.
* Requires the artificial production of coal from carbon dioxide.
* Introduces massive amounts of extra paperwork, which much be filed annually for all businesses. This same paperwork requires the use of detailing 'energy burdens', which is not defined in the bill.
* Overrules FAA regulations, interfering with aviation fuel supplies, making them unsafe.
* Overrules NTSB regulations and violates several railroad agreements that are still in force and also interferes with railway right of way.
* Imposes taxes on material moving through the State on railways, waterways, and federal highways, and not sold or traded in the State.
* Overrules US Coast Guard regulations concerning fuel and fueling stations for ports.
* Contains an Ex Post Facto clause, punishing those who have used these systems in the past legally.

That's what I got out of the bill.

* It is unconstitutional to pass laws that are vague and not enforceable.
* It is unconstitutional to implement oligarchies or fascism.
* It is unconstitutional for a State to impose duties or imposts on any import or export from other States beyond inspection costs.
* It is unconstitutional for a State to override federal regulations on interstate commerce.
* It is unconstitutional to pass an Ex Post Facto law.


I really don't blame the conservatives for walking out.
 
I am?

I'm saying the state should respond to the violent threats Conservatives are making towards it.

Exactly. You want the state to use violence against its own citizens who have done nothing illegal. You are advocating the state use of violence.
 
grind this is not an infraction by me and if you pretend it is you will destroy this site



he has created a fantasy that I was raped as a child



It is untrue


I told him to stop imaging the rape of a child to insult me


you will destroy this site if you pretend I am the one who committed an infraction

WHAT THE FLYING FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT YOU STUPID FUCKING CUNT

I never said anything of the sort.

Not even close. That would be a rule 12b violation.

Listen, you fucking dipshit cow, your lies are not going to be tolerated around here anymore.

It's not my fault you think 8 other people on this site are me, and anytime someone says something you dont' like you put it into the "grind" category in your head.

If you ever mention that lie about me again you are getting 100% banned the fuck out, as far as I am concerned.

You need to SORT YOUR OWN shit out and fix your fucking mental disorder that prevents you from properly identifying people.
 
Good question. Since he wants to start a civil war, you'd think he would at least research this basic point.

yea like these basement-dwelling neckbeards in gym shorts

BoA8k96IUAAJodY.jpg
 
WHAT THE FLYING FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT YOU STUPID FUCKING CUNT

I never said anything of the sort.

Not even close. That would be a rule 12b violation.

Listen, you fucking dipshit cow, your lies are not going to be tolerated around here anymore.

It's not my fault you think 8 other people on this site are me, and anytime someone says something you dont' like you put it into the "grind" category in your head.

If you ever mention that lie about me again you are getting 100% banned the fuck out, as far as I am concerned.

You need to SORT YOUR OWN shit out and fix your fucking mental disorder that prevents you from properly identifying people.

Oorah!
 
Back
Top