Well, if they have no intention to act in good faith following the results of the election, then there's no reason to treat them or their arguments fairly today.
What happened in Oregon will happen nationally after 2020
- Thread starter LV426
- Start date
Well, if they have no intention to act in good faith following the results of the election, then there's no reason to treat them or their arguments fairly today.
How'd it work out for you morons at Appomattox?
The part of the story you are deliberately ignoring:
"A spokesperson for the state Senate president told The Associated Press on Friday that the "Oregon State Police has recommended that the Capitol be closed tomorrow due to a possible militia threat."
I've never heard of a peaceful threat before. Sounds like a Nazi goalpost shift that gullible bothsiderists like Flash fall for, predictably.
You mean the KKK that endorsed Donald Trump?
Intersting tactic; sure Conservatives are racists today, but did you know their racist forefathers used to be Democrats?
Flash...the state is 60/40...that's reflected accurately in the representation in the state legislature.
You can't argue that's gerrymandered when the representation closely hews to vote totals.
Callinectes
Proud MAGA Semi-Facist
Considering I was born a Yankee, pretty damn well
SmarterthanYou
rebel
so your position is that if they have no faith in the political system, then you won't place any faith in their position or argument????????
Well, at least you're honest about your ignorance.
Yeah, but they didn't merely win a majority, they dominated and won a super-majority.
And that was all over the country, not just Oregon...Democrats dominated everywhere. It was the largest margin of victory in total vote since the midterm after Watergate.
It's a preview of what will happen next year, just like what the GOP is doing in OR will be a preview of what they will do next year, after they lose significant power.
It's all bad faith.
And what were those totals prior to 2018?
What is the context?
I know you love to abscond context, but you can't when making this argument.
Flash, I asked why did the voters of Oregon decide to hand supermajority control to the Democrats?
Conservatives are dead-enders.
They will never accept the results of any election they lose.
So since they will never operate in good faith, why should we treat them and their arguments fairly?
I think I can get these Conservatives so wound up that they will make a threat that will put them in legal trouble, or reveal something personal about themselves that can lead to a doxxing.
You're the one who argued there is such a thing as a peaceful threat.
We didn't lose the election in OR...we won it.
We didn't lose the election; Conservatives did and are refusing to act in good faith. So, fuck them. They don't want to act in good faith and accept election results, then there's no reason to treat them fairly.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
so you admit that you hope to find a way to invite violence against conservatives, thanks. about time you stood up like a man
SmarterthanYou
rebel
then there's no reason we should show any restraint when you try
OK, so how is measuring something a violation of your rights?
You also didn't cite where in the bill it says your rights are violated...and I even linked the bill to you so you could do that.
You couldn't do that because the bill doesn't do that.
Four full state legislatures saw changes in their supermajority status—typically when one party controls either three-fifths or two-thirds of a chamber—as a result of the 2018 elections. Democrats attained supermajorities in three full state legislatures (both chambers)—California, Illinois, and Oregon.[1] This added to their existing four supermajorities, giving them seven total. Republicans, meanwhile, entered the night with 17 full state legislative supermajorities and lost one—North Carolina.”
There is that.
ballotpedia.com
There is that.
ballotpedia.com