And you dont think they will use the money to send their kids to a private school where they dont have to mix with other kids they deem beneath their childern?
Man you dont understand people very well.
And you dont think they will use the money to send their kids to a private school where they dont have to mix with other kids they deem beneath their childern?
Man you dont understand people very well.
And you dont think they will use the money to send their kids to a private school where they dont have to mix with other kids they deem beneath their childern?
Man you dont understand people very well.
CHANGE, thats the word that gets political supporters standing up and clapping.
So this beggs the question, Change from what?
Has Bush finally killed Cowboy Forign Policy?
Has he finally nailed the last peg into the coffin of patironizing domestic policy?
Bush has destroyed an element of politics, a place that cant be returned to. I think its ignorance and religous fundamentalism, anti-science and pretending to believe things because you just want them to be true. He killed the cancer that resulted in naming things the opposite of what they were... Like "The Patirot Act" and "No Child Left Behind".
What do you think it is that has been destroyed?
What are the voters screaming we change from?
Yup.Neoconservatives.
Both democrats and republicans recognize what they've done to America.
http://www.indypendent.org/2007/05/...rate-dollars-seek-to-redefine-public-schools/
This is the world of education the people who are pressing voucher want our childern in.
We need to consider education a priority and pony up the money it takes to educate all our kids. Our economy needs this as much as our kids need it.
http://www.theurbanchildinstitute.org/Downloads/cucp/school_spending_4-17-07.pdf
We have a much larger percent of low income students to teach and we refuse to pony up the money it will take to properly teach them.
The sad thing is if we pony up the money they will become better tax payers and less of a lifelong burden on the system.
Some dont care about these kids or the long term payoff to the country in tax revenue because they will be dead by the time the country benifits.
Number of students in public school rose 4% between 1970 and 2003.
In 1970 1 in 5 students were Low Income.
In 2003 2 in 3 students were Low Income.
In 1970 we spent about 40% more on 20% of childern in public school whereas in 2003 we spend 40% more on 60% fo the children in public school.
What part of this do you not undestand?
We have more kids who need education that costs more to provide.
When your home insurance goes up do you refuse to pay it?
No you act like an adult and shop for the best deal that covers you as fully as you need.
This is what we need to do with education. Act like an adult and help the rest of us who truely care about this issue shop and pay the bill.
You can pretend all day long that there is a way to do it with yesterdays costs or grow up and face the facts.
The people who are proposing to let the free market into the education system just want it weakened to provide cheap workers with little hope of a better life.
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/fyi/teachers.ednews/05/01/california.schools.disrepair.reut/index.html
Read this and then realize its not just California
One of the better ones.The exact reason why people are pushing for change and vouchers are but one part of that.
The reason this is happening is because people like you refuse to pay the taxes needed to fix the system.
Where exactly do you think the waste is in our school system?
Apples and Oranges my friend. The state gets to decide what they will spend their tax money. One of the things that all the states have decided that public education is in the public interest. So they take a percentage of everyones taxes to pay for THE STATES education system. The state is not obligated to create a big welfare system so you can send your kids to private school. Funny how conservatives despise handout still you get to this issue.You take the amount that would be given to the public school system on your childs behalf and let the parents decide what school to give it to.
Or would you prefer the public education system only get what the parents of the kids contributed in taxes? Because that line of logic would eliminate education for many kids.
Apples and Oranges my friend. The state gets to decide what they will spend their tax money. One of the things that all the states have decided that public education is in the public interest. So they take a percentage of everyones taxes to pay for THE STATES education system. The state is not obligated to create a big welfare system so you can send your kids to private school. Funny how conservatives despise handout still you get to this issue.
http://www.indypendent.org/2007/05/...rate-dollars-seek-to-redefine-public-schools/
This is the world of education the people who are pressing voucher want our childern in.
We need to consider education a priority and pony up the money it takes to educate all our kids. Our economy needs this as much as our kids need it.
Apples and Oranges my friend. The state gets to decide what they will spend their tax money. One of the things that all the states have decided that public education is in the public interest. So they take a percentage of everyones taxes to pay for THE STATES education system. The state is not obligated to create a big welfare system so you can send your kids to private school. Funny how conservatives despise handout still you get to this issue.