What if Obamacare is voted down by the Supreme Court?

The liberals proof that the mandate will work.

Cartoon-Circular-reasoning-works-because.jpg
 
SF is hung up on fat people, what would he do about people who are born with problems, like cystic fibrosis? Or what about the young cancer patients? What about people like Cheney who have hereditary illnesses? Not all illnesses are caused by obesity. My friend weighs much more than I but does not suffer from high cholesterol or high blood pressure, her mother weighs over three hundred pounds and arthritis is her only ailment. Obesity can cause illness, but not always. My dad has never been overweight but has suffered from high cholesterol most of his adult life, and smoked until he was 80, but my mother who ever smoked, never drank, has more medical problems than my dad. I have known people who were very healthy, not overweight, did all the right things and died of heart attacks.




That reminds me of my aunt. She was always overweight and had high blood pressure. She went to the same hospital (family clinic) regularly for check-ups. Over the years the doctors kept telling her she had to lose weight or she'd have a stroke. One day after her check-up I asked her how things went at the doctor and she said the doctor told her, "Your chart tells me you've been overweight and had high blood pressure since your 40's and you're now over 80. Disregard any advice I give you. You win!" :rofl:

She lived to be 87. She was a real "woman's libber" before there were such things. :)
 
Why don't you just answer the question; unless the answer you would have to give makes you uncomfortable?


There are a variety of revenue provisions and I don't really remember them all. So, I'd have to look them up, which is just as easy for me as it would be for you.
 
There are a variety of revenue provisions and I don't really remember them all. So, I'd have to look them up, which is just as easy for me as it would be for you.

You're avoiding this; because you know that the revenue subsidy is going to be raised by demanding more from those who have it, ie: those who are working their asses off.
 
You're avoiding this; because you know that the revenue subsidy is going to be raised by demanding more from those who have it, ie: those who are working their asses off.


If you post the revenue raising provisions I'm not going to disagree that those are the revenue raising provisions. They are what they are. I just don't feel like looking them up when you could just as easily do it.
 
If you post the revenue raising provisions I'm not going to disagree that those are the revenue raising provisions. They are what they are. I just don't feel like looking them up when you could just as easily do it.

You're avoiding this; because you know that the revenue subsidy is going to be raised by demanding more from those who have it, ie: those who are working their asses off.
 
What's good for society reminds me of the Escape From LA movie where The President declares that anyone not conforming to the new "Moral America" laws he creates (banning such things as tobacco, alcoholic beverages, red meat, firearms, profanity, non-Christian religions, atheism and non-marital sex) will be deported to Los Angeles Island or choose death by electrocution as an alternative.

Could you be referring to this clip by any chance?

5:05 - 5:25 :)
 
Back
Top