DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Desh actually brought up a good point in another thread: some national debt is good as it helps the nation build infrastructure. Makes sense, as permanent improvements can be financed easily, since the improvement creates wealth and the ability of citizens to function more efficiently and effectively. "You have to spend money to make money: is an applicable statement. The analogy with personal finance to buy a home is likewise a good analogy.
What she fails at though is that the massive federal debt is not due to spending on infrastructure, but spending on entitlements. These entitlements are not improvements that allow us to function more effectively. Plus they are ongoing- unlike infrastructure which creates a permanent feature from a one-time payment, entitlement spending is ongoing.
The other massive Desh-fail is that she doesn't consider federal dept as a percentage of federal income. Some politicians may sweat about our high debt/ GDP levels, but this number is really useless, since FedCo doesn't have access to all the money made in the country. A useful number to gauge the financial health of a country is the debt/ income ratio.
Again the household analogy is applicable.
"Quite worrisome" has turned to "potential disaster".
source
What she fails at though is that the massive federal debt is not due to spending on infrastructure, but spending on entitlements. These entitlements are not improvements that allow us to function more effectively. Plus they are ongoing- unlike infrastructure which creates a permanent feature from a one-time payment, entitlement spending is ongoing.
The other massive Desh-fail is that she doesn't consider federal dept as a percentage of federal income. Some politicians may sweat about our high debt/ GDP levels, but this number is really useless, since FedCo doesn't have access to all the money made in the country. A useful number to gauge the financial health of a country is the debt/ income ratio.
Again the household analogy is applicable.
While the US is well over that, andFor a family, debt that exceeds three times your annual earnings is starting to become quite worrisome.
has a debt to income measure of 408 percent.
"Quite worrisome" has turned to "potential disaster".
source