What is a healthy debt/ income ratio?

That sounds like a good plan. I am speaking in generalities. 30 years mortgages are a new thing. Debt was frowned upon to in the past. I would rather collect interest than pay it.

The so called income tax deduction is a scam. Let's assume a 25% tax bracket. It is like paying me a dollar so you get a quarter back. It makes no financial sense.

Actually, if the loan rate is at least equal to what your investment yield is, then it does make sense. But in today's environment, my yields are at least double my loan rate.

Let's say I pay $1 in interest and FedCo lets me deduct that, so I effectively paid $0.75. The principle of my loan is made available to invest, and in this example it's double the rate, so I make $2. FedCo taxes you on that so you effectively made $1.50.

It's called leverage. Any increase in value of my real property above that is gravy.
 
why


you people are the ones screaming the debt is too high when dems are in office


but you forget about it when republicans are in office
 
debt is a tool


use a tool wrong and you and can lose your hand


use it correctly and its like having a bigger stronger hand
 
Bullshit. We hired Trump to get a handle on this, and are as loud about it now as any other time. What is your answer?
 
idiot


you crashed the fucking car


Obama had to pay to fix thaat broken car


now why do you never scream about it when your fucks are running up debt
 
Look at the amortization table. Refinance to a 15 if you can afford it. The tax break loses its oomph over time.

I am sure your financial guy is a good guy. But I suspect he reads the same books every financial advisor follows.

I love the freedom of being debt free

without major assests
 
why


you people are the ones screaming the debt is too high when dems are in office


but you forget about it when republicans are in office

When Bush left office the debt was around $10 trillion of which approximately $5 trillion was added when he was President. You lefties called that horrible. When Obama left office, the debt had grown by almost $10 trillion and suddenly twice what you said was horrible wasn't a problem. Why is that?
 
idiot


you crashed the fucking car


Obama had to pay to fix thaat broken car


now why do you never scream about it when your fucks are running up debt


Why do you Obama ass lickers consider the $5 trillion added during the Bush administration bad yet the almost $10 trillion added under Obama not a problem?
 
why do you never admitt most of that went to cleaning up your war built on lies and your crashing of the entire worlds economy?


because you are a dickstrap
 
Debt is useful during a recession, doesn't make any sense to run one now though. We should increase taxes to whatever level necessary to balance the budget. Current levels are unrealistic and have political motivations, Republicans give money away through tax cuts in exchange for votes.
 
Debt is useful during a recession, doesn't make any sense to run one now though. We should increase taxes to whatever level necessary to balance the budget. Current levels are unrealistic and have political motivations, Republicans give money away through tax cuts in exchange for votes.

Democrats have given away money through tax increases in exchange for votes from those that don't pay those taxes.
 
There is a simple formula based upon 30%. If a business cannot sustain a 30% profit from all the goods and or services he provides he is not long for the business world.....the inverted formula should apply to the average working person's debt to income ratio....one should never be indebted by more than 30% of one's total income. Supposedly if one saves 10% (pays himself) 10 cents for every net dollar earned he should have no problem in paying off his debt in totality after a few years of saving (if and when there arose a need or requirement to be debt free).

The same formula for personal savings should apply to any business....one should save 10% of all profit and count it as a personal income.

That's why so many "small businesses" fail each year. If one looks simply at the gross income of any business you would assume that a small business making in access of 3 figures should be solvent...but such is never the case, there are so many variable costs that goes into running a successful business. Number of employees, taxes, overhead like utilities that must be used, transportation costs (shipping) etc.,

If a single owner business takes in about 120K per year...the bottom line would indicate that he/she would be better off simply working for someone else if all one can actually earn after all expenses is less than 30% of the gross.


Now take a look at how "UNCLE SAM" manages the people's wealth....as in reality Uncle Sam Earns NOTHING....every penny that is in the coffers of any government must come from THE PEOPLE the government represents. If UNCLE SAM was a business...he would have been jailed decades ago for the same practices that the management of Enron and Bernie Madoff went to prison for using.

The problem being its a most difficult thing to charge someone with "cooking the books" when the only ones allowed to audit the business are the business managers.


Why is the US 20 trillion in debt? Is it because of a lack of PROFIT (collected taxes)? Hardly. The government entities of the US take is almost 8 trillion dollars annually (a very good debt to income ratio):palm:....yet they can only pay the interest on the accumulated DEBT? Really? What's wrong with this picture? Where is the documented money going? Its going down the proverbial shitter due to mismanagement and the cooking of the books.

CONCLUSION: The United States of America does not have a "tax problem" (as in not having enough tax collected per capita).....the United States of America has a very serious "management problem".....in the wasteful spending of the citizens wealth for the simple reason of not attempting to make the lives of American Citizens better, safe and secure but to purchase enough votes to keep the "career politicians" a place at the HOG TROUGH that is Washington DC.

Common sense would allow anyone with the least amount of critical reasoning abilities to conclude that no LAWYER (as the majority of politicians have direct ties to the US LEGAL SYSTEM) would give up a private practice with the built in potential to make hundreds of thousands in income.....to work as a supposed servant of the people at a fraction of an "honest" wage.

There must be life time "term limits" placed upon all politicians who would engage in the business of representing the people. There should be a constant turn over of NEW FACES every few years...then and only then would the natural human instinct of creed and corruption be curbed and allow the government to function as it was designed to function....in the BEST INTEREST OF THE PEOPLE...et al.,
 
Last edited:
That sounds like a good plan. I am speaking in generalities. 30 years mortgages are a new thing. Debt was frowned upon to in the past. I would rather collect interest than pay it.

The so called income tax deduction is a scam. Let's assume a 25% tax bracket. It is like paying me a dollar so you get a quarter back. It makes no financial sense.

I have the 30-year because it's what I can afford. The low interest rate appeals to me far more than the deduction, and I pay extra every month. Currently, I can only work an extra $50, but, my plan is to raise it a little each year until I am paying several hundred in curtailment. I suppose once I get to that point, I'll be able to afford a 15-year, regardless.
 
debt is a tool


use a tool wrong and you and can lose your hand


use it correctly and its like having a bigger stronger hand

I take the conventional wisdom that debt is, to some extent at least, a tool. At the same time, I'm a casual fan of Dave Ramsey. If you're ever interested in seeing the conventional wisdom challenged, I recommend reading The Total Money Makeover, and locating his show on your local radio. I haven't finished it, yet, but he has advanced stuff beyond that, as much of the info in the book is pretty gee-whiz stuff.
 
I have the 30-year because it's what I can afford. The low interest rate appeals to me far more than the deduction, and I pay extra every month. Currently, I can only work an extra $50, but, my plan is to raise it a little each year until I am paying several hundred in curtailment. I suppose once I get to that point, I'll be able to afford a 15-year, regardless.

Set up bi weekly payments. It is like one extra payment a year.
 
Back
Top