PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
Tertius probably wrote Romans..
.
you're probably wrong about 98% of the things you write about the Bible, since your only sources of theological knowledge are atheist hate sites.......
Tertius probably wrote Romans..
.
"I Tertius, who write the epistle, salute you in the Lord" (Romans 16:22).
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+16&version=NIV22 I, Tertius, who wrote down this letter, greet you in the Lord.
you're probably wrong about 98% of the things you write about the Bible, since your only sources of theological knowledge are atheist hate sites.......
you're probably wrong about 98% of the things you write about the Bible, since your only sources of theological knowledge are atheist hate sites.......
Last time, what is in the Bible is inspired by God, so if Jesus said it that is God.
John 14:9 New King James Version (NKJV)
9 Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and yet you have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; so how can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?
Your foul language doesn't change the fact that you are WRONG
Actually I NEVER use hate sites.. Don't you know the difference?
I have a question for you.. What do you think of the wording "lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil"? Do you think that is correct?
13 And lead us not into temptation,[a]
but deliver us from the evil one.’\
footnotes in NIV
Matthew 6:13 The Greek for temptation can also mean testing.
Matthew 6:13 Or from evil; some late manuscripts one, / for yours is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever. Amen.
I'll ask you a version of the question I asked Wolverine, Ralph:
Is everything you just said a bunch of bullshit...
...or was Jesus a liar?
Jesus was very specific. Not a word, not a letter of a word, not a piece of a letter of a word of the law will change...UNTIL THE EARTH PASSES AWAY.
So either Jesus was lying...or what you asserted in your post makes no sense.
Which do you suppose it is?
I am not wrong...and you do not have the ethical spine to acknowledge that I am not.
Here is what Jesus said about homosexuality:
I DEFY you to add one more word attributed to Jesus about homosexuality to that list.
I DEFY YOU!
(Cue the quotes from Paul and John, because there are none coming from Jesus!)
Your query depends upon your position. Do you assume the Holy Scriptures to be BS? The question was addressed via presenting the Book, Chapter and Verse of the actual content and context of the Holly Scriptures...not opinion.
As far as the word changing in revelation of script. Nothing has changed. If you wish to live by the letter of the OLD LAW (where you are required to live by the letter of the law in order to find righteous salvation in the eyes of the old covenant....GO FOR IT. Live your entire life void of having sinned once under the terms of the LAW....just as the ultimate sacrificial lamb of God did (Jesus the Christ). If you cannot, carry your sins forward year to year until the Real Christ comes to earth incarnate. Make your annual sacrifices (kill a lamb or two) have all you children as well as yourself physically circumcised, avoid eating certain meats. LIVE BY THE ENTIRE LAW or take bits and pieces of it out of context and go to hell because of spiritual adultery. ITS YOUR SOUL, NOT MINE. I shall continue to rightly divide the word of truth. Not depending upon the traditions of men, but the actual revelations of scripture that reads the same for everyone.
Just as Paul pointed out, you are considered a spiritual adulterer if you attempt to live by BOTH LAWS. You cannot have 2 wives no more than you can live under two different covenants. Question? Why do you not present the book, chapter and verse where anyone observed the Sabbath before the command was delivered to Moses on Mt. Sani? Just one verse where anyone under the covenant of Abraham was required to observe Sabbath worship. Come back when you find the scripture.
So you are admitting to having your arse handed to you...
Actually I NEVER use hate sites.. Don't you know the difference?
I have a question for you.. What do you think of the wording "lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil"? Do you think that is correct?
Your query depends upon your position. Do you assume the Holy Scriptures to be BS? The question was addressed via presenting the Book, Chapter and Verse of the actual content and context of the Holly Scriptures...not opinion.
As far as the word changing in revelation of script. Nothing has changed. If you wish to live by the letter of the OLD LAW (where you are required to live by the letter of the law in order to find righteous salvation in the eyes of the old covenant....GO FOR IT. Live your entire life void of having sinned once under the terms of the LAW....just as the ultimate sacrificial lamb of God did (Jesus the Christ). If you cannot, carry your sins forward year to year until the Real Christ comes to earth incarnate. Make your annual sacrifices (kill a lamb or two) have all you children as well as yourself physically circumcised, avoid eating certain meats. LIVE BY THE ENTIRE LAW or take bits and pieces of it out of context and go to hell because of spiritual adultery. ITS YOUR SOUL, NOT MINE. I shall continue to rightly divide the word of truth. Not depending upon the traditions of men, but the actual revelations of scripture that reads the same for everyone.
Just as Paul pointed out, you are considered a spiritual adulterer if you attempt to live by BOTH LAWS. You cannot have 2 wives no more than you can live under two different covenants. Question? Why do you not present the book, chapter and verse where anyone observed the Sabbath before the command was delivered to Moses on Mt. Sani? Just one verse where anyone under the covenant of Abraham was required to observe Sabbath worship. Come back when you find the scripture.
One warning from Paul as far as attempting to live by the letter of the Old Law and the New Covenant. "You have been severed from the Christ, you who are attempting to be justified by THE LAW: YOU HAVE FALLEN FROM GRACE." -- Gal. 5:4
Go, Kudzu.
Apparently Wolverine does not see the illogicality of what he just wrote.
Oh, my...these people actually have to entreat their god not to lead them into temptation.
Jesus did not ask us to pray that God would not tempt us but rather that He would not lead us into temptation. Thus, the implication is not that God Himself might tempt us, but rather that He is the one guiding our lives and that we desire Him to lead us away from evil influences that might tempt us to sin. Indeed, the request to not lead us into temptation is followed by the phrase "but deliver us from evil."
The proposed NEW language for the prayer is "Do NOT ABANDON US to temptation"..
The argument being God never temped anyone to do evil.. Even when Jesus was tempted in the wilderness .. that was Satan, not God.
God doesn't LEAD anyone into sin or evil.. Bad theology and probably bad translation.
Nice evasion.
Either what you said in your earlier post is just a bunch of bullshit...
...OR JESUS LIED when he said he was not here to change any of the law until the Earth passes away.
Don't evade.
Which is it.
Do you think JESUS lied when he said what he said?
If you do not...
...acknowledge that all that bullshit was just bullshit.
Jesus didnot declare......that the Law would not be fulfilled until the earth passes away. Jesus said, the earth would pass away before He failed to complete His mission on earth. "DO NOT THINK THAT I CAME TO DESTORY THE LAW OR THE PROPHETS. I DID NOT COME TO DESTROY (make the earth pass away) BUT TO FULFILL. FOR ASSUEDLY, I SAY TO YOU, TILL HEAVEN AND EARTH PASS AWAY, ONE JOT OR ONE TITTLE WILL BY NO MEANS PASS FROM THE LAW UNTIL ALL IS FULFILLED." -- Matt. 5:17-18.
READ THAT AGAIN!
That shows JESUS saying that NOT ONE WORD OF THE LAW WILL CHANGE UNTIL THE EARTH PASSES AWAY.
Jesus H. Christ...if you have to lie in order to defend what is said in the Bible...where the hell are you?