What is the outcome of the kennedy/trump plan to ban fluoride?

Lets try again. This is a ludicrous statement. Back this up with proof.
You refuse to accept the proof, so there we are.

To give some idea of what banning fluoride might look like, Calgary, Canada, banned fluoride in 2011. In the eight years afterward, the need for intravenous antibiotic therapy for children to avoid death from infection skyrocketed 700 percent at the Alberta Children’s Hospital.

Calgary's plan to reintroduce fluoride into drinking water pushed back to 2025​


The rates stayed the same over that time period in Edmonton, where the water is fluoridated.
 
You refuse to accept the proof, so there we are.





Your video does not play for me if that is your proof.
 
Calgary, Canada banned fluoride in their water, and the need for intravenous antibiotics to avoid death went up by 700%. Make no mistake about it, children will die if we remove fluoride from the drinking water. It might be dozens, it might be hundred, or it might be thousands.

Document this crazy statement!

I gave you the link in the original post. I am giving you the link again for about the fifth time. I have also condensed down the link into a two sentence quote.

To give some idea of what banning fluoride might look like, Calgary, Canada, banned fluoride in 2011. In the eight years afterward, the need for intravenous antibiotic therapy for children to avoid death from infection skyrocketed 700 percent at the Alberta Children’s Hospital.
 
You realize dont you that I haven't asked you to trust me with the lives of thousands of children?????? Are you always this much of a retard?
The policies you propose will effect millions of children's lives, and you base those policies on us trusting you, and your 15 minutes of research.

Maybe your policies are good. Maybe we should move from fluoride in the drinking water to direct fluoride treatments for children. Deciding that would take time. Implementing that would take even more time.

It is idiotic in the extreme to be talking about doing any of this on January 20th, 2025.
 
The policies you propose will effect millions of children's lives, and you base those policies on us trusting you, and your 15 minutes of research.

Maybe your policies are good. Maybe we should move from fluoride in the drinking water to direct fluoride treatments for children. Deciding that would take time. Implementing that would take even more time.

It is idiotic in the extreme to be talking about doing any of this on January 20th, 2025.
What policies specifically have, I, me l yakuda in a random website, proposed? Be very specific. It may be best to copy and paste the policies that I, me, yakuda a random person on a random website, have proposed. I'll wait here.
 
Back
Top