What most likely will be the Destruction of Humankind?

What is the likeliest thing to cause the end of the human race?

  • Global Warming - Earth becomes too hot to support crops

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ozone Layer Depletion - Suns harmful rays kill off all life

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Earthquake/Volcano - Causes earth to fall apart

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ice Age

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Oceans rising buries all land

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Human Destruction of Ariable land

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    15
I'll go with diseases and pollution....The world wont be able to sustain complex lifeforms due to all the crap we are putting in it...

Only thing that will survive will probably be rats and cockroaches...

CK
 
Ahh in 1,000 years we will think 7 fingers and 2 heads are normal for humans.

And will still be saying we were made in Gods image.
 
None of the above.

All of the above may happen. But there will still be a few of us here to start over. The illuminati controllers will suvive, at the very least. That's their plan, anyway.
 
If global warming were to happen it would kill several billion people, but it wouldn't wipe out the human race. I also find it hard to believe that anything but an extremely large asteroid could wipe out the human race to a degree where no one could even survive in shelters.

But nuclear weapons could very easily make the world unlivable for anything that's not an extremophobe for the next thirty years.
 
The asteroid impact is going to happen, its just a matter of time. It may be a millenia or longer, but its going to happen.

Volcanic eruptions could likely make life difficult, but some major eruptions haven't wiped life out. Krakatoa was a pretty big one.

The climate changes probably wouldn't wipe out all life, not even ours.

And there is not enough water on the entire planet to cover all land, even if you melted both poles and turned all water vapor into liquid.
 
Last edited:
The asteroid impact is going to happen, its just a matter of time. It may be a millenia or longer, but its going to happen.

I would be a little bit surprised if it happened with ten millenniums. It's not common at all. The last big one, after all, was more than sixty thousand millenniums ago.
 
And there is not enough water on the entire planet to cover all land, even if you melted both poles and turned all water vapor into liquid.

Oh you may try and weasel round reality with your precious "facts" but i think we all know that if God wants to make it rain enough to flood the planet then he will do just that.

Or have you conveniently forgotten Noah?
 
Oh you may try and weasel round reality with your precious "facts" but i think we all know that if God wants to make it rain enough to flood the planet then he will do just that.

Or have you conveniently forgotten Noah?

No, I have not forgotten the mythology of Noah.

Perhaps you have forgotten that there were other cultures that existed when god supposedly flooded the entire earth, and these other cultures survived without the ark.




WM, impacts by asteroid are not common. But to expect them to be evenly spaced apart in time is an assumption that ignores the way the universe functions.
 
No, I have not forgotten the mythology of Noah.

Perhaps you have forgotten that there were other cultures that existed when god supposedly flooded the entire earth, and these other cultures survived without the ark.

These "other" cultures, whatever they are, were obviously derived from non chosen people who had gone out fishing that day. In other words, they just got lucky or could tread water for a long time.

Naturally most people were poor swimmers back then and drowned with the dinosaurs.
 
These "other" cultures, whatever they are, were obviously derived from non chosen people who had gone out fishing that day. In other words, they just got lucky or could tread water for a long time.

Naturally most people were poor swimmers back then and drowned with the dinosaurs.

LMAO!! Good rationalization.
 
Best response so far is Asshate's. My vote for catesclismic war beats him in seriousness, but lacks the obvious panache and dramatic flair which he delivered.
 
I voted for Asteroid/comet, because that would definitely do the job. Human wars come in as a close second - especially nuclear winter.
 
Back
Top