Yakuda
Verified User
So bidens a climate change denier? That must be hard for you to admit.
What POTUS drilled most oil?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
So bidens a climate change denier? That must be hard for you to admit.
Untrue. You love to jump to conclusions that support your pre-ordained belie structure, that is a mark of stupidity. Its imposable to learn doing that. I guess that is why you are a Trumpper.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
My reasoning is absolutely sound. Biden has greatly reduced new well drilling but the oil and gas industry has greatly increased their efficiency at getting oil and gas out of the ground. So, it isn't thanks to anything the Bribem administration has done that oil and gas production is up. It is up despite Biden's best efforts to kill it off.
The same is true for Barack Obama. Oil production went way up because of the introduction of fracking technology while the number of new wells went down. That is, both Obama and Biden have tried to stop new oil well drilling and pretty much both banned new wells on federal land, but the oil industry with better technology was still able to greatly increase production in existing wells.
https://www.statista.com/statistics...il,in 2022 there will be 22,600 wells drilled.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=44236
So, again, Biden didn't do shit to increase oil and gas production. The oil and gas companies did despite Joke's best efforts to kill production off.
Yakuda
Verified User
Why is he producing more oil then? Oh right for votes. My bad. Stop pretending you cockroaches have any scruples. The only thing to be learned from you cockroaches is how to find the best garbage in a dumpster. Stfu
In your world if a good thing happened while Trump was president... He gets credit.
If a bad thing happened, it was Obama's fault.
If a good thing happens when Biden is president, he gets 0 credit.
If a bad thing happens, its all Biden's fault.
You blamed Biden for inflation over and over again, his policies did not cause it.
More assumptions on your part, your ego must really need a lot of lies to keep you going.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
I gave credit where it was due and blame where it was due. You have a problem with the truth obviously.
You find a way to confirm your bias.
Yakuda
Verified User
It's not an assumption you are praising genocide joe for producing more oil than anyone else even though burning fossil fuels contributes to global warming. So you guys are either climate change deniers or doing it for votes. It's amazing how defensive you get when I make accurate conclusions about your asinine thinking.
Yakuda
Verified User
You can't even confirm your bias here.
I understand perfectly. In our business, we always took the least productive off the street and gave them a desk in the front of the office.
My neighbor who owns a large law firm somewhat followed that rule but instead, they encouraged and sponsored the underperforming partners to run for judge thus giving them a leg up in the courtroom.
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
so you do agree maximizing our domestic production and getting off foreign oil is an inherent good?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
I'm neither of those, Terry. That's your delusional dementia confusing you again.
As for your 14 year old video, I have no doubt Waters and her ilk want to socialize everything. The part your mind is incapable of understanding is that the only way you can force US oil companies to only sell to Americans is by nationalizing them with Trump's National Socialist Party of America.
Your reply says it all.
I disagree with the word "inherent".
I do believe that producing as much oil as reasonably possible in the short run is important, while also working to develop and expand alternative forms of energy productions.
We are energy independent, meaning we produce more than we use, but because we participate in a global market and the oil is sold to the highest bidder internationally we still buy foreign oil. Its about keeping the wealthy, wealthy despite the cost to the Nation.
The problem is very complex, the more the oil companies produce the lower the price, they want high price and high demand, so they manage what they produce. The government is not the limiting factor its the economics for the oil producers that is the limiting factor.
If we solved the dependence on the oil, we would end their juggernaut hold on our economy. This is why there is so much propaganda about alternative energy, very wealthy forces are against it unless they find a way to control it.
It is a very silly issue for a political campaign because its to complex. "Drill... Drill... Drill...." is a great thing for a candidate to say, because the donor oil companies LOVE it, because it gives them less overhead and more power... Many voters love it because they believe somehow that will lower prices.
The true solution is to make oil cheap while developing alternatives. Not easy to do in a capitalist system, and not something a president could accomplish without an outside factor giving her momentum. For the time being its simply a political football.
I supported a family of 5 alone for almost 20 years, I paid to start my wife's business with my income. We have a nice lifestyle and shortly my wife's company will eclipse my income.
What I learned in Law is that most of the "work" is unnecessary bullshit designed to feed ego or impress others. The unnecessary long hours are encouraged by the billable work many lawyers do. I do not do any hourly billable work, I work much less than most lawyers, and I make more than the average lawyer.
ExpressLane
Verified User
Judge Jarod?
ExpressLane
Verified User
Nope not even close
Trump went from 8,800,000 barrels a month to 13,000,000 equal 148%
Biden 11,137,000 barrels a month to 13,236,000 118% If Biden had increased oil growth
at the same rate as Trump did we should be producing 16,482,760 a month by now not 13,260,000 barrels a month. .
Last edited: