What POTUS drilled most oil?

I doubt they know. More importantly, they are too clueless to understand it doesn't matter since, unless the oil companies are nationalized, free market capitalism allows the oil companies to sell to the highest bidder.

What our leaders must prevent is for the US to be strongarmed by OPEC or Russia as happened to us during the Oil embargo. Being oil sufficient is one way, the other is to be oil-free with renewable energy technology.

I don't think that the Magatards care anything about reality, all they want to do is to sound-off what they were programed to say.
 
I don't think that the Magatards care anything about reality, all they want to do is to sound-off what they were programed to say.
Given their advanced aged and demented mindset, I tend to agree. Some just want to fit in with their "friends" and will mouth whatever bullshit allows them to be "one of the guys".

Several on JPP are, IMO, experiencing age related cognitive decline. This is most noticeable in comparing a person's posts from a few years ago and today.
 
I doubt they know. More importantly, they are too clueless to understand it doesn't matter since, unless the oil companies are nationalized, free market capitalism allows the oil companies to sell to the highest bidder.

What our leaders must prevent is for the US to be strongarmed by OPEC or Russia as happened to us during the Oil embargo. Being oil sufficient is one way, the other is to be oil-free with renewable energy technology.

Or a combination of those two things.
 
I disagree with the word "inherent".

I do believe that producing as much oil as reasonably possible in the short run is important, while also working to develop and expand alternative forms of energy productions.

We are energy independent, meaning we produce more than we use, but because we participate in a global market and the oil is sold to the highest bidder internationally we still buy foreign oil. Its about keeping the wealthy, wealthy despite the cost to the Nation.

The problem is very complex, the more the oil companies produce the lower the price, they want high price and high demand, so they manage what they produce. The government is not the limiting factor its the economics for the oil producers that is the limiting factor.

If we solved the dependence on the oil, we would end their juggernaut hold on our economy. This is why there is so much propaganda about alternative energy, very wealthy forces are against it unless they find a way to control it.

It is a very silly issue for a political campaign because its to complex. "Drill... Drill... Drill...." is a great thing for a candidate to say, because the donor oil companies LOVE it, because it gives them less overhead and more power... Many voters love it because they believe somehow that will lower prices.

The true solution is to make oil cheap while developing alternatives. Not easy to do in a capitalist system, and not something a president could accomplish without an outside factor giving her momentum. For the time being its simply a political football.

you;re a fucking idiot.

and you put so much effort into your idiocy.

that's what makes it hilarious.
 
I supported a family of 5 alone for almost 20 years, I paid to start my wife's business with my income. We have a nice lifestyle and shortly my wife's company will eclipse my income.

What I learned in Law is that most of the "work" is unnecessary bullshit designed to feed ego or impress others. The unnecessary long hours are encouraged by the billable work many lawyers do. I do not do any hourly billable work, I work much less than most lawyers, and I make more than the average lawyer.

How much time do you spend in the mirror admiring your own reflection?
 
Nope not even close :laugh:

Trump went from 8,800,000 barrels a month to 13,000,000 equal 148%

Biden 11,137,000 barrels a month to 13,236,000 118% If Biden had increased oil growth
at the same rate as Trump did we should be producing 16,482,760 a month by now not 13,260,000 barrels a month. .

Biden
 
Back
Top