What we suspected about the plandemic all along

[Yakuda]

This was a very good read. We say back then that the govt had no interest in stopping the "pandemic" when they went in the warpath against ivermectin and HCA. Cheap well tested and extremely safe drugs that had been available to humans for decades were trashed by that piece of shit fauci and a complicit evil main stream media. There is a special place in hell for all you evil cockroaches that supported the killing of millions. Leftists are so fucking evil the devil is horrified.

The Wages of COVID — Part One – The American Spectator | USA News and Politics

Author’s note: Last week, Sen. Ron Johnson (R. Wis.), the chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, released a majority staff interim report titled “Failure to Warn: How Federal Health Agencies Downplayed the Risk of Myocarditis and Other Adverse Events Following COVID-19...

spectator.org

 

[Yakuda]

It's funny how the leftist maggots always complain about the profits magd by "evil" corporations but I don't remember one of them whining about how much money the death stab made for big pharma.

 

[ZenMode]

This was a very good read. We say back then that the govt had no interest in stopping the "pandemic" when they went in the warpath against ivermectin and HCA. Cheap well tested and extremely safe drugs that had been available to humans for decades were trashed by that piece of shit fauci and a complicit evil main stream media. There is a special place in hell for all you evil cockroaches that supported the killing of millions. Leftists are so fucking evil the devil is horrified.

The Wages of COVID — Part One – The American Spectator | USA News and Politics

Author’s note: Last week, Sen. Ron Johnson (R. Wis.), the chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, released a majority staff interim report titled “Failure to Warn: How Federal Health Agencies Downplayed the Risk of Myocarditis and Other Adverse Events Following COVID-19...

spectator.org

The war wasn't against Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquin, it was against encouraging untested drugs that has shown no effectiveness.

 

[Yakuda]

The war wasn't against Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquin, it was against encouraging untested drugs that has shown no effectiveness.

Fucking horseshit. HCQ was developed in 1955 and ivermectin in 1975 and approved for use in humans in 1987. Ivermectin and hcq are on the world health organizations list of essentially medicines. You're so fucking retarded it's amazing you can type

 

[ZenMode]

Fucking horseshit. HCQ was developed in 1955 and ivermectin in 1975 and approved for use in humans in 1987.
Ivermectin and hcq are on the world health organizations list of essentially medicines. You're so fucking retarded it's amazing you can type

"Approved for use in humans" isn't the same thing as "effective when treating Covid". The CDC never said Ivermectin and HCQ couldn't be prescribed to treat things that Ivermectin and HCQ were known to be effective in treating. Ivermectin, HCQ and every other trial-tested and confirmed medication on the market, continued to be prescribed alllll throughout the pandemic.

They (CDC) said Ivermectin and HCQ weren't shown to be effective in treating Covid and maybe the conspiracy theorists fools should stop self-medicating with feed store Ivermectin before you kill yourself.

 

[gfm7175]

It's funny how the leftist maggots always complain about the profits magd by "evil" corporations but I don't remember one of them whining about how much money the death stab made for big pharma.

They even try to deny it.

"Big pharma" makes no money off of most of the vaccines."
[WALT]

 

[Yakuda]

"Approved for use in humans" isn't the same thing as "effective when treating Covid". The CDC never said Ivermectin and HCQ couldn't be prescribed to treat things that Ivermectin and HCQ were known to be effective in treating. Ivermectin, HCQ and every other trial-tested and confirmed medication on the market, continued to be prescribed alllll throughout the pandemic.

They (CDC) said Ivermectin and HCQ weren't shown to be effective in treating Covid and maybe the conspiracy theorists fools should stop self-medicating with feed store Ivermectin before you kill yourself.

Oh course it was proven effective all around the world. The only place it wasnt for me effective was here. What.a fucking surprise. The home of big pharma. Even if it wasnt effective why would the govt give a shit if you used it? You're so deluded it's not funny

 

[gfm7175]

"Approved for use in humans" isn't the same thing as "effective when treating Covid". The CDC never said Ivermectin and HCQ couldn't be prescribed to treat things that Ivermectin and HCQ were known to be effective in treating. Ivermectin, HCQ and every other trial-tested and confirmed medication on the market, continued to be prescribed alllll throughout the pandemic.

They said that you couldn't even give it the good ol' college try with regard to COVID because "you are not a horse, you are not a cow". They had other poisons to push instead.

They (CDC) said Ivermectin and HCQ weren't shown to be effective in treating Covid

They lied. Surprised?? I'm not.

and maybe the conspiracy theorists fools should stop self-medicating with feed store Ivermectin before you kill yourself.

Ivermectin is quite safe/effective, whether it comes from a feed store or elsewhere (so long as it is from a reputable producer/distributor). One just has to know how to properly dose it.

 

[ZenMode]

Oh course it was proven effective all around the world.

No it wasn't.

The only place it wasnt for me effective was here. What.a fucking surprise. The home of big pharma. Even if it wasnt effective why would the govt give a shit if you used it? You're so deluded it's not funny

There were anecdotal examples of them being effective, but Uncle Tony saying Ivermectin cured his Covid isn't "proof". It's also not the basis for the CDC recommending them being used to treat or prevent Covid. That's not how medicine works.

 

[ZenMode]

They said that you couldn't even give it the good ol' college try with regard to COVID because "you are not a horse, you are not a cow". They had other poisons to push instead.

Many doctors are unlikely to prescribe medications to treat something for which it has never been tested.

They lied. Surprised?? I'm not.

They didn't like I said above, Uncle Tony saying Ivermectin cured his Covid isn't "proof".

Ivermectin is quite safe/effective, whether it comes from a feed store or elsewhere (so long as it is from a reputable producer/distributor). One just has to know how to properly dose it.

Yes, but most doctors aren't going to prescribe untested medications based on hope that it works.

 

[gfm7175]

Many doctors are unlikely to prescribe medications to treat something for which it has never been tested.

Bull spit. That's precisely what they were doing with the COVID jabs themselves, as well as with "run death is near" and Paxlovid.

They didn't like I said above, Uncle Tony saying Ivermectin cured his Covid isn't "proof".

Yes, dude, they lied.

Yes, but most doctors aren't going to prescribe untested medications based on hope that it works.

Ivermectin has been thoroughly tested, unlike "run death is near" and Paxlovid (and the jabs themselves).

 

[ZenMode]

Bull spit. That's precisely what they were doing with the COVID jabs themselves, as well as with "run death is near" and Paxlovid.

Nope. There were trials done for the vaccines and paxlovid related to their covid effectiveness.

Trial Design | PAXLOVID™ (nirmatrelvir tablets; ritonavir tablets)

Find information about the EPIC-HR pivotal trial, including trial design and participant demographics. Get safety information including risks & benefits.

paxlovid.pfizerpro.com

Drug Trials Snapshots: PAXLOVID

Drug Trials Snapshots: PAXLOVID

www.fda.gov

Yes, dude, they lied.

Who lied?

Ivermectin has been thoroughly tested, unlike "run death is near" and Paxlovid (and the jabs themselves).

Unlike Paxlovid, Ivermectin wasn't tested for effectiveness against Covid. Of course, there are any number of drugs that could be effective against Covid. Hell, for all we know, Viagara might be effective against Covid, but the CDC isnt' going to recommend it, and ethical doctors are unlikely to prescribe it, based on anecdotal evidence from Uncle Jim.

 

[Matt Dillon]

Nope. There were trials done for the vaccines and paxlovid related to their covid effectiveness.

Trial Design | PAXLOVID™ (nirmatrelvir tablets; ritonavir tablets)

Find information about the EPIC-HR pivotal trial, including trial design and participant demographics. Get safety information including risks & benefits.

paxlovid.pfizerpro.com

Drug Trials Snapshots: PAXLOVID

Drug Trials Snapshots: PAXLOVID

www.fda.gov

Who lied?

Unlike Paxlovid, Ivermectin wasn't tested for effectiveness against Covid. Of course, there are any number of drugs that could be effective against Covid. Hell, for all we know, Viagara might be effective against Covid, but the CDC isnt' going to recommend it, and ethical doctors are unlikely to prescribe it, based on anecdotal evidence from Uncle Jim.

You're an agitprop shill. Fuck off and die. TIA!
Now do Ivermectin.
They murdered thousands of mostly old people, and others are fucked for life from all this garbage.
In b4 the Morgan & Morgan ads.

....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
..........''...\.......... _.·´
............\..............(
..............\.............\...

 

[gfm7175]

Nope. There were trials done for the vaccines and paxlovid related to their covid effectiveness.

Who lied?

RQAA.

Unlike Paxlovid,

It really wasn't tested.

Ivermectin wasn't tested for effectiveness against Covid.

If not, then why not?

Of course, there are any number of drugs that could be effective against Covid.

Okay, so see above.

Hell, for all we know, Viagara might be effective against Covid,

Okay, so see above.

but the CDC isnt' going to recommend it,

Why not?

and ethical doctors are unlikely to prescribe it,

Why not?

based on anecdotal evidence from Uncle Jim.

If it seems to have worked for Uncle Jim, then why not look into it further and see if there's actually anything legit about it or not?

 

[Yakuda]

No it wasn't.

There were anecdotal examples of them being effective, but Uncle Tony saying Ivermectin cured his Covid isn't "proof". It's also not the basis for the CDC recommending them being used to treat or prevent Covid. That's not how medicine works.

The US was sending ivermection to Brazil you dunce. I'll ask you again , why should the govt give a shit that people wanted to try ivermectin? You asshole called it horse dewormer know damn well it's was approved for use in humans decades ago. You people are pieces of shit.

 

[Yakuda]

Many doctors are unlikely to prescribe medications to treat something for which it has never been tested.

They didn't like I said above, Uncle Tony saying Ivermectin cured his Covid isn't "proof".

Yes, but most doctors aren't going to prescribe untested medications based on hope that it works.

Why should the govt stop it? Both ivermectin and HCQ were safe and approved for use in humans. Drugs are used for off lable purposes all the time. Why do you assholes think everyone is as stupid as you?

 

[ZenMode]

Trials were done. If you have no evidence to the contrary, then you're conspiracy theorizing.

RQAA.

Nope. You said "they". They isn't a person. "They" is a terminology used by conspiracy theorists.

It really wasn't tested.

Again, what evidence do you have?

If not, then why not?

Why would there be testing? Again, there are millions of drugs on the market. Why pick that one to test? Is it because Uncle Benny says it helped his mommy?

Okay, so see above.

Done. You think it's a good use of time testing arbitrary drugs?

Okay, so see above.

Done. You think it's a good use of time testing arbitrary drugs?

Why not?

Because it hasn't been shown to work. I'm baffled by your continued confusion on this point.

Why not?

Liability, wasting time and money.

If it seems to have worked for Uncle Jim, then why not look into it further and see if there's actually anything legit about it or not?

You're joking, right?

 

[ZenMode]

The US was sending ivermection to Brazil you dunce.

Link?

I'll ask you again , why should the govt give a shit that people wanted to try ivermectin?

Because people were killing themselves by self medicating and there was no evidence that it worked. The CDC makes recommendations based on available information, not anecdotes.

You asshole called it horse dewormer know damn well it's was approved for use in humans decades ago. You people are pieces of shit.

Which asshole called it horse dewormer? I never called it horse dewormer. I mocked the fools going to the feed store and risking death but, hey, natural selection....

 

[ZenMode]

Why should the govt stop it?

When did the government stop it?

Both ivermectin and HCQ were safe and approved for use in humans.

Not to treat Covid. A doctor could prescribe it, and I'm sure some did, but an ethical doctor isn't going to make medical decisions based on stories from Uncle Bob, are they? That seems just a tad irresponsible.

Drugs are used for off lable purposes all the time. Why do you assholes think everyone is as stupid as you?

Again, the CDC makes recommendations. Doctors have the final say on what prescriptions they write. The medical boards of each state regulate doctors, not the federal government.

These are things you'd probably know if you didn't get your "news" from Gateway Pundit.

 

[gfm7175]

Trials were done.

Not really.

If you have no evidence to the contrary, then you're conspiracy theorizing.

Trials were done. If you have no evidence to the contrary, then you're conspiracy theorizing.

See above.

Nope. You said "they". They isn't a person. "They" is a terminology used by conspiracy theorists.

"They" was already identified (by YOU, no less). You're telling me that you can't keep up with what YOU have said?? YOU first made reference to a group of people and then I subsequently referred to them as "they". Back track and figure it out.

Again, what evidence do you have?

Attempt to shift the burden of proof.

Why would there be testing?

Because, as you said, "Hell, for all we know, Viagara might be effective against Covid". If there's some doctors out there who have tried using ivermectin as a treatment, resulting in anecdotal claims that ivermectin is working as a treatment, then why wouldn't you investigate it and test it further?

Again, there are millions of drugs on the market. Why pick that one to test?

Because that's the one that "Uncle Jim" was using and it was supposedly working. That's why you pick that one to test; because there's reason to believe that it might be an effective treatment option.

Is it because Uncle Benny says it helped his mommy?

Yes... along with Uncle Jim, Aunt Jemima, Billy Joe Bob, Susan, and many other people who are claiming that it helped them.

Done. You think it's a good use of time testing arbitrary drugs?

Done. You think it's a good use of time testing arbitrary drugs?

You mean like Paxlovid and "run death is near"?? Why not test something that's proven to be safe and been around for a very long time and is being claimed to be an effective treatment? Oh, that's right, there's no money in THAT...

Because it hasn't been shown to work. I'm baffled by your continued confusion on this point.

So don't test it because it hasn't been shown to work via testing?? Do you even hear yourself?

Liability, wasting time and money.

You mean like Paxlovid and "run death is near"??

You're joking, right?

Not at all. It only makes sense to look into a treatment option that seems to be working rather well for other people.