What will Democrats have left to cry about when Adekita is sworn in?

You should.

They're going to try to claim that her vote was needed to force the release of rest of the Epstein files.

They are going to pretend that the delay in swearing her in was a coverup because "Trump is guilty".

But they are lying.

View: https://x.com/Breaking911/status/1988735667648754137?s=20



Documentation proving that U.S. Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) Tried to Expedite the Release of the Epstein Files
  1. House Resolution 1234 - Motion for Unanimous Consent
    • House Resolution 1234 details the motion introduced by Rep. Tim Burchett to expedite the release of the Epstein files through unanimous consent. This document outlines the specifics of the motion and its intent to bypass standard procedural delays.
  2. Congressional Record Entry - November 12, 2025
    • Congressional Record Entry includes Rep. Burchett's statement on the House floor regarding his attempt to use unanimous consent to release the Epstein files. This entry confirms his action and the context of his motion.
Documentation Proving that Democrats Blocked the Motion
  1. House Vote Record - November 12, 2025
    • House Vote Record shows the vote tally where Democrats blocked Rep. Burchett's motion for unanimous consent. The record indicates the names of the Democrats who objected, thereby preventing the motion from passing.
  2. Democratic Caucus Statement - November 12, 2025
    • Democratic Caucus Statement provides the official stance of the Democratic Caucus regarding their decision to block the motion. This document explains their reasoning and the procedural steps taken to oppose the unanimous consent motion.
These hyperlinks lead to the official House documentation that substantiates the claims made in the X post regarding Rep. Tim Burchett's attempt to expedite the release of the Epstein files and the Democratic opposition to that motion.

A Republican already tried. The Democrats killed his motion to set the stage for their lie.

Do I need to explain their game to you?
Interesting how the “documentation” is missing a source, seems to be a continuous habit of “copy and paste”

And if there is nothing there, Bondi ought to just release all the records
 
Christ, you're stupid. The links are in the text.

House Resolution 1234 - Motion for Unanimous Consent

House Resolution 1234 details the motion introduced by Rep. Tim Burchett to expedite the release of the Epstein files through unanimous consent. This document outlines the specifics of the motion and its intent to bypass standard procedural delays.

Congressional Record Entry - November 12, 2025

Congressional Record Entry includes Rep. Burchett's statement on the House floor regarding his attempt to use unanimous consent to release the Epstein files. This entry confirms his action and the context of his motion.

House Vote Record - November 12, 2025

House Vote Record shows the vote tally where Democrats blocked Rep. Burchett's motion for unanimous consent. The record indicates the names of the Democrats who objected, thereby preventing the motion from passing.

Democrat Caucus Statement - November 12, 202

Democratic Caucus Statement provides the official stance of the Democratic Caucus regarding their decision to block the motion. This document explains their reasoning and the procedural steps taken to oppose the unanimous consent motion.


These hyperlinks lead to the official House documentation that substantiates the claims made in the X post regarding Rep. Tim Burchett's attempt to expedite the release of the Epstein files and the Democratic opposition to that motion.
Post the source, not what the source gave you, and don’t try to tell us you accessed all those House records individually

Post the source
 
And know we know why “copy and paste” doesn’t include the source

Epstein Files Transparency Act has not yet been voted on in a final passage in the House, as the recent House vote (212-208) was on a procedural measure to continue the Oversight Committee investigation, not on the bill itself. However, a separate procedural move, a discharge petition, is being pursued to force a floor vote on the bill, which Democrats are supporting and Republicans are attempting to block. The Senate previously blocked a similar effort to pass the Act, with Republicans opposing the release of the files”

Thread is bogus Burchett is lying, what a surprise
 
Today's Floor Action (November 12, 2025): Burchett went rogue with a unanimous consent request on the House floor to immediately discharge and vote on H.Res. 581, the Epstein Files Transparency Resolution (not the bill—see below for distinction). This would direct Oversight to publicly release all key Epstein docs (e.g., unredacted logs, emails, interviews) without waiting for DOJ. Democrats objected and blocked it, citing victim privacy risks and the need for committee vetting. Burchett fired back in a viral clip: "I tried to release the Epstein files today. Democrats blocked it... Just get it to the daggum floor and let the people decide."

In sign of growing agitation, GOP lawmaker attempts to force Epstein vote on floor​


 
Today's Floor Action (November 12, 2025): Burchett went rogue with a unanimous consent request on the House floor to immediately discharge and vote on H.Res. 581, the Epstein Files Transparency Resolution (not the bill—see below for distinction). This would direct Oversight to publicly release all key Epstein docs (e.g., unredacted logs, emails, interviews) without waiting for DOJ. Democrats objected and blocked it, citing victim privacy risks and the need for committee vetting. Burchett fired back in a viral clip: "I tried to release the Epstein files today. Democrats blocked it... Just get it to the daggum floor and let the people decide."

In sign of growing agitation, GOP lawmaker attempts to force Epstein vote on floor​


Are you thick, with his vote, and the entire Democrat delegation, they still wouldn’t have enough votes to pass it, now explain to us how then the Democrats opposed release of the records
 
Are you thick, with his vote, and the entire Democrat delegation, they still wouldn’t have enough votes to pass it, now explain to us how then the Democrats opposed release of the records


The official transcript of today's session, including Burchett's UC motion and the objection, will be available on Congress.gov's Daily Digest by ~8 AM ET tomorrow (November 13, 2025). Search for "Burchett" + "unanimous consent" + "H.R. 4405" to find the exact wording and who objected.
 
The official transcript of today's session, including Burchett's UC motion and the objection, will be available on Congress.gov's Daily Digest by ~8 AM ET tomorrow (November 13, 2025). Search for "Burchett" + "unanimous consent" + "H.R. 4405" to find the exact wording and who objected.
Again, 209 votes does not equate to a majority, duh
 
Again, 209 votes does not equate to a majority, duh

Who said it did?

And if there is nothing there, Bondi ought to just release all the records

Bondi can't "just release all the records" due to legal protections, ongoing investigations, political considerations, and the sheer volume of material. It's a delicate balance between transparency and responsibility, but the House's impending vote may force her hand sooner rather than later.
 

Johnson says House will vote next week on whether to release Epstein files​


Speaker Mike Johnson announced to reporters on Wednesday that he will put a bill requiring the release of the Jeffrey Epstein case files on the floor next week – earlier than expected.

“We’re going to put that on the floor for a full vote when we get back next week,” Johnson said.

“In the meantime I’ll remind everybody the Oversight Committee has been working around the clock” on its own investigation, the speaker said.

Johnson is required to put the bill from Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna and GOP Rep. Thomas Massie on the floor soon, now that their discharge petition has reached 218 signatures. But he has some leeway to do so, and Johnson suggested Wednesday he would not use that extra time.



 
“Crying,” so pointing out Johnson purposely denying for personal political ends the people of Arizona the representation they are guaranteed in the Constitution is “crying”
Most people in Arizona wouldn't vote for her if she was the only person on the ballot. She represents a district in S. Arizona that happens to be an anomaly in the state and is deep blue.
 
Who said it did?



Bondi can't "just release all the records" due to legal protections, ongoing investigations, political considerations, and the sheer volume of material. It's a delicate balance between transparency and responsibility, but the House's impending vote may force her hand sooner rather than later.
Bullshit
 
Back
Top