What's an optimal level of government spending?

Exactly, and white people were fine with it because those 'lazy black welfare queens' weren't getting any of 'their' money. Now, they aren't at all happy with the idea of taxing the rich to distribute wealth appropriately.

Imagine when we unleash ALL our talented Americans to add to the pot


Oh my goddess what an unstoppable train we will be

We got the tools


And we got the talent


Full speed ahead
 
You don't know what I want, you fucking commie liar. You never even asked.

However, I told ya right here:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-of-government-spending&p=5098080#post5098080

Yes you did say what you wanted. To be able to pay your mortgage with three days pay. That was because we taxed the wealthy. Obviously you are a massive hypocrite, and when I called you on it, you got angry and started name calling. You are a lightweight. Actually, that's an insult to lightweights. I've never seen anyone so utterly ignorant.
 
Imagine when we unleash ALL our talented Americans to add to the pot


Oh my goddess what an unstoppable train we will be

We got the tools


And we got the talent


Full speed ahead

yes. all the disciples of pedophilia will turn our children into prostitutes.

go go go.
 
Then you want what FDR gave us fool


Not what the trust fund baby trump tells you you should want


Idiot

"22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire."

Matthew 5:22 baby girl.

I do admire a Roosevelt, but it's not Franklin Delano, it's Teddy. ;)

He walked the streets of my hood, even.
 
Last edited:
Yes you did say what you wanted. To be able to pay your mortgage with three days pay. That was because we taxed the wealthy. Obviously you are a massive hypocrite, and when I called you on it, you got angry and started name calling. You are a lightweight. Actually, that's an insult to lightweights. I've never seen anyone so utterly ignorant.

Allow me to help you out with that, guy. :)

thumb_234582_default_big.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Very likely a Russian bot hole and not a real human

A Russian bot is smarter than Sheriff Woody. So I'd say he's an actual dude. Old, white, alone, incredibly stupid. Probably eats TV dinners and watches whatever he can get with his rabbit ear antenna.
 
That's a taxing question, not a spending question. If the ROI is lower than the cost of borrowing the money, it is good.

Perhaps, but that doesn't erase the opportunity cost issue. We could, for example, as easily borrow money to finance tax cuts that would mean more private spending, which might have higher or lower ROI.
 
A Russian bot is smarter than Sheriff Woody. So I'd say he's an actual dude. Old, white, alone, incredibly stupid. Probably eats TV dinners and watches whatever he can get with his rabbit ear antenna.

How's your portfolio doing with this Biden guy? You're down how much, again? :whoa:

I got my numbers and a friend's numbers. What's your numbers, hmm? :D
 
Perhaps, but that doesn't erase the opportunity cost issue. We could, for example, as easily borrow money to finance tax cuts that would mean more private spending, which might have higher or lower ROI.

The two exist independently. A tax cut with a positive ROI is just as good as spending with a positive ROI but they are completely different. And only one requires borrowing money to finance it. That's the spending program.
 
A Russian bot is smarter than Sheriff Woody. So I'd say he's an actual dude. Old, white, alone, incredibly stupid. Probably eats TV dinners and watches whatever he can get with his rabbit ear antenna.

His programmer wishes he could get TV dinners


The government store shelves are nearly empty now
 
Back
Top