DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
I wasn't aware that was a requirement. Is it?He served in the military?
I wasn't aware that was a requirement. Is it?He served in the military?
He served in the military?
common law does not supercede the constitution.
moron
why would anyone do populatity ratings on some not holding or running for an office?
I wasn't aware that was a requirement. Is it?
It certainly isn't normal, but seeing the Liberal whining, thumb-sucking crybabies getting their nappies in a twist over it is...
Well it is if you weasel out of it.
Or were you guys wrong about Clowntoon?
I guess it shows that the repubs are still searching for a leader to follow.
Is Rush still #3?
so common law does not define or interpret terms in the constitution? it may not supersede it (and its with an S not a C you keep using C) but your argument is all wrong....you don't understand how federal common law works....scotus makes federal common law as well....if you read the treaty....the US signed an exemption or something like that that allows cases of torture to be defined by the 8th amendment....and guess who gets to define that......scotus....eg., common law
then you must believe that obama is not a great american or a hero....
Answer the question. Is it or isn't it a requirement?
Actually it shows, once again, when confronted with the incessant whining and hand-wringing you libs are defining yourself by, you still end up with pablum running down your chin.
Sooner or later even you should be embarassed that you couldn't get your own dog to follow you to the kibble bowl, oh great wise leader in retirement.
Requirement no. But for someone to say that clowntoon was not qualified to be president because he weasled out of the draft and the say that another politician that weaseled out of the draft is a great American hero is hypocritical at worst. Partisan hackmanship at best.
yoiu seem to know a lot about the law... Are you saying that the UN Convention against torture is NOT the supreme law of the land? Are you saying that we are NOT bound to follow it?
i read some lawstuff off of google...not an expert...but judge judy taught me everything i know
and i never said what you're asking....i suggest you go back and read what i've said.....because i've actually said it is the supreme law of the land, however, common law can be applied to interpret torture as the scotus can interpret the constitution and treaties.....that is what the judicial branch is for
It is good to see you admit that you are not a legal expert. I am sure you are quite proud of that admission.... however...based upon what you learned from Judge Judy, and from what you know of the senate limitations to the UN treaty, would you say that we have violated that treaty by our treatment of enemy combatants at Gitmo?
American law is that international accords become part of the body of U.S. federal law.As a result, Congress can modify or repeal treaties by subsequent legislative action, even if this amounts to a violation of the treaty under international law. This was held, for instance, in the Head Money Cases. The most recent changes will be enforced by U.S. courts entirely independent of whether the international community still considers the old treaty obligations binding upon the U.S.that's just silly.....if the UN treaty were the supreme law of the land, the constitution would be looking to the treaty for authority, rather than the other way around.....
now if you just want to say the constitution makes the treaty valid law, (which I still would disagree with), your statement at least wouldn't be nonsense....
Just out of curosity for those who think Dicky Cheney is a great American hero. Please state how you think he earned that status?
Being VP? I am sure you do not think of Al Goretex as a great American hero.
So what do you base that statement on?
do you think obama is?