What's wrong with DEMOCRATS?

They're pervs.

They honestly don't think touching little kids is perverted.

s2QXbDa.gif


c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800.gif
 
DEMOCRAT Media Go Wild for Child-Porn Friendly Judge

FOohyqlXoAIx99w.jpg:large



These were Google’s top headlines about the hearings on groomer Biden’s Supreme Court nominee, Affirmative Action Jackson:

White Louse chief of staff KK Klain hits back at Sen. Ted Cruz — Business Insider, April 4, 2022

Cory Booker demolishes GOP attempts to smear Affirmative Action Jackson — Washington Post, April 5, 2022

Lindsey Graham Throws An Impotent S–T Fit Over Affirmative Action Jackson’s Supreme Court Nomination — Vanity Fair, April 4, 2022

The media seem to believe their coup de grace against Republicans who have the audacity to vote against Affirmative Action Jackson is that three — THREE! — RINOs voted in favor of her nomination to the D.C. court of appeals just last year!

Nuff said.

Although, now that I think about it, four years ago, as it became clear that Brett Kavanaugh’s feminist accusers were lying psychopaths, the entire leftist establishment instructed us: THE SUPREME COURT IS DIFFERENT FROM AN APPELLATE COURT!

To wit:

Ari Melber: “Today’s debate is not about removing Kavanaugh from his powerful perch on the D.C. circuit, [but] … a big decision to promote him to a big job for life.” — “The Beat With Ari Melber,” Sept. 17, 2018

Rachel Maddow: “Obviously, this is not a criminal investigation. … This is about figuring out if somebody is suitable for a big job promotion, basically.” — “The Rachel Maddow Show,” Oct. 2, 2018

Joy Ann Reid: “So, the thing about the Supreme Court is that once you make it there, you are there for life, unless you choose to retire or you pass away.” — “The Rachel Maddow Show,” Sept. 28, 2018

Sen. Richard Blumenthal: “We’re dealing with a United States Supreme Court nomination, an appointment for life to the highest court in the land that makes a real difference in people’s lives in the real world.” — “The Beat With Ari Melber,” Sept. 17, 2018

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand: “This is about do you deserve the promotion? Do you deserve this job opportunity to be a Supreme Court justice, to a lifetime appointment, to make fundamental decisions about women’s rights for perhaps decades to come?” — “All In With Chris Hayes,” Sept. 25, 2018

So cut the crap, lefties, about how Lindsey Graham “voted to confirm her in the past, like literally within the past year” (Reid), and therefore is “humiliat[ing] himself” by “only now object[ing] to” Affirmative Action Jackson (Lawrence O’Donnell), staging a “reversal” (failing New York Times) and “magnificently fail[ing]” at “consistency and Supreme Court nominations” (Reid).

You want consistency?

Read your own statements from a few years ago on the GIGANTIC difference in confirming someone to an appeals court and making a “big decision to promote him to a big job for life.”





https://www.takimag.com/article/media-go-wild-for-child-porn-friendly-judge/
 
What state is that? There are only six that have set the age at 18 and removed all exceptions. I certainly support this though. 18 and no exceptions. Parents should not have the right to "give permission" to get their 12 year old daughter all hitched up. Nobody is ready to make life decisions at that age and nobody should make it "in their behalf", that's child abuse.

Oddly Massachusetts has the lowest minimum marriage age with parental consent of 14 years old for boys and 12 years old for girls, sure doesn't sound like a republican stronghold to me.

That's Different.
 
Their thinking is all wrong and they have an inability to progress.

Why is keeping men and boys out of women's sports, bathrooms and locker rooms "an inability to progress"? Why should men be allowed to compete against women in women's sports?
 
I suspect that very few of them do, and they will be browbeaten into silence.

It's becoming obvious which posters here would allow men/boys in women's bathrooms, locker rooms and sports. Sad. Very sad...
 
They think they're being "progressive".

I think they're fucking human trash. Men will always be men. Women will always be women.

The first thing that is checked (not counting imaging) by the Dr, nurse or mother is the sex of a newborn child.
 
I think they're fucking human trash. Men will always be men. Women will always be women. The first thing that is checked (not counting imaging) by the Dr, nurse or mother is the sex of a newborn child.

The left seems determined to change that, don't they?

I think I know why.
 
I have no idea why they'd want men in women's sports.

DEMOCRATS (and all leftists) seek the destruction of all traditional roles for reasons that I suspect many of them are unlikely to understand.

They only know it's what the group thinks and they are anxious to conform because they are desperate to feel validation of their own negative feelings of existential guilt, IMO.

The end result is the self-imposed extinction of the human race.
 
DEMOCRATS (and all leftists) seek the destruction of all traditional roles for reasons that I suspect many of them are unlikely to understand.

They only know it's what the group thinks and they are anxious to conform because they are desperate to feel validation of their own negative feelings of existential guilt, IMO.

The end result is the self-imposed extinction of the human race.

I believe their goal is the extinction of the U.S. of A.
 
Back
Top