When Is Ted Cruz Going To Be Banned From FB and Twitter?

[AProudLefty]

I said that they target conservatives.

I never claimed that they have successfully removed all conservatives (and I doubt that they would even wish to remove all conservatives to begin with, for optics reasons).

Correct. So they don't target conservatives.

Political affiliations don't matter. Misinformation is misinformation.

 

[gfm7175]

Correct. So they don't target conservatives.

They target conservatives.

Political affiliations don't matter.

To Big Tech they do.

Misinformation is misinformation.

An undefined buzzword is an undefined buzzword.

 

[AProudLefty]

They target conservatives.

I provided an example with Ted Cruz. It disproves your claim.

To Big Tech they do.

No proof of such thing.

An undefined buzzword is an undefined buzzword.

In other words: "I cannot judge what is true or what is false".

 

[Trumpet]

Inquiring minds want to know. The claim is that Farcebook and Twiter target conservatives. So why are there so many conservatives on FB and Twitter still?

Ted Cruz says crazy things and yet he hasn't been banned.

https://twitter.com/tedcruz

Here's an example.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1417516397756813312

Conservatives are big whiners when they don't get their way.

 

[Bulletbob]

Democrats want all republicans banned ots called censorship and power hungry. they think its ok . Its what helped the nazis gain control and what all commies do

 

[gfm7175]

I provided an example with Ted Cruz. It disproves your claim.

WRONG. That would disprove a claim such as "all conservatives have been removed", but that is not my claim.

I've only claimed that conservatives are being targeted. That is evidenced by the very high number of conservatives who have been temporarily or permanently banned and by the fact that nowhere near as many liberals are getting temporary or permanent bans. It is plain as day who is being targeted.

 

[AProudLefty]

WRONG. That would disprove a claim such as "all conservatives have been removed", but that is not my claim.

You claimed that conservatives are being targeted.

I've only claimed that conservatives are being targeted. That is evidenced by the very high number of conservatives who have been temporarily or permanently banned and by the fact that nowhere near as many liberals are getting temporary or permanent bans. It is plain as day who is being targeted.

There is no such evidence.

 

[gfm7175]

You claimed that conservatives are being targeted.

Indeed I did.

There is no such evidence.

Are you now denying all of the conservatives who have been temp banned and/or perma banned...??

 

[AProudLefty]

Indeed I did.

Of which you are proven wrong.

Are you now denying all of the conservatives who have been temp banned and/or perma banned...??

Are you denying that liberals and conservatives are getting banned due to ToS violations?

 

[gfm7175]

Of which you are proven wrong.

Nope, as I have already explained.

Are you denying that liberals and conservatives are getting banned due to ToS violations?

Nope, I'm not. Both liberals and conservatives have been banned due to ToS violations.

However, those bans have "disproportionately affected the conservative community". Sound familiar?

 

[AProudLefty]

Nope, as I have already explained.

Examples of conservatives, one being Ted Cruz, still having their FB and Twitter accounts intact prove your claim wrong. Why cannot you understand that?

However, those bans have "disproportionately affected the conservative community". Sound familiar?

Do you have any evidence of that?

BTW, correlation does not imply causation.

 

[gfm7175]

Examples of conservatives, one being Ted Cruz, still having their FB and Twitter accounts intact prove your claim wrong. Why cannot you understand that?

I never claimed that all conservatives have been removed from FB and Twitter. Why cannot you understand that?

Do you have any evidence of that?

BTW, correlation does not imply causation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_suspensions#List_of_notable_suspensions

Take a look at the plethora of conservatives on this list and the lack of liberals on this list...

Twitter bans are disproportionately affecting the conservative community.

 

[AProudLefty]

I never claimed that all conservatives have been removed from FB and Twitter. Why cannot you understand that?

Again, I did not say you claimed that. Do you have a memory problem?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_suspensions#List_of_notable_suspensions

Seriously? You want to use those users as examples?

BTW, Jack Dorsey was suspended. The irony.

Twitter bans are disproportionately affecting the conservative community.

Still no evidence.

You violate ToS, you get suspended or banned. Simple. Why is it hard for you to understand?

 

[gfm7175]

Again, I did not say you claimed that. Do you have a memory problem?

Again, you keep acting as if the "Ted Cruz" conflicting evidence somehow applies to MY claim rather than THIS other claim.
Do you have a logic problem?

Seriously? You want to use those users as examples?

Yes. They make fine examples to my point.

BTW, Jack Dorsey was suspended. The irony.

So?

Still no evidence.

You are seriously going to deny what I just presented you with? Bury your head deep into the sand? Cover your eyes like the "see no evil" monkey??

You violate ToS, you get suspended or banned. Simple. Why is it hard for you to understand?

It's not... what's hard to understand is what the ToS actually are, as they include numerous meaningless buzzwords in them. Why is this so hard for you to understand?

Here, I'll try to make it simpler for you... From now on, within this thread, any response of yours in which you bizzlewizzle will be summarily dismissed, as bizzlewizzling is against my ToS.

 

[AProudLefty]

Again, you keep acting as if the "Ted Cruz" conflicting evidence somehow applies to MY claim rather than THIS other claim.
Do you have a logic problem?

You claimed that FB and Twitter are targeting conservatives. I gave you Ted Cruz as an example. His accounts are still intact. Hannity and Carlson still have theirs. Do you want me to give you more examples to show that you're wrong?

Yes. They make fine examples to my point.

Most aren't even conservatives. They're far right.

So?

So your claim that there are no liberals on the list is destroyed.

You are seriously going to deny what I just presented you with? Bury your head deep into the sand? Cover your eyes like the "see no evil" monkey??

You have given me evidence that mostly far right and hate users being suspended or banned. I don't see very many true conservatives on the list.

It's not... what's hard to understand is what the ToS actually are, as they include numerous meaningless buzzwords in them. Why is this so hard for you to understand?

Are you telling me that the JPP's ToS has meaningless buzzwords in them?

 

[gfm7175]

You claimed that FB and Twitter are targeting conservatives.

Correct.

I gave you Ted Cruz as an example. His accounts are still intact. Hannity and Carlson still have theirs. Do you want me to give you more examples to show that you're wrong?

This is where you erect a strawman and, instead of addressing my "FB and Twitter are targeting conservatives" claim, you address the strawman claim that you have erected, namely: "FB and Twitter have removed all conservatives from their platforms", and then you attack that particular easily refutable claim instead of addressing the claim that I actually made.

As I said, you have a logic problem here.

Most aren't even conservatives. They're far right.

Define "far right" and explain how that differs from conservatives.

So your claim that there are no liberals on the list is destroyed.

I've never made any such claim. I literally just got done agreeing with you that some liberals have been banned, numb nuts. Why must you be completely and utterly dishonest? Is this a requirement for being a liberal?

You have given me evidence that mostly far right and hate users being suspended or banned. I don't see very many true conservatives on the list.

Appeal to Purity Fallacy.

** Define "far right". Explain how it differs from conservative.
** Define "hate users".

Are you telling me that the JPP's ToS has meaningless buzzwords in them?

No. Seriously, can you not be so damn dishonest for once??

 

[AProudLefty]

Correct.


This is where you erect a strawman and, instead of addressing my "FB and Twitter are targeting conservatives" claim, you address the strawman claim that you have erected, namely: "FB and Twitter have removed all conservatives from their platforms", and then you attack that particular easily refutable claim instead of addressing the claim that I actually made.

How is it a strawman? Are Ted Cruz and other prominent conservatives/Republicans being targeted as well? Yes or no?

I have never claimed that FB and Twitter have removed all conservatives from their platforms. You're the one who made that strawman.

Define "far right" and explain how that differs from conservatives.

Anders Behring Breivik is an example of a far right user.

I've never made any such claim. I literally just got done agreeing with you that some liberals have been banned, numb nuts. Why must you be completely and utterly dishonest? Is this a requirement for being a liberal?

Yes you have made such claim.

Here it is.

Take a look at the plethora of conservatives on this list and the lack of liberals on this list...

Appeal to Purity Fallacy.

** Define "far right". Explain how it differs from conservative.
** Define "hate users".

RQAA. See above.

No. Seriously, can you not be so damn dishonest for once??

Dishonest about what? You claimed that they are targeting conservatives. I have debunked that claim over and over. And yet you just keep going. No clue why. Can't stand being wrong?

 

[gfm7175]

How is it a strawman? Are Ted Cruz and other prominent conservatives/Republicans being targeted as well? Yes or no?

I have never claimed that FB and Twitter have removed all conservatives from their platforms. You're the one who made that strawman.



Anders Behring Breivik is an example of a far right user.



Yes you have made such claim.

Here it is.





RQAA. See above.



Dishonest about what? You claimed that they are targeting conservatives. I have debunked that claim over and over. And yet you just keep going. No clue why. Can't stand being wrong?

This post contains excessive amounts of bizzlewizzle. It is thus summarily dismissed.

 

[AProudLefty]

This post contains excessive amounts of bizzlewizzle. It is thus summarily dismissed.

I will take that as a concession.

Good discussion though. Thank you.

 

[gfm7175]

I will take that as a concession.

Good discussion though. Thank you.

Claiming Victory Fallacy.
Bizzlewizzle.

Due to the presence of bizzlewizzle in your response, I will have to ignore all future responses of yours in this thread.