apple0154
MEOW
at least you're honest, not like ugly young boys and evince....by admitting you don't have the stats to back up an opinion
News break!! News break!! Post #98
at least you're honest, not like ugly young boys and evince....by admitting you don't have the stats to back up an opinion
you could say you're throwing out false assumptions and blind conjecture. she could have been teaching him firearms safety, not playing with firearms.Home schooled him. Taught him to shoot. AND told neighbors she was having problems with him and his mental illness. While knowing her son was mentally ill she encouraged him to play with fire arms.
What can I say?
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
We'll have to discuss some other solutions, because you have no right to take away anybody's guns.
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state
That's about THE most ignorant thought spoken in today's society.
You and your pea-shooter .. against the government.
The thoughts of children.
I've already done that. Forget it. Fools never take their blinders off.
And where ya been?
what did they mean by 'well regulated' when they wrote it? do you have documentation from the founders for that?Well, since the founders wrote "well regulated," you would think that the gunners wouldn't have problems with more regulations & restrictions.
you could say you're throwing out false assumptions and blind conjecture. she could have been teaching him firearms safety, not playing with firearms.
News break!! News break!! Post #98
Well, since the founders wrote "well regulated," you would think that the gunners wouldn't have problems with more regulations & restrictions.
Why would he need to know about fire arm safety?
What is a mentally disabled person doing with the fire arm in the first place? Well, I think that answer is because he had a mentally disabled mother believing the world was going to fall apart and he would need a gun to protect himself and his hoard of food. And the icing on the cake is the mother was determined to be capable of home schooling her son.
Why would he need to know about fire arm safety?
What is a mentally disabled person doing with the fire arm in the first place? Well, I think that answer is because he had a mentally disabled mother believing the world was going to fall apart and he would need a gun to protect himself and his hoard of food. And the icing on the cake is the mother was determined to be capable of home schooling her son.
You have no proof that she was teaching her son, anything about guns.
It's just as likely that she took him, so she could watch him.
what the hell do you think a gun range is for? and what kind of proof do you think they'd need to be shown?Since you're a gun freak and all that, don't most "responsible" gun ranges require proof of some kind of firearms training before they let someone in with a gun?
Since you're a gun freak and all that, don't most "responsible" gun ranges require proof of some kind of firearms training before they let someone in with a gun?
that is a worthless study. that is like saying people who drive or ride in cars are 50% more likely to get in an auto accident than someone who never drives or rides in a car.
you're welcome.
You have no proof that she was teaching her son, anything about guns.
It's just as likely that she took him, so she could watch him.
But you go ahead and be part of the mob that continues to drag the bodies of those 20 dead children, through the streets.
Of course you do, it fits your agenda. Never mind the fact that was in the process of having him committed to the state.
what the hell do you think a gun range is for? and what kind of proof do you think they'd need to be shown?
No, because that's where people usually go to "train"; but that doesn't mean they're training, just because they're there. They could just be watching.
It's a distinct possibility she did and, therefore, a worthwhile discussion. Whether she did or not there should be a law preventing such in the future.