Sure, there were weapons. They tried to prevent the certification of the vote, using flagpoles and fire extinguishers and trespassing.Nobody tried to violently try to overthrow the government. Why do you still perpetuate that lie?
Apparently it was the only violent overthrow where nobody had a gun except the cops that let people in.
Anyway, your side prefers silent coups like weaponizing the FBI with fake Russia Collusion stories.
You don't even believe this. So the plan was to charge the Capitol, get the capital police to stand down and use fire extinguishers to stop the vote?Sure, there were weapons. They tried to prevent the certification of the vote, using flagpoles and fire extinguishers and trespassing.
I never said it was going to be a successful plan, but the goal was only to delay the certification hearing so that it did not begin on the Constitutionally required date, to give trump and company a viable leg to stand on in Court.You don't even believe this. So the plan was to charge the Capitol, get the capital police to stand down and use fire extinguishers to stop the vote?
You do have a fertile imagination
I never said it was going to be a successful plan, but the goal was only to delay the certification hearing so that it did not begin on the Constitutionally required date, to give trump and company a viable leg to stand on in Court.
None that I know of, why?18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government
Who from Jan 6 has been charged with that?
So Jan 6 was an attempt to violently overthrow the governmentNone that I know of, why?
Because the DOJ exercised restraint and used other laws to extract fair and other legit process. Its called Judicial Discretion, using the most effective charges to get the punishment that is Just.So Jan 6 was an attempt to violently overthrow the government
Yet not a single person from that day has been charged with 18 U.S. Code § 2385
Why???
Even though you claimed for years that trump posed an existential threat to democracy. Clearly Democrats don't actually care about democracy. We all knew that before so no one is surprisedSee the difference between trumppers and democrats?
We don’t try to violently overthrow the government when we lose.
Trump is President. All that matters.They did not win at that goal.
He truly is an existential threat to Democracy. He cares not an inch about Democracy.Even though you claimed for years that trump posed an existential threat to democracy. Clearly Democrats don't actually care about democracy. We all knew that before so no one is surprised
You still trying to get democrats to get violent. Stop trying already we aren't magats.Even though you claimed for years that trump posed an existential threat to democracy. Clearly Democrats don't actually care about democracy. We all knew that before so no one is surprised
Its called NO EVIDENCE ...Advocating overthrow of GovernmentBecause the DOJ exercised restraint and used other laws to extract fair and other legit process. Its called Judicial Discretion, using the most effective charges to get the punishment that is Just.
So if he's limited by legal methods then he isn't an existential threat to democracy as you claimed. You either lied or you want to destroy America. Which is it?He truly is an existential threat to Democracy. He cares not an inch about Democracy.
That does not call for overturning Democracy, in an effort to save it. He will be limited by legal methods because while we believe in Democracy, we also know the only way to save it is via the Rule of Law, not operating outside the law.
^^This is why Garland is a complete failure.Its called NO EVIDENCE ...Advocating overthrow of Government
He clearly does not consider himself limited by legal methods.So if he's limited by legal methods then he isn't an existential threat to democracy as you claimed. You either lied or you want to destroy America. Which is it?
Then he is an existential threat to democracy but you will do nothing to stop him. So you didn't lie you just want to destroy America. Why didn't you just say that.He clearly does not consider himself limited by legal methods.
No I'm not. Keep up. I'm wondering why you aren't going to stop an existential threat to democracy from taking control of the govt. You people either lied or you want to destroy democracy. It's likely both.You still trying to get democrats to get violent. Stop trying already we aren't magats.