Where I stand... because this has apparently been confusing to people...

Phantasmal said:
16. Any issues with the Moderation of the board must be taken up in PM with the jpp.com staff.
Click to expand...

1. Are you Damocles' Mother?
2. I'm asking Damocles.
3. Who's this jive-ass, nit-wit that initiated this 'Forced Ignore' in the first place?
4. Did either this 'Jack' person, or this 'Owl' person contact you and mention/suggest/infer that there was a PROBLEM?
5. Did Moderator A just wake up one day, put on her jackboots, grab her riding crop, and decide she was going to muffle, stifle, prevent 'free speech and expression' between two participants on the JPP Forum?
6. (shaking head) How much 'dirt' do you have on Moderator B, Moderator C, and Moderator D? (Yes. I believe you do have a picture of a Goat in a, well, compromising position with Moderator C, but come on ... Moderator B and Moderator D?)

This person 'Owl' claims and insists that she is a 'strong and independent woman'. Moderator A denounces her claim and makes her look weak by this 'Forced Ignore'.
This person 'Owl' has exclaimed many times she can go 'toe-to-toe and eyeball-to-eyeball' with any man. Moderator A (unintentionally) mocks her statement with 'Forced Ignore'.

At this point, this 'Jack' person suggests ... "Octagon, Two Girls In, One Girl Out". I'm pretty sure this 'Owl' person (and I've known her for quite a while) wants to beat the holy shit out of you for the humiliation, embarrassment, and total destruction of her Honor and Reputation.
 
Jack said:
1. Are you Damocles' Mother?
2. I'm asking Damocles.
3. Who's this jive-ass, nit-wit that initiated this 'Forced Ignore' in the first place?
4. Did either this 'Jack' person, or this 'Owl' person contact you and mention/suggest/infer that there was a PROBLEM?
5. Did Moderator A just wake up one day, put on her jackboots, grab her riding crop, and decide she was going to muffle, stifle, prevent 'free speech and expression' between two participants on the JPP Forum?
6. (shaking head) How much 'dirt' do you have on Moderator B, Moderator C, and Moderator D? (Yes. I believe you do have a picture of a Goat in a, well, compromising position with Moderator C, but come on ... Moderator B and Moderator D?)

This person 'Owl' claims and insists that she is a 'strong and independent woman'. Moderator A denounces her claim and makes her look weak by this 'Forced Ignore'.
This person 'Owl' has exclaimed many times she can go 'toe-to-toe and eyeball-to-eyeball' with any man. Moderator A (unintentionally) mocks her statement with 'Forced Ignore'.

At this point, this 'Jack' person suggests ... "Octagon, Two Girls In, One Girl Out". I'm pretty sure this 'Owl' person (and I've known her for quite a while) wants to beat the holy shit out of you for the humiliation, embarrassment, and total destruction of her Honor and Reputation.
Click to expand...


You got slammed on forced ignore?
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!
WTF did you do?
 
Guille said:
You got slammed on forced ignore?
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!
WTF did you do?
Click to expand...

That's an interesting question. No one seems to know. No one can come up with an answer. Now ... I did have a Theory ...

Let's see, where shall we start? This woman here called 'Owl' is a pretty tough cookie, she likes to take on all comers, brags actually about beating down Right-wing wimps, you know, like USFREEDOM911, Truth Detector, Legina and the likes. And, she does have a nickname, 'The Nutcracker', which I have to admit, is well deserved. You have to know how to handle her, that is the secret, if you stand there with your hands in your pocket, starring at your shoes, ... she will literally kick you in the balls, knee you in the face, then physically grab you and throw you to the ground. Now, I don't want to brag, but ... Jack has given her a few spankings, well deserved spankings, spankings that she didn't like but had to accept. I don't want to go into all the lured details about how I made her take her pants down and bend over my knee and hand me the paddle and say "Spank me, Daddy" ... so I won't go into that here. Anyway, my point is: I figured that Owl had realized she was too weak, too ineffective, too lacking in stamina to take on any more opponents and receive any more public spankings. So ... she pays/hires 'Moderator A' (which I won't reveal her name just because of Ethics violations and stuff) to stifle/muffle/suppress any further debate with Jack. This is completely understandable and is really no surprise. THEN ... it is revealed Owl DID NOT request 'Protection'! That some sexist Moderator A just stepped in, decided that Owl had a vagina, and that automatically put Owl in 'Victim' class. (sigh) I can only guess how much that REALLY INFURIATED Owl because she doesn't identify with 'Victim'. At this stage ... I feel bad for Moderator A. Moderator A has denigrated, besmirched, and put a lasting blight on the Character, Integrity, and Reputation of Owl, something Owl takes Pride in and is Respected for. She's Earned that Respect.
 
Jack said:
That's an interesting question. No one seems to know. No one can come up with an answer. Now ... I did have a Theory ...

Let's see, where shall we start? This woman here called 'Owl' is a pretty tough cookie, she likes to take on all comers, brags actually about beating down Right-wing wimps, you know, like USFREEDOM911, Truth Detector, Legina and the likes. And, she does have a nickname, 'The Nutcracker', which I have to admit, is well deserved. You have to know how to handle her, that is the secret, if you stand there with your hands in your pocket, starring at your shoes, ... she will literally kick you in the balls, knee you in the face, then physically grab you and throw you to the ground. Now, I don't want to brag, but ... Jack has given her a few spankings, well deserved spankings, spankings that she didn't like but had to accept. I don't want to go into all the lured details about how I made her take her pants down and bend over my knee and hand me the paddle and say "Spank me, Daddy" ... so I won't go into that here. Anyway, my point is: I figured that Owl had realized she was too weak, too ineffective, too lacking in stamina to take on any more opponents and receive any more public spankings. So ... she pays/hires 'Moderator A' (which I won't reveal her name just because of Ethics violations and stuff) to stifle/muffle/suppress any further debate with Jack. This is completely understandable and is really no surprise. THEN ... it is revealed Owl DID NOT request 'Protection'! That some sexist Moderator A just stepped in, decided that Owl had a vagina, and that automatically put Owl in 'Victim' class. (sigh) I can only guess how much that REALLY INFURIATED Owl because she doesn't identify with 'Victim'. At this stage ... I feel bad for Moderator A. Moderator A has denigrated, besmirched, and put a lasting blight on the Character, Integrity, and Reputation of Owl, something Owl takes Pride in and is Respected for. She's Earned that Respect.
Click to expand...

In other words you don't want to cop to what you did. Fine.

I know you Amazon rejects think you're interesting and tough, I think you're all boring. If it were up to me I'd force iggy every single one of you just for being lame.
 
Guille said:
In other words you don't want to cop to what you did. Fine.

I know you Amazon rejects think you're interesting and tough, I think you're all boring. If it were up to me I'd force iggy every single one of you just for being lame.
Click to expand...

1. I'm completely in the dark on this. Moderator A refuses to state what her motivation was. My guess: Moderator A thought she was doing someone with a vagina a favor. (?)
2. "I'd force iggy every single one of you' ... have you considered teaming up with Moderator A?
 
Jack said:
1. I'm completely in the dark on this. Moderator A refuses to state what her motivation was. My guess: Moderator A thought she was doing someone with a vagina a favor. (?)
2. "I'd force iggy every single one of you' ... have you considered teaming up with Moderator A?
Click to expand...

1. Did you PM her and ask why?
2. This is highly unlikely to ever happen.

Seriously, just PM her and ask. Continuing to do this publicly isn't going to get you anywhere.
 
Guille said:
In other words you don't want to cop to what you did. Fine.

I know you Amazon rejects think you're interesting and tough, I think you're all boring. If it were up to me I'd force iggy every single one of you just for being lame.
Click to expand...

ghost-saying-boo-cliparts-co-ZUUEo1-clipart.jpg


:)
 
Guille said:
In other words you don't want to cop to what you did. Fine.

I know you Amazon rejects think you're interesting and tough, I think you're all boring. If it were up to me I'd force iggy every single one of you just for being lame.
Click to expand...

Most of the Amazonians get along just fine, in spite of our political and philosophical difference, with each other and with everyone else. The problem is and always has been That Owl Woman.
 
Controlled Opposition said:
Most of the Amazonians get along just fine, in spite of our political and philosophical difference, with each other and with everyone else. The problem is and always has been That Owl Woman.
Click to expand...

So true. Aimee's thread brought a "truce," where people from both sides had respectful conversation with each other, politics was left at the door. That pretty much ended when the "clown car" brought their feud into it, along with their many socks. Of course, we all know who the driver of the clown car is...
 
Guille said:
In other words you don't want to cop to what you did. Fine.

I know you Amazon rejects think you're interesting and tough, I think you're all boring. If it were up to me I'd force iggy every single one of you just for being lame.
Click to expand...

where is his evidence? Is he making a false accusation against a person?

And what's with the braggadocio?

His m.o. is accuse the person you are debating of which he, himself, is guilty of. the big liar syndrome.
 
RB 60 said:
So true. Aimee's thread brought a "truce," where people from both sides had respectful conversation with each other, politics was left at the door. That pretty much ended when the "clown car" brought their feud into it, along with their many socks. Of course, we all know who the driver of the clown car is...
Click to expand...

Look at the freakoid republicans bandwagoning Owl.
 
RB 60 said:
So true. Aimee's thread brought a "truce," where people from both sides had respectful conversation with each other, politics was left at the door. That pretty much ended when the "clown car" brought their feud into it, along with their many socks. Of course, we all know who the driver of the clown car is...
Click to expand...

I know you're the driver, liar.
 
Quoting OPie:
I am a Republican, albeit a libertarian (small l) constitutionalist Republican. I am an activist for constitutionalism, Bla Bal Bla!


That tells me everything I need to know about you! It tells me that you are a nut, and part of the problem!

Next!
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
Quoting OPie:
I am a Republican, albeit a libertarian (small l) constitutionalist Republican. I am an activist for constitutionalism, Bla Bal Bla!


That tells me everything I need to know about you! It tells me that you are a nut, and part of the problem!

Next!
Click to expand...

Boy, it's really pissing you off that Damocles isn't responding to you isn't it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top