USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
charges were dropped
flapping your gums is now punishable by jail ok tool
When was he in jail, enabler??
charges were dropped
flapping your gums is now punishable by jail ok tool
MOROM
it wasn't made illegal solely due to race as you claimed, the paper guys, namely hearst wanted it illegal....read your fucking history, i'm done talkign to a MOROM who won't bother to read the facts about the how and why it became illegal
NO FUCKING WAY JUSTIFIED
They did damage control and dropped them before he got a civil suit against the cops.
show me some newspapers that said ban pot so Hearst can make more money. I don't dissagree that's why, I dissagree that they used that to sell prohibition to the public. Asswhipe
dude, you're a fucking moron....i've repeatedly said they used race because they knew their reason wouldn't work...hence why they LATER used racism...the initial reason was NOT RACE, your cliam it is false
you're fucking stupid on this issue because race has clouded your thinking to the point of outright stupidity....you can't even read my posts properly
He didn't go to jail.charges were dropped
flapping your gums is now punishable by jail ok tool
He didn't go to jail.
BS, if he was even put in a holding cell is in doubt. He was arrested and an arraignment date was set and then he was released. It takes about 4 hours sure, but there is no time to put him in the county jail in 4 hours. Not even close. Plus there is nothing in your story about 4 hours or even a holding cell.yes he did for 4 hours
Which, again, is not jail. It takes about that amount of time to set an arraignment period, in fact that is very quick.the release today said 4hrs
so he was held against his will at the station for four hours.
The police made the right decision before they totally fucked themselves.
Which, again, is not jail. It takes about that amount of time to set an arraignment period, in fact that is very quick.
The main point?wow, I'm still getting used to the micro-fiber splitting of minutia around here while dodging the main point.
LOL. You're out of this thread because none of your points have actually bore any resemblance of logic or fact.when police take you in, most people would call that next step going to jail.
I'm out of this useless thread, you win you racist.
your a ged fucktard
you never said they used business first and later racism.
They used racism as the sole justification in the press, sure their real reason was money. We agree that it's racism that was the public justification for prohibition then we should be able to agree that it's racist not to change the law.
i've repeatedly said business was the reason...knowing that would never fly, they then used racism to convince people it was bad....you said it was made illegal because of racism, that is simply not true, racism was merely a tool, not the reason
and now, the reason is not racism at all but power....there is simply no reason for its continued illegality, especially in light of the repeal of prohibition...it is solely about power now, not race
OK, first I apologize for the stupid insults
We are now on the same page
reason=money
tool= sold to public as reason=racism
so your saying you agree it was sold to the public as racism and it's all about political power now. Which I mostly agree with.
But it's my hobby now to remind people that prohibition was sold under the vail of racism and as such it's racist to leave prohibition.
Especially since hundreds of thousand of minorities go to jail for possession.
NOt by the police. Maybe by the neighbors.Yes, I understand that type of situation could have occurred. However, you can also point to times when situations get out of hand when an individual doesn't comply with police officers requests or becomes belligerent for no reason.
At this point, it is a he said/he said situation with the cops telling one story and the professor another. I simply believe that based on this story, to call it racial profiling is a bit ridiculous. Could it be the cops went in all hard ass, sure, but did they do so based on race or because they thought there was a break in? I don't see anything that points to this being racial profiling.
It makes perfect sense if you have any knowledge of political history or of Boston. You lack the balls to even make an accusation. LOL.And the proof is? That made no sense, except to someone who is a .... guess. LOL