With the takeover of the NeoCons, it always amazed me at how ready and eager they were to bully the rest of the world ("Your either for us or against us, dammit!"); how ready they were to discard america's hard-won image and stature and the goodwill we earned with it; and how willing the NeoCons and Bush supporters were willing to insult and belittle the rest of the world ("Old Europe!").
It took seven post-war presidents, from Truman, to Eishenhower, to Reagan, to Clinton to build up a huge reservoir of good will. To build and maintain america's moral authority. And consequently, to be able to use that soft power, to promote american interests, and diplomacy.
To be sure, america always had enemies. America often didn't act morally. But, we still did enough things right, that we had earned a stature that no super-powers in the past ever had - not Rome, not Spain, not Persia, not the British empire - we were viewed as mostly decent, mostly fair-minded, and mostly an honest broker. Not that it was always true. But, that was our hard-won image. American people in particular, were widely admired and liked.
Bush-fans and Bush-voters threw a lot of that away, in four short years.
Josh Kurlantzick's Charm Offensive: How China's Soft Power Is Transforming the World. Kurlantzick argues that "China savvily has amassed significant “soft power” around the world through aid, formal diplomacy, public diplomacy, investment, and other tools" and is going to start to use it. We ignore this geopolitical shift, according to Kurlantzick, at our own peril.
It took seven post-war presidents, from Truman, to Eishenhower, to Reagan, to Clinton to build up a huge reservoir of good will. To build and maintain america's moral authority. And consequently, to be able to use that soft power, to promote american interests, and diplomacy.
To be sure, america always had enemies. America often didn't act morally. But, we still did enough things right, that we had earned a stature that no super-powers in the past ever had - not Rome, not Spain, not Persia, not the British empire - we were viewed as mostly decent, mostly fair-minded, and mostly an honest broker. Not that it was always true. But, that was our hard-won image. American people in particular, were widely admired and liked.
Bush-fans and Bush-voters threw a lot of that away, in four short years.
Josh Kurlantzick's Charm Offensive: How China's Soft Power Is Transforming the World. Kurlantzick argues that "China savvily has amassed significant “soft power” around the world through aid, formal diplomacy, public diplomacy, investment, and other tools" and is going to start to use it. We ignore this geopolitical shift, according to Kurlantzick, at our own peril.
China's Charm Offensive
By Josh Kurlantzick *
While the US has been focused on Iraq, it has ignored a subtle – but enormous – change in the world. Since only the early 2000s, and under the US radar, China has changed from a country that barely interacted with the world into a growing foreign power. In fact, China savvily has amassed significant “soft power” around the world through aid, formal diplomacy, public diplomacy, investment, and other tools. Here in Washington, where China’s image is not great, it’s hard for us to understand how popular China has become in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Even China’s model of development, of state-ordered economic liberalization and minimal political liberalization, has significant appeal. In particular, it has appeal to elites in nations in the region – and in other places like Africa – alienated by the Washington Consensus and American intervention around the world.
No one amassed chits with other nations for no reason. Now, China can begin to use its soft power. It will be able to utilize its popularity in regions where the US and China have potentially competing interests in resources. China is already trying to draw upon its charm to push back against American power in Asia. In the future, China could prod countries like the Philippines or Thailand, which are already using China as a hedge, to downgrade their close relations with the United States. Beijing continues to support authoritarian regimes, stemming from its vow of noninterference. This, too, weakens US diplomacy. Though their interests sometimes overlap, fundamentally the United States and China still do not agree on how diplomacy and international affairs should be conducted. And though Beijing can be persuaded to support better governance in places, like Burma, with limited resources and such horrendous regimes that they breed instability in China, it is much harder to persuade China to act against terrible governments with oil, like Sudan, or whose policies have no direct impact on China itself, like Zimbabwe. In the future, China’s ability to support its friends will only grow stronger as China builds its global soft power.
continued
http://bookclub.tpmcafe.com/blog/bookclub/2007/jun/25/chinas_charm_offensive