I had him on ignore once before and removed it. He’s about to go back on.
He can’t articulate shit, so he resorts to the same moronic memes ad nauseam.
White House officials agree with NYT op-ed
- Thread starter floridafan
- Start date
I had him on ignore once before and removed it. He’s about to go back on.
He can’t articulate shit, so he resorts to the same moronic memes ad nauseam.
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
He has nothing worthwhile to say because his juvenile thoughts aren't worthwhile.
Proving you do not know what treason is. This isn't it. I thought only Trump was dumb enough to call it that.
Priceless whining from two of the forums dumbest and most repugnant. 
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
^Sad little inarticulate illiterate. Words are too difficult for him, so he needs childish little pictures.
That’s what homeschooling does for you.
That and the stupid little fucker can't get it through his skull that I can't even see the dumb shit he posts...
Like you said.... home schooling.
So the letter to the times did not happen? You can read it. It is obvious that lots of others did. As always, the stupidity is yours.
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Contrary to what Trump says on his Twitter feed, media organizations are very wary of giving anyone and everyone anonymity to make attacks. Reporters push sources to put their names on quotes or at a minimum to narrow the anonymous descriptions to show as much of who these people are (and why they are saying what they are saying) as possible to the reader. Media organizations -- the credible ones at least -- are hugely averse to letting people take potshots without their names attached to it.
Given all of that, it's telling that the Times was willing to extend the cloak of anonymity to this author -- especially, again, because of the stakes and the target. This is not a decision made lightly. That the decision was made to publish it should tell you that this isn't some disgruntled mid-to-upper manager buried in the bureaucracy. This is a genuine high-ranking official. A name most people who follow politics -- and maybe some who don't -- would recognize. The Times simply wouldn't do what it did for anything short of a major figure in Trump world.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/06/politics/new-york-times-op-ed-donald-trump/index.html
Given all of that, it's telling that the Times was willing to extend the cloak of anonymity to this author -- especially, again, because of the stakes and the target. This is not a decision made lightly. That the decision was made to publish it should tell you that this isn't some disgruntled mid-to-upper manager buried in the bureaucracy. This is a genuine high-ranking official. A name most people who follow politics -- and maybe some who don't -- would recognize. The Times simply wouldn't do what it did for anything short of a major figure in Trump world.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/06/politics/new-york-times-op-ed-donald-trump/index.html
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
who cares what some janitor claimed in a letter to the editor.....it was probably Hilliary dictating to her old assistant in the state department........
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
the times would lie at the drop of a hat.......they already have.....since day 1......
https://nypost.com/2016/11/11/new-york-times-we-blew-it-on-trump/
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Wow low IQ goy boy
you don't know how it works do you?
Newspapers have solid sources, newspapers won't just print something from an asshat off the street claiming something, they protect , sources which are vetted and verified
JD my ass
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I do......lib'ruls lie......if lib'ruls control media, lib'rul media lies.......
lol
All they did was to admit bias. No lies. In fact:
“Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. admitted the paper failed to appreciate Donald Trump’s appeal.”
“Times reporters saw Trump “as an abnormal and potentially dangerous candidate””. Well, they sure as shit nailed that truth, didn’t they?
Sad little illiterate Trumpanzee
That is just so stupid. You are a person of memes. You waste so much time and effort making wasted posts like that. Wonder why you are an object of ridicule? Don't.
Its not treason to say the president is a complusive liar who has tantrums.. We all knew that already.
Its not treason to say he is always unprepared and rejects study or advice.
Nah.. they are just better educated.
I suppose some of us have encountered bosses like trump. They make going to work an ordeal. He does not respect the people he hires and abuses them at will. He hires second-raters who don't have the guts to defend themselves or their work against his childish fits of anger. Top flight staff would stand up to him and insist they be treated with respect. Can you imagine a highly qualified Atty. General putting up with Trumps immature and unfair attacks for a year and a half? He diminishes all who work for him. He gets the low level people who are insecure in their abilities.
Last edited:
Funny, the Repubs talk about the Federalist papers like they are a political bible. But John Jay, Hamilton and Madison wrote them and published them under a pseudonym Publius. That is anonymously you know.