Let's just have war with the despicable guy instead of inviting him to talk.
Trump could be inviting him to pull a Khashoggi on him......Hehehehehe.....
Let's just have war with the despicable guy instead of inviting him to talk.
Turkish offensive 'will not exceed 30km'
Turkey's Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said his country's operation would not go further than 30km (20 miles) deep into Syria.
"When we go 30km deep in the safe zone, terror there will be removed," he told CNN Turk, referring to the presence of Kurdish fighters considered by Ankara as "terrorists",
Cavusoglu also said Turkey had the right to use the air space over Syria as part of its campaign and that the "air space does not belong to the United States".
this is what you wroteDo you think the Kurds are going to continue to guard the prisons while their countrymen are fighting elsewhere? They will have to reallocate resources to confront the Turks, one of the reasons the Pentagon has criticized Trump's move
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...rds-latest-isis-sdf-middle-east-a9150816.html
https://www.stripes.com/news/middle-east/us-will-not-secure-isis-prisons-if-kurds-exit-1.602311
which is not true-why I asked for a cite.Consequently Kurdish soldiers start abondoning ISIS prisons to defend against Turkish advances, evolving the situation from betrayal to threatening
Trump could be inviting him to pull a Khashoggi on him......Hehehehehe.....
I’m no fan of Turkey but they ARE a NATO country.
Wait, doesn’t that make them our allies lol? The Kurds are our allies to whatever extent we were useful to them in occupying the territory they endeavored to make Kurdistan. We’re we supposed to help them?
Forget the Pentagon, wasn’t Congress supposed to check off on all that? Oh sorry, that all happened under the other ‘dictator’.
If the situation between the Kurds and Turks seems an intractable mess—it’s because it fricking is. Half of the Kurds are PKK and they are commie terrorists; and the Turks [our actual allies according to treaty] want them dead.
So—what are even doing in the middle of it in the first place? With all the handwringing from the so called ‘experts’ and their new-found neocon brethren on the left—not a one of them can give a coherent answer for ANY OF IT.
Just the same old boilerplate about ‘abandoning the Kurds’. If we are ever attacked should we hold breath waiting on the Kurds to be our ‘allies’?
I've gone over this ad nauseumAll that makes it all copacetic? Trump abondoning the US ally in its fight against ISIS is rationalized cause some official from Turkey says they will only advance twenty miles? And who do you think lives in that twenty miles? Currently Turkey is bombing Kurd installations to include Kurdish villages, and you are happy with some twenty mile promise?
Point being, Monday sold the Kurds down the drain, via twitter no less, Turkey starts bombing Kurds in anticipation of an invasion, and Tuesday Trump invites the individual responsible for that bombing of a loyal US ally to the White House as his "guest." And you don't see this as a problem?
So Trump didn't "abondon" the Kurds, via a tweet no less? And the Kurds haven't been our ally in fighting ISIS, actually, one of the few allies fighting ISIS on the ground? And one day after Trump shits on the Kurds he invites the guy currently bombing their villages to the White House, and you don't see a problem with this?
What an utterly idiotic thing to say. It's sad what you've become.
Don't know about the Amendment, but it is an embarrassment, you would think that Trump, after abondoning a loyal US ally, would have enough sense to wait till a much later date to invite the person now bombing that ally as his "guest" to the White House
this is what you wrote
which is not true-why I asked for a cite.
I know what the warhawks are saying -they say a lot of jingoistic shit to justify staying in Syria.
But if you want to war game it -OK fine.
1.this is a very narrow incursion,and only along a small area of the border.
Turkey has overwhelming firepower advantage,and reports show they are moving in quickly right behing softening the Kurds.
The Kurds guarding the prisoner are detailed as such, and there is no reason to say they will leave them
unattended or "jailbreaks" or the other hoopla I'm hearing.
2.If they are not in the fighting zone they would have to advance against the Turkish air/army, which really cant be done without being seen and targeted..so no they aren't going to leave the prisoners and advance into the fighting
So no -this is a false premise
Let's just have war with the despicable guy instead of inviting him to talk.

Oh, so now Trump does know more than the Pentagon and even his own intelligence entities on the situation, and you really think the Kurds are going to just give up cause Turkey is supposedly moving too fast for them to counter?
And now you are telling us that the Kurds, who watched Trump abandon them, and are experiencing Turkish bombardment while Trump invites the person responsible for that bombardment as his "guest" to the White House, are going to help out Trump and not come to the aid of their countrymen but rather continue to guard the ISIS prisoners sworn to fight the US?
Hardly a "false premise," rather a likely probability, there was a reason I included a military source as verification
And it is noticeable that you didn't respond to the simple question of Trump inviting to the White House one day after Trump abandons via tweet the Kurds the very person now bombing the Kurds
Who’s been telling you it was a problem?
Erdogan is an ally *according to treaty*. If you want to argue Turkey has no business being in NATO I’m all ears.
How many home runs have the Pentagon and the ‘intelligence agencies’ [something of an oxymoron lately] hit in the Middle East in the last 20 years lol?
How's that bromance and nuclear disarmament with Kim going? Or shouldn't we talk about that?
Hope you got BOB fresh batteries for tonight's rally.![]()
Oh, so inviting to the White House as your "guest" the very person who one day after you kiss off an ally is bombing that ally is copacetic? That is a great message to send to the world community, and surely they noticed
Good luck finding another ally for intelligence or actual ground fighting if situations in the Middle East demand such, better yet, finding an ally with Trump promises
it wouldn't be the first time the Pentagon endorsed Iraq and Libya.Oh, so now Trump does know more than the Pentagon and even his own intelligence entities on the situation, and you really think the Kurds are going to just give up cause Turkey is supposedly moving too fast for them to counter?
I explained to you the logistics would make it impossible or very difficult/ these are what you don't get while watching expert on TV.And now you are telling us that the Kurds, who watched Trump abandon them, and are experiencing Turkish bombardment while Trump invites the person responsible for that bombardment as his "guest" to the White House, are going to help out Trump and not come to the aid of their countrymen but rather continue to guard the ISIS prisoners sworn to fight the US?
"military sources" would have us in perpetual deployment.Hardly a "false premise," rather a likely probability, there was a reason I included a military source as verification
I'm fine with it. They need to meet up we have lots of mutual concerns, and conflicts to work thruAnd it is noticeable that you didn't respond to the simple question of Trump inviting to the White House one day after Trump abandons via tweet the Kurds the very person now bombing the Kurds
And Trump abandons allies on the bull shit premise of removing troops for their sake but sends troops to the Saudis who butchered a journalist alive and produced the 9/11 hijackers.
What ever it is it is higher than Trump's
we will when we need it if it meets the needs of a potential partner.Oh, so inviting to the White House as your "guest" the very person who one day after you kiss off an ally is bombing that ally is copacetic? That is a great message to send to the world community, and surely they noticed
Good luck finding another ally for intelligence or actual ground fighting if situations in the Middle East demand such, better yet, finding an ally with Trump promises