White Man Exercising Free Speech Rights is Assaulted by Black Man

[CFM]

what i support is freedom. that you believe freedom is anarchy tells us that you prefer tyranny.

You support doing whatever you want to do and not being told no when you need to be told no. That's anarchy.

 

[Nordberg]

It would be interesting to get this in court. It was assault, but the assaultee caused it. It would not have happened if he just shut up and didn't cause trouble. He is the cause., Free speech has limitations.

 

[CFM]

It would be interesting to get this in court. It was assault, but the assaultee caused it. It would not have happened if he just shut up and didn't cause trouble. He is the cause., Free speech has limitations.

That's like saying a spoon/fork is the cause of obesity.

Are you justifying assault when the one doing it doesn't like what the one he/she assaults has to say?

 

[hvilleherb]

The big picture is a fundamental misunderstanding of constitutional rights.

Obviously the black man didn't realize the white man had free speech rights.

 

[Nordberg]

Obviously the black man didn't realize the white man had free speech rights.

Still stupid after all these years. The Supremes carved out an exception for "fighting words" .They were defined as face to face insults directed at a person intended to provoke a response. So again, your ignorance is showing. Keep posting Vile, someday you might get something right.

 

[christiefan915]

The punch knocked the white man back and left him dangling over the edge of the platform above the train tracks.

It appears he gets hit again twice by the same man. With the punches, the white man was knocked into the pit, next to the tracks as the crowd erupts into screams.

https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/commuter-punches-man-used-n-word-blue-line-spat/

No one's surprised about your tacit acceptance of the thug using the "n" word, herbie.