Does anyone on here agree with Cheney that President Obama has made America less safe?
Does anyone here agree with Cheney that tourture was necessary to save American lives?
Does anyone here agree with Cheney that tourture did in fact save American lives?
1. Yes.
2&3. I think you mean "torture", yet the enhanced interrogation techniques approved by Cheney and Pelosi do not meet the definition of torture. The approved techniques were necessary, and did in fact save American lives.
Yes to the first question andDoes anyone on here agree with Cheney that President Obama has made America less safe?
Does anyone here agree with Cheney that tourture was necessary to save American lives?
Does anyone here agree with Cheney that tourture did in fact save American lives?

[/QUOTE]You know I would agree with you.
quote=Southern Man;440539]1. Yes.
2&3. I think you mean "torture", yet the enhanced interrogation techniques approved by Cheney and Pelosi do not meet the definition of torture. The approved techniques were necessary, and did in fact save American lives.
There's a definition in the dictionary and the UN has one- we violated neither.Whats your def of torture?
Now you are claiming Pelosi approved these techniques?
 
	 
	 
	Cheney got deferments from military service while Clinton openly was a draft dodger......one guy is ridiculed and the other is a left wing hero....
Thats quite ironic.....and quite hypocritical of those that excuse Clinton for evading the draft and not serving when called.....
And just FYI....a little trivia...
Democratic vice presidential nominee Joe Biden received five student draft deferments during the Vietnam War, the same number of deferments received by Vice President Dick Cheney, and later was disqualified from service because of asthma as a teenager.
According to the documents, Biden, 65, received several deferments while he was an undergraduate at the University of Delaware and later as a law student at Syracuse University.
 
	Cheney allowed 3000 to die on his watch. What's the count for Obama.
The difference between Cheney and Clinton is, Cheney is a chickenhawk!
Chickenhawk (also chicken hawk and chicken-hawk) is a political epithet used in the United States to criticize a politician, bureaucrat, or commentator who strongly supports a war or other military action, yet who actively avoided military service when of draft age.
The term is meant to indicate that the person in question is cowardly or hypocritical for personally avoiding combat in the past while advocating that others go to war in the present. Generally, the implication is that "chickenhawks" lack the experience, judgment, or moral standing to make decisions about going to war.
The term was first applied to vocal supporters of military action who were perceived to have used family connections or college deferments to avoid serving in previous wars, particularly the Vietnam War. In current usage, the label is used almost exclusively to describe ardent supporters of the Iraq War who have themselves never been in combat; it is seldom if ever used with respect to supporters of the (more broadly supported) war in Afghanistan as such. The label is not usually applied to women (who were historically, in most countries, barred by law from serving in combat). People who use the term have not necessarily been in the military themselves; people labeled "chickenhawks" have sometimes served in the military, but have not seen combat. Although it is possible to have a military career and never be at war, the term is often used in the context of someone who has been in the military in time of war but make efforts to steer clear of combat, such as George W. Bush's military records showing he wrote "do not volunteer" on being requested if he would consider a tour of duty in Vietnam.
http://www.symbolman.com/chickenhawks.html

