Who else thinks these people are dangerous?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JustParanoid
  • Start date Start date
He actually sounds pretty cool

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_LaRouche#1948.E2.80.931967_LaRouche_and_Trotskyism
The most common criticism of LaRouche in the mainstream press is that he is a conspiracy theorist. Also, due in large part to LaRouche's campaigns against Zionism in the 1970s and Neoconservatism beginning in the 1990s, LaRouche has been accused of Anti-Semitism.

Since the 1970s, LaRouche and his organization have been criticised from across the political spectrum, including by the Washington Post, the New Republic, the Heritage Foundation, the Anti-Defamation League, and the League for Industrial Democracy. In 1979, a two-part article appeared in the New York Times that was strongly critical of LaRouche.[43]
Click to expand...

Internationalist Zion-o-fascists hate the truth.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Things unsupported by evidence are not necessarily false.
Click to expand...
Nor are they necessarily true, especially when all the evidence points elsewhere, at that point they are half-baked and silly.

It's like actually believing that Bill and Ted could start a religion. The precepts weren't bad.

I mean, "Be excellent to each other." and "Party on, Dude!"...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top