We all contribute to the Public schools.
That's a good example.
Interstate Freeways, have a problem with that?
Oppose construction of Hoover Dam by the Government?
How about the Panama Canal?
NASA?
Poor JackOFF; doesn't know the difference between goods and services and infrastructure projects. This is why you cannot argue with an idiot. They have no knowledge base to start from.
It's time to play the "who said that" game. Who's political platform is this:
Wants to deepen the fight against poverty, expand agricultural production, and guarantee the “survival of the human species” on the planet, turn the nation into a global “economic power,” make the nation into “the largest classroom in the world.”
Other policies included redistribution of wealth, land reform, and democratization of economic activity via workplace self-management and creation of worker-owned cooperatives.
Panama Canal was an 'infrastructure' project?
NASA going to the Moon was an 'infrastructure' project?
This is the Hitler Ate Sugar fallacy.
Thread trolling bullshit; do you ever add anything to the debate?
Might be something Castro said. Then, using Fox News Propaganda, begin the smear campaign of Sanders with: 'Communist' and 'Dictator'.
Totally missing the point of "Wants to deepen the fight against poverty" ... "expand agricultural production" ... "guarantee the “survival of the human species” on the planet".
This is the usual tactic used, and in which, the Bluntskulls eat this shit up.
Nobody supports 'Communism' and nobody supports 'Dictators'. But knowing TD and how he LOVES making up his false narratives, this is what it will turn into.
Watch! Watch how TD rails against 'Communism' and 'Dictators'.
I'm not trolling. The "who said this?" game is Hitler Ate Sugar. It's saying, oh, you agree with this thing and a candidate you support probably said it? GOTCHA! It was actually Stalin!
So what? So what if we agree with something a bad person said? If, as the example goes, Hitler ate sugar, does that make sugar bad?
Your explaining things to a brick wall would be time better spent.
The truth is that it's not Bernie sucking up to and praising murderous thieving authoritarians and dictators. It's douche bag Trump!
This is the Hitler Ate Sugar fallacy.
You're not addressing my point because you can't.
Notice that I didn't say anything rude to you before you gave up and resorted to trolling.![]()
I'm not trolling. The "who said this?" game is Hitler Ate Sugar. It's saying, oh, you agree with this thing and a candidate you support probably said it? GOTCHA! It was actually Stalin!
So what? So what if we agree with something a bad person said? If, as the example goes, Hitler ate sugar, does that make sugar bad?
You're not addressing my point because you can't.
Were you talking about the above post? What is the point other than pointless troll laden blather? You don't want to be taken seriously. I am not about to pretend your bullshit is anything but.
Run along now.
You think they are goods and services?![]()
![]()
I'm not trolling. The "who said this?" game is Hitler Ate Sugar. It's saying, oh, you agree with this thing and a candidate you support probably said it? GOTCHA! It was actually Stalin!
So what? So what if we agree with something a bad person said? If, as the example goes, Hitler ate sugar, does that make sugar bad?
You are appealing to common sense and logic. Are you kidding? hahahahahahahahaha
Even if there is a modicum of common sense within Trump supporters, they are not honest enough or have enough integrity to admit the truth of it.
So not much difference between you and communism?
What if people don’t want to pay for someone else’s healthcare can they opt out or would you force them?
Your explaining things to a brick wall would be time better spent. The truth is that it's not Bernie sucking up to and praising murderous thieving authoritarians and dictators. It's douche bag Trump!