Why current conservatism is NOT good for you.

Ironic, now they want to "preserve the Constitution," yet back anything Trump says or does that shits on the Constitution, and what the hell is "Old America?"
shits on the constitution?......you mean like the politicization of search warrant?.........like changing election methods without state legislative approval?.....like impeachment as a political tool?.....like calling for stacking the Supreme Court or abolishing the electoral college?.....
 
I dont work for you.

So you can not, you can not define the terms you employ, it is easy to blame "those people," "those people did it," "you know, those people," if you want to say something the reader anticipates you understand, you specify who "those people" are
 
So you can not, you can not define the terms you employ, it is easy to blame "those people," "those people did it," "you know, those people," if you want to say something the reader anticipates you understand, you specify who "those people" are

I investigate and speak truth to the best of my ability.

You do whatever it is that you do.
 
shits on the constitution?......you mean like the politicization of search warrant?.........like changing election methods without state legislative approval?.....like impeachment as a political tool?.....like calling for stacking the Supreme Court or abolishing the electoral college?.....

No warrant was politicalized, and please, spare us the talk radio rhetoric. If you are referring to Pennsylvania, even the SCOTUS confirmed none of that happened, impeachment wasn't political, and I can't think of anyone who ever stacked the SCOTUS or abolished the electoral college, again, talk radio rhetoric

On the other hand though, actual examples, several from Conservative sources, and none of them even include attempting to stop Congress from executing its Constitutional responsibilities on January 6th

https://www.politico.com/magazine/s...unconstitutional-freedom-liberty-khan-214139/
https://www.theusconstitution.org/blog/president-trump-mocking-the-constitution/
https://www.cato.org/commentary/exit-survey-trumps-constitutional-misdeeds
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/02/five-trump-amendments-constitution/618097/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...failures-require-reckoning-column/5817963002/
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/po...onstitution/lROExwrjgyRDT6Qu9dm6jN/story.html
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-violated-constitution-separation-powers-three-times-1427253
 
I investigate and speak truth to the best of my ability.

You do whatever it is that you do.

Sure, as long as you don't have to explain the terms and generations you employ, same reason talk radio was successful, anyone could say what they wanted without having to define terms or answer questions
 
Sure, as long as you don't have to explain the terms and generations you employ, same reason talk radio was successful, anyone could say what they wanted without having to define terms or answer questions

no.
talk radio was successful because it was a whole side of things that went unaddressed in the rest of the media.
 
I am Hawkeye and I am here to help. My pointing towards reality as I understand it is my gift to you. Do with it as you wish understanding that your education was always your problem....I got mine.
 
No warrant was politicalized, and please, spare us the talk radio rhetoric. If you are referring to Pennsylvania, even the SCOTUS confirmed none of that happened, impeachment wasn't political, and I can't think of anyone who ever stacked the SCOTUS or abolished the electoral college, again, talk radio rhetoric

On the other hand though, actual examples, several from Conservative sources, and none of them even include attempting to stop Congress from executing its Constitutional responsibilities on January 6th

https://www.politico.com/magazine/s...unconstitutional-freedom-liberty-khan-214139/
https://www.theusconstitution.org/blog/president-trump-mocking-the-constitution/
https://www.cato.org/commentary/exit-survey-trumps-constitutional-misdeeds
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/02/five-trump-amendments-constitution/618097/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...failures-require-reckoning-column/5817963002/
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/po...onstitution/lROExwrjgyRDT6Qu9dm6jN/story.html
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-violated-constitution-separation-powers-three-times-1427253

LOL.

all you do is lie.

expect cheney-like results going forward.
 
the royals play both sides against each other.

the marxists oversold their ability to influence the populations.

virginia, the primaries.

the working people factions are chosen by the royals as to who can accoplish their goals best.

the marxist contingent way oversold, they will lose, for now.

but the battle against evil is ongoing.

be forever vigilant.

:magagrin:
 
If you are referring to Pennsylvania, even the SCOTUS confirmed none of that happened

I've not seen that the SCOTUS has looked at the PA case since the decision in January, 2022.....feel free to link it.....

as to the rest, AssHat has already adequately responded to your tripe.....
 
globalists believe trade policy should be sculpted to benefit international corporations and not the american citizenry in general.

globalists misreresent the perceived benefits of globalized trglobade, accentuating alleged positives and denying obvious negatives.

globalist are open border and don't care that immigration suppresses wages for citizens.

Oh wow, who knew?! Do these globalists have like a bible or something, a manual where you can find out more? Do they have churches and meetings and stuff? Does it cost to join?

:laugh:
 
we can have a few assholes at the top, amongst the rank and file though, it cannot be.

this is why the hierarchy cannot be externalized.

80/20.

desh actually agreed with me on this.
 
Back
Top