Why didn't Trayvon just go home?

I Love America said:
True, Zimmerman could be lying. But, so far everything I have seen corroborates his story. The lone star witness for the prosecution cant keep her story straight. Hell, she even lied about writing a letter to Trayvon's mother.


Based on the evidence, there should have never been charges, but the race baiters coerced the DA into trumping up a bogus 2nd Degree Murder charge.

Will Zimmerman go free? I can't predict. Will the jurors do the right thing or will they be pressured into sacrificing this one man out of fear of getting the blacks all fired up? It is like bowing down to terrorist muslimes. Can't talk bad about the prophet cuz the muslimes will get pissed. Well, this is the same thing.
Click to expand...

Really? IIRC, Zimmerman said that there was a struggle for his gun, that Martin grabbed it. But when the testing on the gun was complete, there was neither fingerprints or DNA of Martin's on the weapon.

As far as the charge itself? I agree. 2nd degree murder isn't appropriate, but I disagree that there should be none. Negligent Manslaughter is a much more realistic charge.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
It's amazing how the racist continue to make a big deal defending some wanna be cop who can only get a hard on with a gun and an authority complex. What I'm also finding interesting is they have proven so far in this case, as a fact, that Zimmerman did create an uneccessary confrontation with a teenaged kid who wasn't doing anything wrong but so far the defense has not established, as a fact, that young Mr. Martin attacked him. Hmmmmm wonder if that's enough to convict him? LOL
Click to expand...

Care to provide proof that he could only get a hard on with a gun, or are you just being subjective again and waiting for the trial's outcome?
And could you please explain how he created this confrontation; because unless you can prove he confronted Martin, then it appears that it's Martin who CREATED the confrontation?

You're as a big of a hypocrite as the rest of the left.
 
Steelplate said:
Hey numbnuts.....HE.COMMITTED no crime and if Zimmerman would have acted responsibly there would be no death.
Click to expand...
and according to the prosecution witness, you would be wrong. It looks like martin did indeed commit a crime. If those facts bear out, martin is responsible for his own death. how do you like those numbnuts?
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Wow.....demonize some kid who was doing nothing wrong.....real nice of you. Would you do that if he was white? LOL
Click to expand...

I guess you missed the part where I said that I believe the entire "brother home alone" situation is bs and was just a made up lie.

Nice to see that you're still willing to wait until all the evidence has been presented and the decision of the jury.

By the way; where's all the wearing of sack cloth and wailing from the left, about all the black kids killed by black adults?
 
Steelplate said:
That sums it up pretty well as to how I feel about the whole thing. Zimmerman is not a monster. But he is responsible for the boy's death. It wasn't premeditated, it wasn't malicious....but he is responsible. He made errors in judgment that took another human being's life. For that, he must be held accountable.

Imagine that....you and I agreeing on something.
Click to expand...

How is he "accountable" when the evidence has showen that his head was being slammed into the sidewalk?
How many times would you allow someone to slam your head into the sidewalk, before you felt that you might die?
Once?
Twice?
Three times?
Four times?
How many?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
How is he "accountable" when the evidence has showen that his head was being slammed into the sidewalk?
How many times would you allow someone to slam your head into the sidewalk, before you felt that you might die?
Once?
Twice?
Three times?
Four times?
How many?
Click to expand...

Because Zimmerman provoked the the confrontation. The Kid was scared...the adult was assuming a role of authoritarian.

How long would you let an unknown person follow you before confronting him?
 
Steelplate said:
Because Zimmerman provoked the the confrontation. The Kid was scared...the adult was assuming a role of authoritarian.

How long would you let an unknown person follow you before confronting him?
Click to expand...

You didn't answer the question.
All you did was try to move the goalposts and failed at that.
Any lawyer will tell you that if Person B runs away to the point that Person A no longer knows where Person B is, the immediate threat to Person B has been removed; but if Person B then returns and confronts Person A, Person B is now the aggressor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top