Why do liberals always protect perverts

Republican Sexual Predators, Abusers, and Enablers Pt. 1 of 23 pages

Former Republican Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert convicted of sex abuse

Former Cobb County COP Chairman Joseph Russell Dendy - child molesting

So-called "pro-life"/ antigay activist Howard Scott Heldreth was convicted of raping a child

GOP Richland County Commissioner David F. Swartz convicted of sexually abusing a girl from age 6 upwards - released after only 8 years!!!!
Republican judge Mark Pazuhanich pleaded no contest to molesting his 10-year-old daughter.

Republican anti-abortion activist Nicholas Morency pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography on his computer and offering a bounty to anybody who murders an abortion doctor.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...an-Sexual-Predators-Abusers-and-Enablers-Pt-1
 
Well when the thread starts with a generalization fallacy what do you expect?

There is no fallacy in starting from a generalization. Others can more narrowly refine the discussion as it goes. It is a fallacy to inject a complete irrelevance in order to deflect from the subject of that discussion because you don't like where it's headed.
 
Its a rightwing kook site Townhall.com features commentary by various conservative columnists and guest commentary by politicians. Guest contributors have included Eric Trump, Donald Trump Jr., and Lara Trump. :palm:

fallacy-genetic-fallacy-800x371.png
 
Bob, who else but, an extreme right wing disinformation site would publish something this absurd????? The reason that they publish this type of ridiculous garbage , is because there are no shortage of intellectual invalids like yourself that believe this type of off the wall tripe.

fallacy-genetic-fallacy-800x371.png
 
The left thinks up-skirting women and girls is OK, apparently

Peter Vallone Jr. had been receiving complaints in his Queens district office for a number of weeks about a pervert who had been ordering a bagel and coffee every morning and then parking himself directly under the train platform vent for the N-line subway.

This particular perv had a thing for looking up women's skirts and he found it amusing to calmly eat his breakfast while stretching his neck to peep.

Vallone's own staffers even complained as the place the man like to do his viewing from was literally steps from the councilman's front door.

Vallone began to research the matter and discovered that the man was breaking no known law in New York.

Incredulous at this dismaying fact, the councilman drafted a resolution that would punish such behavior. As the failing New York Times put it: "The bill would make it illegal to look at a person’s “sexual or other intimate parts, in other than a casual or cursory manner, for the purpose of entertainment, sexual arousal or gratification, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing the person being viewed."

Pretty straightforward right?

Not according to liberals.

The New York Civil Liberties Union (directly associated with the ACLU) issued a statement calling the proposed legislation "creepy lawmaking."



https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2007/08/26/why-liberals-always-protect-perverts-n1142242
 
Its a rightwing kook site

Townhall.com features commentary by various conservative columnists and guest commentary by politicians. Guest contributors have included Eric Trump, Donald Trump Jr., and Lara Trump. :palm:

With kooky stories. ,
 
There is no fallacy in starting from a generalization. Others can more narrowly refine the discussion as it goes. It is a fallacy to inject a complete irrelevance in order to deflect from the subject of that discussion because you don't like where it's headed.

Somebody who lives in a glass house threw a rock at someone, and then what do you think happened next???????????????
 
Peter Vallone Jr. had been receiving complaints in his Queens district office for a number of weeks about a pervert who had been ordering a bagel and coffee every morning and then parking himself directly under the train platform vent for the N-line subway.

This particular perv had a thing for looking up women's skirts and he found it amusing to calmly eat his breakfast while stretching his neck to peep.

Vallone's own staffers even complained as the place the man like to do his viewing from was literally steps from the councilman's front door.

Vallone began to research the matter and discovered that the man was breaking no known law in New York.

Incredulous at this dismaying fact, the councilman drafted a resolution that would punish such behavior. As the failing New York Times put it: "The bill would make it illegal to look at a person’s “sexual or other intimate parts, in other than a casual or cursory manner, for the purpose of entertainment, sexual arousal or gratification, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing the person being viewed."

Pretty straightforward right?

Not according to liberals.

The New York Civil Liberties Union (directly associated with the ACLU) issued a statement calling the proposed legislation "creepy lawmaking."



https://townhall.com/columnists/kevinmccullough/2007/08/26/why-liberals-always-protect-perverts-n1142242

Leprosy, Townhall is a disinformation site, so you just can't believe what they publish.
 
Back
Top