I see you cannot justify your "hate" accusations against me.
I see you cannot commentate on what else you find "offensive."
What, in that article, do you find disputable?
You hate freedom of speech and freedom of religion. You've made that more than obvious. The article is just the usual legalistic double talk. And you're the one who finds anything that you don't 100% agree with "offensive".
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk